Criminal Profiling

International Theory, Research, and Practice
1. Auflage 2007
ISBN: 978-1-60327-146-2
Verlag: Humana Press
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: Adobe DRM (»Systemvoraussetzungen)

E-Book, Englisch, 418 Seiten

International Perspectives into the Practice and Research of Criminal Profiling Today criminal profiling is no longer viewed as some secretive, mysterious technique that police from the United States of America exc- sively indulge in when seeking to solve high-profile aberrant forms of crime. Although popular culture representations of criminal profiling still mostly favor such depictions by emphasizing this context, the reality is that individuals from a range of occupational and disciplinary backgrounds from around the world are involved in the practice loosely referred to as “criminal profiling. ” Different nomenclature is adopted from time to time to describe essentially the same practice such as “offender profiling,” “psychological profiling,” “pers- ality profiling,” and “crime analysis,” and indeed different techniques are often employed, but nonetheless as an endeavor profiling has expanded both in app- cation and in popularity across the world. Criminal profiling has evolved chiefly because researchers and comm- tators from around the globe have spent many years examining the perpetrators of serious crimes such as murder, rape, and arson. In particular, they have concentrated their efforts on studying the motivations and actions of violent offenders while seeking to document the experiences of both the victims and the perpetrators of crime. Many have also sought to assess the input of inv- tigative experience employed in criminal investigations and the influence of expert witnesses on jury decisions and examined at length the assessment and treatment of the protagonists of crime.

Autoren/Hrsg.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

1;0kcrpre.pdf;2
1.1;Preface;7
1.2;Contents;9
1.3;Notes on Contributors;13
2;0kcr01.pdf;20
2.1;PartI Profiling Crimes of Violence;20
2.1.1;Homicidal Syndromes;21
2.1.1.1;G.B. Palermo;21
2.1.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION;21
2.1.1.1.2;S1OCIOLOGICAL T1HEORIES OF C1RIME;22
2.1.1.1.3;N1EUROBIOLOGICAL T1HEORIES OF V1IOLENT C1RIME;24
2.1.1.1.4;P1SYCHOLOGICAL T1HEORIES OF C1RIME;25
2.1.1.1.5;B1RIEF S1TATISTICS;26
2.1.1.1.6;S1POUSAL H1OMICIDE;27
2.1.1.1.7;H1OMICIDE R1ESULTING F1ROM J1EALOUS P1ARANOIA;28
2.1.1.1.8;F1ILICIDE;29
2.1.1.1.9;P1ARRICIDE;31
2.1.1.1.10;M1ATRICIDE;31
2.1.1.1.11;P1ATRICIDE;32
2.1.1.1.12;M1ULTIPLE H1OMICIDE;32
2.1.1.1.13;S1PREE K1ILLING;32
2.1.1.1.14;M1ASS M1URDER;33
2.1.1.1.15;S1ERIAL H1OMICIDE;37
2.1.1.1.16;C1ONCLUSIONS;40
2.1.1.1.17;R1EFERENCES;40
3;0kcr02.pdf;45
3.1;Offender Profiles and Crime Scene Patterns in Belgian Sexual Murders;45
3.1.1;F. Gerard et al.;45
