Pereira Roders / Bandarin Reshaping Urban Conservation

The Historic Urban Landscape Approach in Action
1. Auflage 2019
ISBN: 978-981-10-8887-2
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: 1 - PDF Watermark

E-Book, Englisch, Band 2, 591 Seiten

Reihe: Creativity, Heritage and the City

This volume focuses on the implementation of the 2011 UNESCO Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape (HUL approach), designed to foster the integration of heritage management in regional and urban planning and management, and strengthen the role of heritage in sustainable urban development.Earlier publications and research looked at the underlying theory of why the HUL approach was needed and how this theory was developed and elaborated by UNESCO. A comprehensive analysis was carried out in consultation with a multitude of actors in the twenty-first-century urban scene and with disciplinary approaches that are available to heritage managers and practitioners to implement the HUL approach.This volume aims to be empirical, describing, analyzing, and comparing 28 cities taken as case studies to implement the HUL approach. From those cases, many lessons can be learned and much guidance shared on best practices concerning what can be done to make the HUL approach work.Whereas the previous studies served to illustrate issues and challenges, in this volume the studies point to innovations in regional and urban planning and management that can allow cities to avoid major conflicts and to further develop in competitiveness. These accomplishments have been possible by building partnerships, devising financial strategies, and using heritage as a key resource in sustainable urban development, to name but a few effective strategies.For these reasons, this volume is primarily pragmatic, linked to the daily work and challenges of practitioners and administrators, using specific cases to assess what was and is good about current practices and what can be improved, in accordance with the HUL approach and aims.

Ana Pereira Roders is full Professor of heritage and values at Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), the Netherlands. She is also currently member of the governing board of the International Centre on Space Technology for Natural and Cultural Heritage (HIST), Chinese Academy of Sciences, China. Ana has a wide range of work experience abroad and interdisciplinary cooperation, spanning the fields of architecture, urban planning, law, environmental management and computer sciences. Since 2008, Ana cooperates closely with UNESCO and the World Heritage Centre in particular, concerning primarily the 1972 World Heritage Convention and the 2011 Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape. She led the creation of global platforms such as Protected Urban Planet (2011) and the Global Observatory on the Historic Urban Landscape (GO-HUL, 2015). Ana is the founding co-editor of the Journal Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, published by Emerald. She presented in 2015 at TEDxHamburg 'How cities become resource efficient'. Recently, she joined the RegioStars Awards 2018, European Commission, as senior jury member, under the category 'Cultural Heritage'. Her recent publications include: Going Beyond: Perceptions of Sustainability in Heritage Studies (part 2), co-authored with Marie-Theres Albert and Francesco Bandarin, also published by Springer in 2017.Francesco Bandarin is an architect and urban planner, specialized in urban conservation. He holds degrees in Architecture (Venice, IUAV) and City and Regional Planning, (UC Berkeley). He has been a Professor of Urban Planning and Urban Conservation at the University IUAV of Venice, Italy (1979-2016). From 2000 to 2018, he worked at UNESCO as Director of the World Heritage Centre and as Assistant Director-General for Culture. He is currently an Advisor for Urban Heritage of the UNESCO Director-General. He is a member of the Steering Committee of the Aga Khan Trust for Culture, and of the Board of the Fondazione Santagata for the Economics of Culture in Turin. He has served as a President of several international Juries, including the 2014 Venice Architecture Biennale and of the Shenzhen Creative Design Award (SCDA). His recent publications include The Historic Urban Landscape: Managing Heritage in an Urban Century, 2012, and Reconnecting the City: The Historic Urban Landscape Approach and the Future of Urban Heritage, 2015, both co-authored with Ron van Oers and published by Wiley-Blackwell.

Autoren/Hrsg.

