Economic Voting

Erscheinungsjahr 2016
ISBN: 978-1-107-14819-2
Verlag: Cambridge University Press

Buch, Englisch, 232 Seiten, Format (B × H): 157 mm x 235 mm, Gewicht: 533 g

The conventional wisdom of economic voting theory argues that a nation's economic performance drives electoral outcomes. Therefore, voters will hold an administration accountable for its economic stewardship. Austin Hart challenges the simplicity of this notion, drawing on cognitive-psychological research on priming to demonstrate that the intensity of voters' exposure to economic campaign messages systematically conditions the strength of the economic vote. However, this study goes further than simply saying 'campaigns matter'. Here, we learn that candidates who control the campaign narrative can capitalize on favorable economic conditions or - contrary to the predictions of conventional theory - overcome unfavorable conditions. Although the aim is not to dismiss the importance of structural variables in the study of elections, Hart shows that the choices candidates make about what to say and how often shape election outcomes in ways that cannot be explained by contextual or institutional forces alone.

Autoren/Hrsg.

Hart, Austin

Fachgebiete

• Wirtschaftswissenschaften Volkswirtschaftslehre Volkswirtschaftslehre Allgemein
• Sozialwissenschaften Politikwissenschaft Politische Systeme Wahlen und Volksabstimmungen
• Sozialwissenschaften Politikwissenschaft Politische Systeme Politische Parteien

Inhaltsverzeichnis

1. The economic voting puzzle; 2. A campaign-centered theory of economic voting; 3. Can ads prime the economy? How would we know? US 1992; 4. The impact of a surge in economic messages, Mexico 2006; 5. The absent economic message, US and Mexico 2000; 6. The campaign-centered model in comparative perspective; 7. Conclusion.

Über Autor(innen)

Hart, Austin
Austin Hart is Assistant Professor of Quantitative Methods in the School of International Service at American University, Washington DC. His research examines the criteria voters use to evaluate their representatives and the extent to which politicians can use mass communication to manipulate those criteria. His work also appears in the Journal of Politics and Comparative Political Studies.