3.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION;45
3.1.1.2;M1ETHOD;48
3.1.1.2.1;Data Collection;48
3.1.1.2.2;Procedures;49
3.1.1.3;R1ESULTS;50
3.1.1.3.1;Descriptive Statistical Analysis;50
3.1.1.3.2;Multi-Dimensional Scaling;53
3.1.1.4;D1ISCUSSION;59
3.1.1.4.1;Vignette One;61
3.1.1.4.2;Vignette Two;61
3.1.1.5;A1PPENDIX;63
3.1.1.5.1;Variable Labels and Description to Diagrams 1 and 2;63
3.1.1.6;R1EFERENCES;65
4;0kcr03.pdf;66
4.1;Profiling Sexual Fantasy;66
4.1.1;D. Gee and A. Belofastov;66
4.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION;66
4.1.1.2;S1EXUAL F1ANTASY AND D1EVIANT S1EXUAL F1ANTASY;67
4.1.1.3;T1HE F1ORMATION OF O1FFENSE-F1OCUSED S1EXUAL F1ANTASY;68
4.1.1.4;T1HE N1EXUS B1ETWEEN S1EXUAL F1ANTASY AND S1EXUAL O1FFENDING;69
4.1.1.5;S1EXUAL F1ANTASY AS AN A1DDICTION;71
4.1.1.6;A T1RIPARTITE M1ODEL OF S1EXUAL F1ANTASY IN S1EXUAL O1FFENDING;72
4.1.1.7;T1HE F1UNCTION OF S1EXUAL F1ANTASY;73
4.1.1.8;T1HE C1ONTENT OF S1EXUAL F1ANTASY;75
4.1.1.9;T1HE S1TRUCTURAL P1ROPERTIES OF S1EXUAL F1ANTASY;76
4.1.1.10;T1HE T1EMPORAL P1ROFILE OF S1EXUAL F1ANTASY IN O1FFENDING;77
4.1.1.11;I1MPLICATIONS OF THE SFSO M1ODEL FOR C1RIMINAL P1ROFILING;79
4.1.1.11.1;Modus Operandi;80
4.1.1.12;O1FFENDER S1IGNATURE;81
4.1.1.13;I1NFERRING M1OTIVE;84
4.1.1.14;C1ONCLUSION;85
5;0kcr04.pdf;89
5.1;Murder by Manual and Ligature Strangulation;89
5.1.1;H. Häkkänen;89
5.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION;89
5.1.1.2;P1RESENT R1ESEARCH;93
5.1.1.3;R1ESULTS;94
5.1.1.3.1;Victim Characteristics;94
5.1.1.3.2;Offender Characteristics;94
5.1.1.3.3;Offense Characteristics;95
5.1.1.4;D1ISCUSSION;96
5.1.1.5;R1EFERENCES;100
6;0kcr05.pdf;104
6.1;Criminal Propensity and Criminal Opportunity;104
6.1.1;E. Beauregard et al.;104
6.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION;104
6.1.1.1.1;Criminal Propensity and Sexual Aggression;105
6.1.1.1.2;Criminal Profiling and Sexual Aggression;106
6.1.1.1.3;Crime Scene Behaviors as a Reflection of Sexual Fantasies;107
6.1.1.1.4;The Personality Paradox;108
6.1.1.2;M1ETHOD;109
6.1.1.2.1;Participants;109
6.1.1.2.2;Procedures;109
6.1.1.2.3;Measures;111
6.1.1.2.4;Statistical Analysis;113
6.1.1.3;R1ESULTS;114
6.1.1.4;D1ISCUSSION;118
6.1.1.4.1;Criminal Propensity and Individual Differences;118
6.1.1.4.2;Criminal Opportunity;120
6.1.1.4.3;Criminal Profiling and the ``Homology Assumption'';120
6.1.1.5;C1ONCLUSIONS;121
6.1.1.6;R1EFERENCES;123
7;0kcr06.pdf;129
7.1;PartI New Techniques and Applications;20
7.1.1;Case Linkage;7
7.1.1.1;J. Woodhams et al.;7
7.1.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION;130
7.1.1.1.2;T1HE P1ROCESS OF C1ASE L1INKAGE;132
7.1.1.1.3;T1HE T1HEORY OF C1ASE L1INKAGE;135
7.1.1.1.4;E1VALUATING C1ASE L1INKAGE;136
7.1.1.1.5;O1BSTACLES TO L1INKING C1RIMES;138
7.1.1.1.5.1;Data Limitations;138
7.1.1.1.5.2;Geographical Obstacles;140
