Kaminsky Where in the World is the Berlin Wall?

170 Sites around the World
3. Auflage 2014
ISBN: 978-3-95723-186-4
Verlag: Berlin Story Verlag
Format: EPUB
Kopierschutz: 6 - ePub Watermark

E-Book, Englisch, 352 Seiten

A symbol of freedom, of the human strength of will and a relic of the Cold War. Countless pieces of the Berlin Wall were scattered around the globe after the Wall fell in 1989. These pieces of Wall embody the Berliners fight for freedom. More than 240 of these sections - each weighing tonnes - can be found in over 140 countries and on every continent. They have been located for this book. Amongst those who now own sections of the Wall are Japanese businessmen, famous art collectors and all US Presidents from the last century. There are some exciting and strange, but also tragic stories behind the pieces of the Wall. The stories in this book highlight the many ways in which the Wall has been used to commemorate the Berlin Wall and the Cold War.

Herausgeberin Dr. Anna Kaminsky - Studium an der Sektion Theoretische und angewandte Sprachwissenschaft (Schwerpunkt romanische Sprachen) an der Karl-Marx-Universität in Leipzig, 1992 Promotion Dr. phil. 1993 bis 1998 Mitarbeit in verschiedenen Forschungs- und Ausstellungsprojekten u.a. am Berliner Institut für vergleichende Sozialforschung, an der Universität Münster, der Gedenkstätte Sachsenhausen und am Deutschen Historischen Museum, seit 1998 wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin, seit 2001 Geschäftsführerin der Bundesstiftung zur Aufarbeitung der SED-Diktatur.

Autoren/Hrsg.

Kaminsky, Anna

Leseproben

“THERE ARE PLENTY OF GOOD REASONS NOT TO LOSE SIGHT OF THE 13TH AUGUST”1

REMEMBERING THE WALL SINCE 1990

Anna Kaminsky

“Some of you will have asked yourselves: Why has the Enquête Commission of the German Bundestag been campaigning so hard to remember the building of the Berlin Wall 35 years ago today? Is it not enough that the first Enquête Commission tried to analyse the event in several expert groups and hearings? Is the 17th June not an appropriate day to remember everything carried out by the SED dictatorship until its downfall in autumn 1989? I think there are plenty of good reasons not to lose sight of the 13th August.”2

FROM 9TH-13TH AUGUST

During his welcome speech at a commemoration service in the Bundestag in 1996, Rainer Eppelmann used these words to justify the committee’s decision to use the 35th anniversary of the building of the Wall as an opportunity to both remember and to dedicate a number of events to it. Now another 25 years later, the memory of the building of the Wall and life in the divided city and a divided world has reclaimed its place not just in the city’s memory. Moreover, in the 50th year after the Wall was built, remembering the period around its construction received greater attention in research and from the media than the uprisings of 17th June 1953.

The actual division of the city had been relegated to second place on the city’s self-image agenda years before, but the situation seemed to have changed by the 50th anniversary of the building of the Wall. One sign was that the lead-up to the anniversary had pushed other events into the background of public discourse. It was also now apparent that the “demolition of the Wall”, particularly in the first years after the fall of the Wall, led to new demands for its reconstruction of the Wall in order to make it possible to “experience history”, as called for by the former governing mayor of Berlin, Eberhard Diepgen.3

Despite various ideas of how to keep the memory of the Wall and the division alive, it seems as though the city has found its way back to its traumatic history after 20 years. Forgotten are the first 15 years after the Fall of the Wall which were characterised by the attempts to completely eradicate all traces of the construction and the division of the city which lasted 28 years. Before this, commemorating the Wall had only been a topic for victim’s associations, private societies and a few concerned citizens. Whilst public events mainly celebrated the Fall of the Wall, public attention only turned to the 13th of August by way of detour on the 9th of November. The joy and euphoria over the fall of the Wall, coupled with the nostalgia that emerged in the 1990s, seemed to obscure the fact that what was brought down in November 1989 was a dictatorship that denied its citizens basic human rights and had those who tried to flee the sealed-off country shot or given long prison sentences.

SO WHERE WAS THE WALL?

The images from the night of 9th-10th November 1989 are equally as iconic in world history as those from 12th-13th August 1961.

The crowds of people streaming through the open border crossings, sitting and dancing on the crest of the Wall, are as much a part of the public’s memory as the people standing frozen in front of the rolls of barbed wire in 1961 or the residents jumping out of the windows on Bernauer Straße, who saw these lethal jumps as the only way to get to the West and thus to freedom.