Pereira Roders, Ana

Bandarin, Francesco

Inhaltsverzeichnis

1;Dedication;6
2;Preface;7
3;Acknowledgements;9
4;Contents;19
5;The Historic Urban Landscape Approach in Action: Charting the 28 Case Studies;22
6;About the Editors;25
7;Acronyms;27
8;Part I: Overview;34
8.1;Chapter 1: Reshaping Urban Conservation;35
8.1.1;1.1 Culture and the New Urban Conservation Paradigm;35
8.1.2;1.2 The Historic Urban Landscape: A Bottom-Up Approach to Urban Conservation;37
8.1.3;1.3 The Reasons for a New Urban Conservation Approach;38
8.1.4;1.4 Historic Urban Landscape: From Material to Social Expression;39
8.1.5;1.5 Urban Conservation and Sustainable Development;45
8.1.6;1.6 The Historic Urban Landscape Approach and the New Urban Agenda;48
8.1.7;1.7 The Historic Urban Landscape Approach and the International Policy Framework;51
8.1.8;References;51
8.2;Chapter 2: The Historic Urban Landscape Approach in Action: Eight Years Later;53
8.2.1;2.1 From Reality to Theory;53
8.2.2;2.2 From Theory to Supranational Governance;56
8.2.3;2.3 From Supranational Governance to Practices;57
8.2.4;2.4 From Practices to Theory;68
8.2.4.1;2.4.1 The Six-Step HUL Approach;72
8.2.4.2;2.4.2 The Tools;75
8.2.4.2.1;2.4.2.1 HUL Tools;75
8.2.4.3;2.4.3 The Stakeholders;78
8.2.4.3.1;2.4.3.1 Types of Stakeholders;78
8.2.5;2.5 From Theory to Reality;81
8.2.6;References;82
9;Part II: Case Studies on the Historic Urban Landscape Approach;87
9.1;Chapter 3: Rebuilding and Reconciliation in Old Aleppo: The Historic Urban Landscape Perspectives;88
9.1.1;3.1 Introduction;88
9.1.2;3.2 Aleppo World Heritage Site: A Brief History;89
9.1.3;3.3 World Heritage Designation Values;90
9.1.4;3.4 Destruction of Aleppo;92
9.1.5;3.5 Heritage Policy Documents;93
9.1.6;3.6 Old Aleppo as a Historic Urban Landscape Site;95
9.1.6.1;3.6.1 Old Aleppo and the Values of Heritage;95
9.1.6.1.1;3.6.1.1 Outstanding Universal Value;97
9.1.6.1.2;3.6.1.2 Authenticity and Integrity Values;97
9.1.6.1.3;3.6.1.3 Cultural and Social Values;98
9.1.6.1.4;3.6.1.4 Intangible Heritage and Values;99
9.1.6.1.5;3.6.1.5 Historic and Identity Values;99
9.1.6.1.6;3.6.1.6 Economic Values;100
9.1.7;3.7 Applying the Recommendation on Historic Urban Landscape: Post-conflict Reconciliation;100
9.1.7.1;3.7.1 Zone X1;101
9.1.7.2;3.7.2 Zone X2;102
9.1.7.3;3.7.3 Zone X3;103
9.1.8;3.8 Conclusions;105
9.1.9;References;106
9.2;Chapter 4: Amaravathi Heritage Town – Reflections on the Historic Cultural Landscape Approach;109
9.2.1;4.1 Introduction;109
9.2.2;4.2 Conceptual Framework;111
9.2.3;4.3 Amaravathi Heritage Town;112
9.2.4;4.4 Conclusion;118
9.2.5;References;119
9.3;Chapter 5: Toward a Special Management and Protection Plan of Urban Heritage in Ambalema, Colombia;121
9.3.1;5.1 Introduction;122
9.3.2;5.2 Special Management and Protection Plan (PEMP): Beyond Managing “Historic City Centers”;124
9.3.3;5.3 Ambalema’s Landscape: Between the River and the Snow Peaks;125
9.3.4;5.4 Identifying Heritage Values: A Holistic and Participative Within the HUL Framework;128
9.3.4.1;5.4.1 Citizen Engagement Strategy;128
9.3.4.2;5.4.2 Team Composition and Assessing Ambalema’s Heritage Values and Resources;133
9.3.4.3;5.4.3 Processing and Analyzing Information;133
9.3.5;5.5 Assessing the Vulnerability Status of Urban Heritage Values;134
9.3.5.1;5.5.1 Problem Tree Analysis for Ambalema;134
9.3.5.2;5.5.2 Identifying the Central Problem;134
9.3.6;5.6 Developing Policies and Actions;136
9.3.7;5.7 Conclusion;138
