Buch, Englisch, 416 Seiten, Format (B × H): 153 mm x 216 mm, Gewicht: 624 g
ISBN: 978-3-031-87820-6
Verlag: Springer
Is getting high immoral? In this book, Rob Lovering defends the claim that it is not. More specifically, he argues that recreational drug use (of which getting high is a token) is neither intrinsically, nor generally extrinsically, immoral. In other words, he contends that recreational drug use is neither immoral in and of itself nor generally immoral due to an immoral-making factor with which it may be contingently linked [e.g., harm]. Lovering does so by offering two arguments for recreational drug use’s ultima facie (all things considered) moral permissibility and critiquing twenty-four arguments for its immorality.
Meant to be a companion to Lovering's A Moral Defense of Recreational Drug Use (Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), which was written for a general audience, this book is written for an academic—specifically, philosophical—audience and explores recreational drug use in a deeper, more philosophically and empirically rigorous way.
Zielgruppe
Research
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
- Sozialwissenschaften Soziologie | Soziale Arbeit Soziologie Allgemein
- Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Ethik, Moralphilosophie
- Rechtswissenschaften Strafrecht Kriminologie, Strafverfolgung
- Sozialwissenschaften Psychologie Allgemeine Psychologie Sozialpsychologie
- Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Sozialphilosophie, Politische Philosophie
Weitere Infos & Material
1. Preliminaries.- 2. Arguments for Recreational Drug Use.- 3. Self-Regarding Consequentialist Arguments Against Recreational Drug Use.- 4. Other-Regarding Consequentialist Arguments Against Recreational Drug Use.- 5. Pleasure-Regarding Nonconsequentialist Arguments Against Recreational Drug Use.- 6. Degradation-Regarding Nonconsequentialist Arguments Against Recreational Drug Use.- 7. Religious Arguments Against Recreational Drug Use.




