Buch, Englisch, 190 Seiten, Format (B × H): 234 mm x 155 mm, Gewicht: 302 g
A Theory
Buch, Englisch, 190 Seiten, Format (B × H): 234 mm x 155 mm, Gewicht: 302 g
Reihe: Ethics, Human Rights and Global Political Thought
ISBN: 978-0-367-44252-1
Verlag: Taylor & Francis Ltd
The volume delves into different theoretical understandings of the idea of toleration and what it has come to mean in today’s highly polarised world. It argues that classifying states as liberal and nonliberal is important but cannot explain how they should relate to one another. Putting forward a new reconstruction of Rawls’s theory of political liberalism, Maffettone makes a compelling case for the claim that the separation between domestic and international political domains can enable a liberal state to have equal respect and recognition for at least some nonliberal ones.
A major intervention in political and legal philosophy, this book will be indispensable to students and teachers of political theory, international relations, peace and conflict studies, international law, and human rights. It will also be of interest to government think tanks and civil servants.
Zielgruppe
General and Postgraduate
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
- Geisteswissenschaften Religionswissenschaft Religionswissenschaft Allgemein Religiöse Intoleranz, Verfolgung, Religionskonflikte
- Interdisziplinäres Wissenschaften Wissenschaften Interdisziplinär Regionalwissenschaften, Regionalstudien
- Sozialwissenschaften Politikwissenschaft Politikwissenschaft Allgemein
- Sozialwissenschaften Soziologie | Soziale Arbeit Spezielle Soziologie Stadt- und Regionalsoziologie
- Rechtswissenschaften Recht, Rechtswissenschaft Allgemein
Weitere Infos & Material
Introduction: The Appeal of International Toleration 1. On Toleration: Concept and Conceptions 2. Political Liberalism and the Partition Model 3. A Liberal Theory of International Toleration: Meaning and Desiderata 4. The Liberal Theory of International Toleration: A Candidate 5. Reconstructing the Liberal Theory of International Toleration. Conclusion: The Difficulty of International Toleration