9.3.8;References;138
9.4;Chapter 6: Integrating Policy: The Historic Urban Landscape Approach in Amsterdam;140
9.4.1;6.1 Introduction: HUL as a Landscape Approach;141
9.4.2;6.2 Analysing Policy Practices: An Approach;142
9.4.3;6.3 HUL: Process in Practice, Practice in Process;143
9.4.4;6.4 The Heritage Concept in Practice;144
9.4.5;6.5 Participation in Heritage;145
9.4.6;6.6 HUL and the Integration of Urban and Heritage Policies;146
9.4.7;6.7 Reflecting On, and Learning With;148
9.4.8;References;150
9.5;Chapter 7: The Transformational Power of the HUL Approach: Lessons from Ballarat, Australia, 2012–2017;152
9.5.1;7.1 Introduction;152
9.5.1.1;7.1.1 Heritage Practice in Australia;155
9.5.1.2;7.1.2 Heritage Practice in Ballarat;157
9.5.2;7.2 Transforming Practice in Ballarat;159
9.5.2.1;7.2.1 Starting to Work with HUL;159
9.5.2.2;7.2.2 Actioning the HUL;160
9.5.2.2.1;7.2.2.1 Step 1: A New World of Knowledge;163
9.5.2.2.2;7.2.2.2 Step 2: Inclusion, Collaboration and Participation;164
9.5.2.2.3;7.2.2.3 Step 3: Sustainability and Vulnerability;166
9.5.2.2.4;7.2.2.4 Step 4: The Virtuous Cycle – Framework for City Development;169
9.5.2.2.5;7.2.2.5 Step 5: Setting Priorities;171
9.5.2.2.6;7.2.2.6 Step 6: Working with Partners, Building Capacity;172
9.5.3;7.3 Reflections on Building a New Practice Model;173
9.5.4;References;175
9.6;Chapter 8: Managing Urban Heterogeneity: A Budapest Case Study of Historical Urban Landscape;178
9.6.1;8.1 Introduction;179
9.6.2;8.2 Józsefváros, the Eighth District of Budapest;181
9.6.3;8.3 Applying the HUL Approach;184
9.6.4;8.4 Contemporary Urban and Architectural Interventions;186
9.6.4.1;8.4.1 Palace Quarter;186
9.6.4.2;8.4.2 The Magdolna Quarter;190
9.6.5;8.5 Conclusion;194
9.6.6;References;194
9.7;Chapter 9: Bukhara: A Living Central Asian Silk Roads City. Application of the Historic Urban Landscape Approach;196
9.7.1;9.1 Introduction;197
9.7.2;9.2 Bukhara as World Heritage;198
9.7.2.1;9.2.1 Current Issues and Challenges;198
9.7.3;9.3 The Historic Urban Landscape Process;200
9.7.3.1;9.3.1 HUL Applied in Bukhara;200
9.7.3.2;9.3.2 Development Defined;207
9.7.4;9.4 Economic Assessment;208
9.7.5;9.5 Conservation Approach;210
9.7.6;9.6 Conclusion;213
9.7.7;References;214
9.8;Chapter 10: City as Evolving Process: Case for the Historic Urban Landscape Approach for Canberra;216
9.8.1;10.1 Introduction;217
9.8.2;10.2 The Canberra Context;218
9.8.3;10.3 Governance;221
9.8.4;10.4 Why Canberra Needs and Deserves the HUL Approach;225
9.8.4.1;10.4.1 Manuka Oval, Griffith (Fig. 10.4 site A);225
9.8.4.2;10.4.2 City to the Lake (Fig. 10.4 site B);227
9.8.4.3;10.4.3 Northbourne Avenue Corridor (Fig. 10.4 site C);229
9.8.5;10.5 National Heritage Listing;229
9.8.6;10.6 The HUL Approach;231
9.8.7;10.7 Conclusion;233
9.8.8;References;234
9.9;Chapter 11: The HUL Approach to Create Heritage Management Tools in the Latin American City of Cuenca-Ecuador;236
9.9.1;11.1 Introduction;237
9.9.2;11.2 The HUL Approach in Practice;238
9.9.3;11.3 Learning and Reflections;242
9.9.4;11.4 Project Impact: Social, Governmental and Research Impact;246
9.9.5;11.5 Current State and Future Directions;248
9.9.6;References;250
9.10;Chapter 12: The Historic Urban Landscape Approach in Edinburgh’s Old and New Towns: Implementation of Projects on the Ground in a Living Capital City;252
9.10.1;12.1 Introduction;252
9.10.2;12.2 The Evolution of the Approach in Edinburgh;253
9.10.3;12.3 Edinburgh World Heritage’s Approach;254
