Liebe Besucherinnen und Besucher,
aufgrund unseres Sommerfestes sind wir am 03. September 2026 bis 14 Uhr erreichbar. Am 04. September 2026 sind wir wieder wie gewohnt für Sie da. Vielen Dank für Ihr Verständnis.
Ihr Team von Sack Fachmedien
E-Book, Englisch, Band 36, 216 Seiten
Niaz Critical Appraisal of Physical Science as a Human Enterprise
2009
ISBN: 978-1-4020-9626-6
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: 1 - PDF Watermark
Dynamics of Scientific Progress
E-Book, Englisch, Band 36, 216 Seiten
Reihe: Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education
ISBN: 978-1-4020-9626-6
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: 1 - PDF Watermark
It is generally believed that doing science means accumulating empirical data with no or little reference to the interpretation of the data based on the scientist's th- retical framework or presuppositions. Holton (1969a) has deplored the widely accepted myth (experimenticism) according to which progress in science is presented as the inexorable result of the pursuit of logically sound conclusions from un- biguous experimental data. Surprisingly, some of the leading scientists themselves (Millikan is a good example) have contributed to perpetuate the myth with respect to modern science being essentially empirical, that is carefully tested experim- tal facts (free of a priori conceptions), leading to inductive generalizations. Based on the existing knowledge in a field of research a scientist formulates the guiding assumptions (Laudan et al. , 1988), presuppositions (Holton, 1978, 1998) and 'hard core' (Lakatos, 1970) of the research program that constitutes the imperative of presuppositions, which is not abandoned in the face of anomalous data. Laudan and his group consider the following paraphrase of Kant by Lakatos as an important guideline: philosophy of science without history of science is empty. Starting in the 1960s, this 'historical school' has attempted to redraw and replace the positivist or logical empiricist image of science that dominated for the first half of the twentieth century. Among other aspects, one that looms large in these studies is that of 'guiding assumptions' and has considerable implications for the main thesis of this monograph (Chapter 2).
Autoren/Hrsg.
Weitere Infos & Material
1;Acknowledgments;7
2;Contents;8
3;Introduction;14
4;Quantitative Imperative Versus the Imperative of Presuppositions;21
5;Understanding Scientific Progress: From Duhem to Lakatos;39
6;Kinetic Theory: Maxwell’s Presuppositions;56
7;Periodic Table of the Chemical Elements: From Mendeleev to Moseley;65
8;Foundations of Modern Atomic Theory: Thomson, Rutherford, and Bohr;84
9;Determination of the Elementary Electrical Charge: Millikan and Ehrenhaft*;105
10;Paradox of the Photoelectric Effect: Einstein and Millikan;128
11;Bending of Light in the 1919 Eclipse Experiments: Einstein and Eddington;134
12;Lewis’s Covalent Bond: From Transfer of Electrons to Sharing of Electrons;145
13;Quantum Mechanics: From Bohr to Bohm;155
14;Wave–Particle Duality: De Broglie, Einstein, and Schrödinger;164
15;Searching for Quarks: Perl’s Philosophy of Speculative Experiments;171
16;Conclusion: Inductive Method as a Chimera;179
17;References;191
18;Author Index;208
19;Subject Index;213