7.1.1.1.5.3;Obstacles in the Courtroom;140
7.1.1.1.6;T1HE F1UTURE OF C1ASE L1INKAGE;143
8;0kcr07.pdf;147
8.1;Predicting Offender Profiles From Offense and Victim Characteristics;147
8.1.1;D.P. Farrington and S. Lambert;147
8.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION;147
8.1.1.2;T1HE P1RESENT R1ESEARCH;149
8.1.1.3;C1HARACTERISTICS 1OF B1URGLARY 1AND V1IOLENCE O1FFENDERS;152
8.1.1.4;D1EVELOPING 1AN O1FFENDER P1ROFILE;154
8.1.1.5;L1OCATION 1OF 1THE O1FFENSE V1ERSUS A1DDRESS1OF 1THE O1FFENDER;155
8.1.1.6;C1HARACTERISTICS 1OF 1THE O1FFENSE V1ERSUS C1HARACTERISTICS 1OF 1THE O1FFENDER;157
8.1.1.7;O1FFENSE V1ERSUS O1FFENDER P1ROFILES;163
8.1.1.8;C1HARACTERISTICS 1OF 1THE V1ICTIM V1ERSUS C1HARACTERISTICS1OF 1THE O1FFENDER;165
8.1.1.9;T1O W1HAT E1XTENT 1DO O1FFENDERS R1EPEAT S1IMILAR T1YPES1OF O1FFENSES?;169
8.1.1.10;T1O W1HAT E1XTENT 1DO O1FFENDERS R1EPEAT S1IMILAR T1YPES1OF V1ICTIMS?;172
8.1.1.11;O1THER A1NALYSES R1ELEVANT 1TO O1FFENDER P1ROFILING;173
8.1.1.12;C1ONCLUSIONS;175
9;0kcr08.pdf;180
9.1;Criminal Profilingin a Terrorism Context;180
9.1.1;G. Dean;180
9.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION;180
9.1.1.2;P1ROFILING T1ERRORISTS;181
9.1.1.2.1;A Brief History of Terrorism;181
9.1.1.3;A1PPLYING P1ROFILING P1ARADIGM TO T1ERRORISTS;183
9.1.1.4;D1EFINITIONAL D1IFFICULTIES;183
9.1.1.5;C1ONCEPTUAL C1ONFUSION;185
9.1.1.6;P1SYCHOLOGICAL D1ISTURBANCE;185
9.1.1.7;P1ROFILING T1ERRORISM;187
9.1.1.8;M1ULTI-C1ONTEXT M1ODEL 1OF S1YSTEMIC T1ERRORISM;187
9.1.1.9;JI T1ERRORIST N1ETWORK 1IN S1INGAPORE;191
9.1.1.10;C1ONCLUSIONS;196
9.1.1.11;R1EFERENCES;198
10;0kcr09.pdf;200
10.1;Geographic Profiling of Terrorist Attacks;200
10.1.1;C. Bennell and S. Corey;200
10.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION;200
10.1.1.2;A B1RIEF I1NTRODUCTION TO G1EOGRAPHIC P1ROFILING;201
10.1.1.3;C1OMPUTERIZED G1EOGRAPHIC P1ROFILING A1SSUMPTIONS;203
10.1.1.4;A1PPLYING C1OMPUTERIZED G1EOGRAPHIC P1ROFILING TO T1ERRORIST A1TTACKS;204
10.1.1.4.1;Assumptions that will Frequently be Met;204
10.1.1.4.2;Assumptions that will Only Sometimes be Met;205
10.1.1.5;C1ASE S1TUDIES;206
10.1.1.6;C1ASE S1TUDY 1: A1CTION D1IRECTE;207
10.1.1.7;C1ASE S1TUDY 2: T1HE R1EVOLUTIONARY P1EOPLE'S S1TRUGGLE;208
10.1.1.8;C1ONCLUSIONS;210
11;0kcr10.pdf;215
11.1;PartIII Legal and Policy Considerations for Criminal Profiling;215
11.1.1;Criminal Profiling as Expert Evidence?;216
11.1.1.1;C.B. Meyer;216
11.1.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION;216
11.1.1.1.2;C1RIMINAL P1ROFILING AS E1VIDENCE? A S1AMPLE OF I1NTERNATIONAL C1ASE L1AW;218
11.1.1.1.2.1;The United States of America;218
11.1.1.1.2.2;Canadian Cases;239
11.1.1.1.2.3;English Case Law;243
11.1.1.1.2.4;Australian Case Law;246
11.1.1.1.2.5;German Case Law;247
11.1.1.1.2.6;Swiss Case Law;248
11.1.1.1.3;C1ONCLUSIONS;249
11.1.1.1.4;R1EFERENCES;251