9.10.4;12.4 The Conservation Funding Programme;255
9.10.5;12.5 World Heritage Projects Programme;256
9.10.6;12.6 Learning Programmes;257
9.10.7;12.7 Energy Efficiency;258
9.10.8;12.8 Future Directions;259
9.10.9;12.9 Further Strengths and Weaknesses;260
9.10.10;References;262
9.11;Chapter 13: Havana: From the Walled City to a Historic Urban Landscape;263
9.11.1;13.1 The City and Its History;263
9.11.2;13.2 The Beginning of the Project, 1981–1993;265
9.11.3;13.3 The New Management Model;266
9.11.3.1;13.3.1 1994–1999: Heritage: A Cultural Asset Turned into an Economic Resource;267
9.11.3.2;13.3.2 2000–2004: Focusing on Social Affairs;269
9.11.3.3;13.3.3 2005–2009: Reflecting on the Practice;270
9.11.3.4;13.3.4 2010–2014: New Instruments and Stakeholders;271
9.11.4;13.4 The New Scene;273
9.11.4.1;13.4.1 A New Vision for the Heritage Site;274
9.11.4.2;13.4.2 New Territory, New Urban Approach;276
9.11.5;13.5 Conclusion;277
9.11.6;References;277
9.12;Chapter 14: The Implementation of the Historic Urban Landscape of the Island of Mozambique;279
9.12.1;14.1 Introduction;280
9.12.2;14.2 Geographical, Historical, and Urban Setting;281
9.12.2.1;14.2.1 Geographical Setting;281
9.12.2.2;14.2.2 Archaeological and Historical Background;282
9.12.2.3;14.2.3 Urban Expansion;286
9.12.3;14.3 Island of Mozambique: World Heritage;286
9.12.3.1;14.3.1 The UNESCO Listing;286
9.12.3.2;14.3.2 Measures Following the Listing;287
9.12.3.3;14.3.3 The 2007 Action Plan;288
9.12.4;14.4 Historic Urban Landscape Approach;289
9.12.4.1;14.4.1 Application of HUL to the Island of Mozambique;289
9.12.4.2;14.4.2 A New Heritage Management Plan;289
9.12.4.3;14.4.3 Learning from the Application of the HUL;290
9.12.4.3.1;14.4.3.1 Lesson 1;290
9.12.4.3.2;14.4.3.2 Lesson 2;292
9.12.4.3.3;14.4.3.3 Lesson 3;293
9.12.5;14.5 Partnerships on Conservation;294
9.12.5.1;14.5.1 Public-Private Partnership;294
9.12.5.2;14.5.2 Coordination Between Local Stakeholders and UNESCO;294
9.12.5.3;14.5.3 Partnerships Between National and Foreign Institutions for Technical Assistance;295
9.12.5.4;14.5.4 The Role of the Private Sector;297
9.12.6;14.6 Concluding Remarks;300
9.12.7;References;301
9.12.7.1;Further Readings;303
9.13;Chapter 15: Urban Heritage Conservation and Management in Jaipur;305
9.13.1;15.1 Introduction;306
9.13.2;15.2 Historic and Geographic Context;306
9.13.3;15.3 Planning of the City;307
9.13.4;15.4 Walled City as a Living Heritage;312
9.13.5;15.5 Protection and Management Initiatives;314
9.13.5.1;15.5.1 Urban Renewal for Walled City of Jaipur (2009–2014);315
9.13.5.2;15.5.2 Revitalization of Heritage Walk;318
9.13.5.3;15.5.3 The Built Heritage Management Plan, Jaipur (2007);319
9.13.5.4;15.5.4 Jaipur Master Plan 2025;320
9.13.5.5;15.5.5 Architectural Control Guidelines for the Walled City;320
9.13.5.6;15.5.6 Jantar Mantar Management Plan (2010);320
9.13.5.7;15.5.7 Jaipur Smart City Plan 2016;321
9.13.6;15.6 Conclusion;322
9.13.7;Bibliography;323
9.14;Chapter 16: Roadmap for Implementation of the HUL Approach in Kuwait City;325
9.14.1;16.1 Introduction;325
9.14.2;16.2 Case Study Description;326
9.14.2.1;16.2.1 Layers of the City;326
9.14.2.2;16.2.2 Cultural Heritage;328
9.14.2.3;16.2.3 Management of Change;330
9.14.3;16.3 Challenges for the HUL Approach;332
9.14.3.1;16.3.1 Urban Planning;332
9.14.3.2;16.3.2 New Development;332
9.14.3.3;16.3.3 Unfamiliar Terminology;334
9.14.4;16.4 Opportunities for the HUL Approach;335
