González Quintero Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant

A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics
1. Auflage 2022
ISBN: 978-3-030-89750-5
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: 1 - PDF Watermark

E-Book, Englisch, Band 449, 268 Seiten, eBook

Reihe: Synthese Library

This book offers an unprecedented study of the influence of the skepticism of the New Platonic Academy on David Hume’s and Immanuel Kant’s critiques of metaphysics. By demonstrating how the skeptical teachings of the Academy affected these authors’ Enlightened attacks on traditional metaphysics, this book deepens and broadens the burgeoning scholarship on the role that the Ancients schools of skepticism played in the configuration of Modern skeptical outlooks. It bolsters the newfound recognition that we must reconsider the conventional view that the revival of Pyrrhonism in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries gave birth to Modern skepticism by incorporating the influence of Academic skepticism in the analysis. Giving a new impetus to this line of research, the author argues that Academic ideas and methods informed Hume’s and Kant’s critique of metaphysics in substantial and thus far unacknowledged ways. Specifically, she demonstrates the centrality of Academic skepticismto Hume’s epistemology and critique of religion through a detailed analysis of his theory of belief in the  Treatise  and the first  Enquiry  as well as of its  application in the  Dialogues concerning Natural Religion . Likewise, her analysis reveals how Kant’s anti-metaphysical stance, developed in the Transcendental Dialectic of the  Critique of Pure Reason , contains many skeptical insights of Academic inspiration, bequeathed to him by Hume.

Zielgruppe

Research

Autoren/Hrsg.

González Quintero, Catalina

Inhaltsverzeichnis

1. Introduction.- 2. The Skepticism of the New Academy: From Epoche to Persuasion.- 3. Academic Skepticism and Metaphysics: On the Gods and the Immortal Soul.- 4. Hume's Academic Skepticism: A Normative Theory of Belief.- 5. Hume and Cicereo on Metaphysics: Philo's Non-dogmatic Deism.- 6. Skepticism vs. Skeptical Method: Sources of Ancient and Modern Skepticism in Kant.- 7. Kant’s Critical Solution to the Antinomies as an Academic Response to the Apraxia Objection.- 8.  Conclusion.

Über Autor(innen)

Catalina GonzálezQuintero earned her Ph.D. in Philosophy from Emory University in the United States of America and is currently an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Universidad de los Andes in Bogotá, Colombia. Her research focuses on the history of Modern philosophy, particularly in the areas of skepticism and rhetoric. She has published various articles and book chapters on the philosophy of Cicero, Kant, Hume, and Vico in U.S., European, and Latin American journals, and compilations published by Springer, Palgrave, De Gruyter, SUNY Press, Lawrence Erlbaum, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, and Universidad de los Andes.