Although it was by no means a forgone conclusion to SED rulers in the GDR that the Wall and the border would remain open, deliberations were already being made on 10th November as to what should happen to this “historical monstrosity”. Whilst Willy Brandt – then the reigning mayor of West Berlin – called for sections of the Wall to be preserved as a memorial in his speech in front of the Schöneberg City Hall, others were already thinking of turning the Wall into a business. And so, on 10th November 1989, the first enquiries were sent from Bavaria to the GDR government offering cash in return for “unwanted pieces of your border fortifications no longer needed”.4 Finally, on November 14th, 1989, a business consultant approached the GDR’s Permanent Mission in Bonn and recommended - since the trade in parts of the Berlin Wall could no longer be stopped – that the GDR side should nevertheless consider “with all its ambivalence” that the “trade will be made with sections of the Wall, no matter where they come from. I consider it therefore all the more reasonable to make money from it.”5

Almost overnight, the Wall became a highly sought-after object, a trophy of the Cold War, an export hit and a symbol. If, during its 29 years in existence, the Wall had simply been a symbol of the Socialist system’s inhumanity and oppression, it had become a symbol of civil courage and the will for freedom overnight. No other construction in Germany, and perhaps Europe, had such grave consequences on so many people in the second half of the 20th century. No other construction from this period became a symbol of oppression and dictatorship, contempt for basic human rights and, finally, for taking hostage of millions of people by a regime formed on injustice. After the Fall of the Wall, no other construction went from being a symbol of oppression and contempt for mankind to a symbol of the will for freedom and civil courage.

In the weeks and months after the Wall fell, requests from all over the world for pieces of the Wall increased and on 7th December / 4th January 1990, the GDR government, under Hans Modrow, decided to sell it. It was hoped that selling the Wall would help save the GDR economy which was heading towards bankruptcy. With offers of up to 500,000 Deutsche Mark per section6, these hopes were warranted.

Since the political development by the end of 1989 had already shown that the SED regime could no longer be saved, and, furthermore, that not only the Berlin Wall, but the entire Inner-German border had been opened, dismantling what was once the most heavily guarded border was at the top of the agenda.

It was immediately suggested that at least part of the costs of dismantling the fortifications should be financed by selling the Wall.

The GDR government launched an information campaign around Christmas 1989 to outline the reasons for the sale of the Berlin Wall to the angry and rattled people in the GDR. The campaign aimed to pick up points made in the letters of complaint received by the government and justify the sale of the Wall to which the government saw no alternative.

Anger at the sale of the Wall was directed at the government who had locked in its citizens for decades, ruthlessly shot at escapees and who now wanted to sell this “Wall of shame” – at which people had been murdered – in order to make money. The government used three arguments to justify selling the Wall to the western World:

1) The GDR’s need for foreign exchange,

2) the Wall is public property and, therefore

3) any profit made by the sale would go to the entire GDR population, Social projects, for example, would therefore benefit from such a sale.

Irrespective of any further reservations about the sale of the Wall, the border troops in Berlin-Mitte – whose job had been to protect the Wall and prevent anyone penetrating the border until December 19897 – began work on dismantling the Wall in January 1990. It started with particularly sought-after parts, which had been painted by mural artists. The majority of the concrete sections were crushed and used, amongst other things, for road and motorway construction.

In less than a year, that which once had once separated people along a 156-kilometres-long border and was made up of 54,000 concrete segments – each 2.6 tonnes in weight and 3.2 metres in height – had all but disappeared from the city landscape. Other objects to disappear included hundreds of kilometres of barbed wire and strips of lighting, equipment used to harness guard dogs and 186 watch towers from which guards had shot live-ammunition.

The desire for the city to return to some sort of normality after the long years of division was quite understandable. In 1990, very few could have imagined that there would one day be calls for the city and its people to make their wound visible once more. Removing the Wall from the city completely seemed a suitable way to overcome the division and its consequences as quickly as possible.

It was not only visitors to Berlin, whose interest in the Wall was warranted, who were increasingly perplexedly and asking: “So, where was the Wall?” At the same time, people had to accept that the notion of what the Wall had meant to the city and its people had faded considerably.

THE CONFLICT SURROUNDING COMMEMORATING THE WALL

From very early on, some had voiced their opinion that the Wall should be preserved, at least in some areas of the city, as a memorial.

Willy Brandt was the Mayor of Berlin at the time and, on 10th November...