12;0kcr11.pdf;257
12.1;Criminal Profiling;257
12.1.1;A.M.R. Paclebar et al.;257
12.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION;257
12.1.1.2;P1ROFILING T1ESTIMONY 1AND J1URORS;258
12.1.1.3;T1HIS S1TUDY;259
12.1.1.4;M1ETHOD;260
12.1.1.4.1;Participants;260
12.1.1.4.2;Design and Procedure;260
12.1.1.5;M1ATERIALS;261
12.1.1.5.1;Case Summary;261
12.1.1.5.2;Post-Trial Questionnaire;262
12.1.1.6;R1ESULTS;263
12.1.1.6.1;Profiling Evidence and Beliefs in Guilt;263
12.1.1.6.2;Influence and Importance of Profiling Testimony;265
12.1.1.6.3;Do Jurors Critically Evaluate Profiling Testimony?;266
12.1.1.7;D1ISCUSSION;266
13;0kcr12.pdf;271
13.1;The Phenomenon of Serial Murder and the Judicial Admission of Criminal Profiling in Italy;271
13.1.1;A. Zappalà and D. Bosco;271
13.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION: THE C1ONCEPT OF C1RIMINAL P1ROFILING;271
13.1.1.2;S1ERIAL M1URDER 1IN I1TALY: D1EFINING AND A1SSESSING1THE P1HENOMENA;273
13.1.1.3;T1HE C1RIME A1NALYST: A N1EW E1XPERT W1ITNESS IN THE I1TALIAN C1RIMINAL J1USTICE S1YSTEM;275
13.1.1.4;C1ONCLUSIONS;279
14;0kcr13.pdf;281
14.1;Criminal Profiling and Public Policy;281
14.1.1;J.B. Bumgarner;281
14.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION;281
14.1.1.2;T1HE P1UBLIC P1OLICY P1ROCESS;282
14.1.1.3;T1HE E1XECUTIVE B1RANCH;284
14.1.1.4;H1IGH-P1ROFILE O1CCURRENCES;285
14.1.1.5;T1HE L1EGISLATIVE B1RANCH;288
14.1.1.6;T1HE J1UDICIARY;291
14.1.1.7;C1ONCLUSIONS;293
14.1.1.8;R1EFERENCES;294
15;0kcr14.pdf;296
15.1;The Observations of the French Judiciary;296
15.1.1;L. Montet and R.N. Kocsis;296
15.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION 134134;296
15.1.1.2;N1O P1RECISE D1EFINITION 1FOR C1RIMINAL P1ROFILING?;298
15.1.1.3;T1HE I1NVENTION 1OF C1RIMINAL P1ROFILING 1BY 1THE FBI?;300
15.1.1.4;D1ISRUPTION 1TO 1THE F1RENCH J1UDICIAL S1YSTEM;301
15.1.1.5;S1OLUTION: C1RIMINAL P1ROFILING 1BY P1OLICE P1ERSONNEL O1NLY?;302
15.1.1.6;C1ONCLUSIONS;305
15.1.1.7;A1PPENDIX;305
15.1.1.8;R1EFERENCES;308
16;0kcr15.pdf;310
16.1;The Image of Profiling;310
16.1.1;J.S. Herndon;310
16.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION;310
16.1.1.2;P1ROFILING IN M1OVIES;311
16.1.1.3;P1ROFILING IN N1OVELS;313
16.1.1.4;P1ROFILING IN N1ON-F1ICTIONAL/B1IOGRAPHICAL B1OOKS;314
16.1.1.5;P1ROFILING ON TV---F1ICTIONAL;318
16.1.1.6;TV---D1OCUMENTARY;320
16.1.1.7;P1ROFILING IN M1AGAZINES/P1ERIODICALS;323
16.1.1.8;P1ROFILING IN N1EWSMAGAZINES;324
16.1.1.9;P1ROFILING---ON B1ALANCE;325
16.1.1.10;R1EFERENCES;327
17;0kcr16.pdf;331
17.1;PartIV Critiques and Conceptual Dimensions to Criminal Profiling;331
17.1.1;Contemporary Problems in Criminal Profiling*;332
17.1.1.1;R.N. Kocsis and G.B. Palermo;332
17.1.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION;332
17.1.1.1.2;W1HAT 1IS P1ROFILING?;333
17.1.1.1.3;D1OES P1ROFILING W1ORK?;333
