Buch, Englisch, 252 Seiten, Format (B × H): 152 mm x 229 mm, Gewicht: 453 g
A Debate
Buch, Englisch, 252 Seiten, Format (B × H): 152 mm x 229 mm, Gewicht: 453 g
Reihe: Little Debates about Big Questions
ISBN: 978-1-032-00086-2
Verlag: Taylor & Francis Ltd
Can religious citizens live cooperatively and justly with others in a pluralistic polity? Can religious arguments play a role within healthy democratic deliberation?
In this volume, Paul Billingham and Marilie Coetsee debate these timely issues, examining what responsible democratic citizenship requires of the religiously committed. Billingham argues that a religious citizen doesn’t need to check or undermine her deepest beliefs in order to engage in the political life of a pluralistic society, and rebuts familiar worries about religious political arguments being dogmatic, domineering, and incomprehensible and unpersuasive to non-believers. Furthermore, he draws on real-life examples to argue that religious contributions to democratic deliberation can be beneficial, ultimately strengthening discourse, pluralism, and democracy. Coetsee is much more skeptical. She argues that a pluralistic democracy requires a “strong integrationist” commitment from all citizens, a commitment that poses strong challenges to the religiously devout and to the cohesion of religious communities. Such integrationist commitments, according to Coetsee, include being active in non-religious civic associations and advancing non-religious reasons for laws that those outside their faith will accept.
The two authors then take turns responding to each other.
Zielgruppe
General, Undergraduate Advanced, and Undergraduate Core
Autoren/Hrsg.
Weitere Infos & Material
1. Defending the Place of Religion in Democratic Discourse 2. Religious, Polarization, and Democratic Politics: Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom, But Be Prepared to Prune 3. Polarization, Convergence, and Religious Politics: Against Coetsee’s Strong Deliberative Stance 4. Let’s Get Real: Religious Advocacy in Theory and Practice 5. Reaffirming Religion’s Place in Democratic Discourse 6. Defending Strong Deliberation: Public Goods Require Personal Virtue




