Barss Anaphora

A Reference Guide
1. Auflage 2008
ISBN: 978-0-470-75462-7
Verlag: John Wiley & Sons
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: Adobe DRM (»Systemvoraussetzungen)

E-Book, Englisch, 304 Seiten, E-Book

Reihe: Explaining Linguistics

Anaphora: A Reference Guide is a collection of essays that report on the major results of recent research in anaphora and set the stage for further inquiry.
* Reports on the major results of recent research in anaphora and sets the stage for further inquiry.
* Features contributions from among the world's leading researchers on anaphora.
* Presents an exciting picture of how broad the phenomenon of anaphora is and how it can reveal many mysterious properties of language.
* Includes articles of interest to many disciplines, including philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, cognitive science, linguistics, language studies, cognitive psychology, and psycholinguistics.

Autoren/Hrsg.

Barss, Andrew

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Notes on Contributors.
Preface.
Acknowledgments.
1. Timing Puzzles in Anaphora and Interpretation (AndrewBarss).
2. Two Types o0f Scrambling Constructions in Japanese (AyumiUeyama).
3. The Psycholinguistics of Anaphora (Janet L. Nicol and DavidA. Swinney).
4. Two Pronominal Mysteries in the Acquisition of Binding andControl (Dana McDaniel).
5. Reference Transfers and the Giorgione Problem (MarioMontalbetti).
6. Tense and Anaphora: Is There a Tense-Specific Theory ofCoreference (Karen Zagona).
7. Surface and Deep Anaphora, Sloppy Identity, and Experimentsin Syntax (Hajime Hoji).
8. The Logic of Reflexivity and Reciprocity (D. TerenceLangendoen and Joel Magloire).
References.
Index.

Über Autor(innen)

Andrew Barss is Associate Professor of Linguistics and Associate Research Social Scientist in Cognitive Science at the University of Arizona. His research interests include anaphora, movement phenomena, and scope; the syntax of logical form; derivational models of syntax and their relation to performance models; and competition-based models of syntactic form and the constraints they impose on semantic interpretation.