Rethinking the Ontological Argument

Erscheinungsjahr 2015
ISBN: 978-0-521-86369-8
Verlag: Cambridge University Press

Buch, Englisch, 180 Seiten, Format (B × H): 157 mm x 235 mm, Gewicht: 423 g

In recent years, the ontological argument and theistic metaphysics have been criticized by philosophers working in both the analytic and continental traditions. Responses to these criticisms have primarily come from philosophers who make use of the traditional, and problematic, concept of God. In this volume, Daniel A. Dombrowski defends the ontological argument against its contemporary critics, but he does so by using a neoclassical or process concept of God, thereby strengthening the case for a contemporary theistic metaphysics. Relying on the thought of Charles Hartshorne, he builds on Hartshorne's crucial distinction between divine existence and divine actuality, which enables neoclassical defenders of the ontological argument to avoid the familiar criticism that the argument moves illegitimately from an abstract concept to concrete reality. His argument, thus, avoids the problems inherent in the traditional concept of God as static.

Autoren/Hrsg.

Dombrowski, Daniel A.

Fachgebiete

• Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Metaphysik, Ontologie
• Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Religionsphilosophie, Philosophische Theologie
• Geisteswissenschaften Religionswissenschaft Religionswissenschaft Allgemein Religionsphilosophie, Philosophische Theologie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Introduction; 1. Historical background; 2. Poetry v. the ontological argument: Richard Rorty's challenge; 3. Deconstructionism and the ontological argument: the case of Mark Taylor; 4. Is the ontological argument worthless?: Graham Oppy's rejection; 5. Oppy, perfect islands, and existence as a predicate; 6. Rival concepts of God and the ontological argument: Thomas Morris, Katherin Rogers and Alvin Plantinga.

Über Autor(innen)

Dombrowski, Daniel A.
Daniel A. Dombrowski is Professor of Philosophy at Seattle University. He is the author of fourteen books and over one hundred scholarly articles, and has written broadly in the area of process or neoclassical theism.