17.1.1.1.3.1;Validity;334
17.1.1.1.3.2;Utility;335
17.1.1.1.4;D1ISCUSSION;337
17.1.1.1.4.1;Brilliant Insights, Common Sense, or Just Cold-Reading?;337
17.1.1.1.4.2;Mountains of Conclusions From Molehills of Research;338
17.1.1.1.4.3;Research With Limited Application;338
17.1.1.1.4.4;How Reliable is the Data?;339
17.1.1.1.4.5;Uniform Definitions: An Absence of Parity;340
17.1.1.1.4.6;Inductive Versus Deductive Profiling: Does Sucha Distinction Exist?;341
17.1.1.1.4.7;Who Owns Profiling?;342
17.1.1.1.4.8;Professionalism;342
17.1.1.1.4.9;An Absence of Regulation;343
17.1.1.1.5;C1ONCLUSIONS;344
18;0kcr17.pdf;351
18.1;Fine-Tuning Geographical Profiling;351
18.1.1;Fine-Tuning Geographical Profiling;351
18.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION;351
18.1.1.2;G1EOGRAPHICAL P1ROFILING W1ITH L1ITTLE T1HEORY;352
18.1.1.3;D1ISTANCE D1ECAY;354
18.1.1.4;G1EOGRAPHICAL P1ROFILING W1ITH M1ORE T1HEORY;355
18.1.1.5;T1HE O1FFENDER'S R1OUTINE A1CTIVITY;357
18.1.1.6;G1EOGRAPHICAL P1ROFILING W1ITHOUT C1OMPUTING;358
18.1.1.7;T1WO T1YPES OF C1RIMINALS;359
18.1.1.8;P1RACTICAL P1ROBLEMS;360
18.1.1.9;D1EVIANT O1FFENDERS;361
18.1.1.10;D1EVIATING C1IRCUMSTANCES;362
18.1.1.11;C1ONCLUSIONS;363
19;0kcr18.pdf;369
19.1;Skills and Accuracy in Criminal Profiling*;369
19.1.1;R.N. Kocsis;369
19.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION;369
19.1.1.2;W1HY 1HAS P1ROFILING D1EVELOPED D1ESPITE L1ITTLE E1MPIRICAL E1VIDENCE 1FOR I1TS V1ALIDITY 1AND W1HY 1IS T1HERE 1A N1EED1FOR S1UCH R1ESEARCH?;371
19.1.1.3;P1AST E1MPIRICAL E1XAMINATIONS 1OF P1ROFILING;372
19.1.1.4;N1EW E1MPIRICAL R1ESEARCH;373
19.1.1.5;W1HAT S1KILLS 1OR S1PECIAL A1PTITUDES M1IGHT B1E U1SEFUL 1IN C1ONSTRUCTING 1AN A1CCURATE P1ROFILE?;374
19.1.1.6;T1HE P1ERFORMANCE 1OF P1ROFESSIONAL P1ROFILERS;376
19.1.1.7;T1HE Q1UINTESSENTIAL S1KILL 1OF I1NVESTIGATIVE E1XPERIENCE;379
19.1.1.8;S1CIENCE S1OPHOMORES 1AND 1THE C1APACITY 1FOR L1OGICAL1AND O1BJECTIVE R1EASONING;380
19.1.1.9;P1SYCHIC D1ETECTIVES: A1RE T1HEY B1ETTER T1HAN B1ARTENDERS?;381
19.1.1.10;L1IMITATIONS 1AND D1IRECTIONS 1FOR 1THE F1UTURE;382
19.1.1.11;C1ONCLUSIONS;383
20;0kcr19.pdf;387
20.1;Investigative Experienceand Profile Accuracy;387
20.1.1;D. Gogan;387
20.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION;387
20.1.1.2;M1ETHODS;389
20.1.1.2.1;Participants;389
20.1.1.2.2;Materials;390
20.1.1.2.3;Procedure;390
20.1.1.3;R1ESULTS;391
20.1.1.4;D1ISCUSSION;393
20.1.1.5;R1EFERENCES;395
21;0kcr20.pdf;397
21.1;Schools of Thought Related to Criminal Profiling;397
21.1.1;R.N. Kocsis;397
21.1.1.1;I1NTRODUCTION;397
21.1.1.2;C1LINICAL P1ERSPECTIVES I1NTO C1RIMINAL P1ROFILING;399
21.1.1.3;C1RIMINAL I1NVESTIGATIVE A1NALYSIS;400
21.1.1.4;I1NVESTIGATIVE P1SYCHOLOGY;401
21.1.1.5;C1RIME A1CTION P1ROFILING;403
21.1.1.6;C1ONCLUSIONS;405
21.1.1.7;R1EFERENCES;406
22;0kcrind.pdf;409
22.1;Index;409