9.14.4.1;16.4.1 Compatible Contemporary Interventions;335
9.14.4.2;16.4.2 Theoretical Model and HUL Toolkit;335
9.14.4.3;16.4.3 Six-Step HUL Action Plan;336
9.14.5;16.5 Conclusion;338
9.14.6;References;338
9.14.6.1;Further Readings;340
9.15;Chapter 17: Case Study: Lamu Old Town;341
9.15.1;17.1 Introduction;342
9.15.1.1;17.1.1 Background;342
9.15.1.2;17.1.2 Conservation of the Town;343
9.15.1.3;17.1.3 Current Urban Functions and Problems Encountered in Implementing the Urban Scheme;343
9.15.2;17.2 Identifying Development Challenges in Lamu and Previous Intervention Strategies;346
9.15.2.1;17.2.1 Recommendations of the Intergovernmental Working Party;346
9.15.2.2;17.2.2 Lamu Workshop: Conservation of Historic Towns and Monuments;347
9.15.2.3;17.2.3 Previous Intervention Strategies;348
9.15.3;17.3 Lamu and the Historic Urban Landscape Approach;348
9.15.3.1;17.3.1 Post Lamu HUL Workshop: Mapping Exercise;350
9.15.4;17.4 Implications of HUL Application and Integrating the Approach;351
9.15.4.1;17.4.1 Integrating HUL into Planning and Development Processes of the Lamu County Spacial Plan;352
9.15.4.2;17.4.2 Upgrading of Social Infrastructure;353
9.15.5;17.5 Conclusion;353
9.15.6;References;355
9.16;Chapter 18: Conservation and Exploitation: Governance and Sustainability Issues: The Case of Lijiang;356
9.16.1;18.1 Introduction;356
9.16.2;18.2 Preservation vs Exploitation and the Issue of Governance;357
9.16.3;18.3 Lijiang Case (Or Cases);358
9.16.3.1;18.3.1 Conservation and Exploitation in Dayan;359
9.16.3.2;18.3.2 Outsourcing to a Private Developer: Conservation and Exploitation in Shuhe;363
9.16.4;18.4 Discussion;364
9.16.5;18.5 Concluding Remarks;365
9.16.6;References;366
9.17;Chapter 19: Managing the Global Heritage City of Mexico City: Adapting the HUL Approach to the Globalised Urban Context;368
9.17.1;19.1 Introduction: Global Heritage Cities;369
9.17.2;19.2 Mexico City in Context: Complexities, Framework and Governance;371
9.17.2.1;19.2.1 The Site;371
9.17.2.2;19.2.2 Planning and Legislative Frameworks;373
9.17.2.3;19.2.3 Governance and Decision-Making;373
9.17.3;19.3 Normative Tools for HUL Adaptation;377
9.17.3.1;19.3.1 The Integral Management Plan;377
9.17.3.2;19.3.2 The Partnership Models, Community Engagement and Consensus Building;378
9.17.4;19.4 Conclusion;380
9.17.5;References;382
9.18;Chapter 20: At the Confluence of Geography, Society and History: Montreal and the 2011 UNESCO Recommendation on Historic Urban Landscape;384
9.18.1;20.1 Introduction;385
9.18.2;20.2 The Case of Montreal;385
9.18.3;20.3 Some Pre-2011 HUL Occurrences in Montreal;386
9.18.4;20.4 1984: Protected Views or Cultural Landscape?;387
9.18.5;20.5 1992: The Plan d’urbanisme and the Form of the City;388
9.18.6;20.6 1995: Heritage and the Metropolitan Landscape;389
9.18.7;20.7 2006: Vienna Memorandum;389
9.18.8;20.8 Specific Mentions of the 2011 UNESCO Recommendations in Montreal;390
9.18.9;20.9 Mont Royal: La Montagne;390
9.18.10;20.10 Conclusion;391
9.18.11;Note on the 2011 UNESCO Recommendation and the 2017 situation in Montreal;392
9.19;Chapter 21: Urban Heritage Conservation in the Historic Site of Olinda, Brazil: 1968–2016;398
9.19.1;21.1 Introduction;399
9.19.2;21.2 The Occupation of the City and the Historic Site;400
9.19.3;21.3 The Conservation Planning and Management System;400
9.19.3.1;21.3.1 The Formation: 1968–1988;400
9.19.3.2;21.3.2 The Transition: 1989–1996;401
9.19.3.3;21.3.3 The Master Plans, Urban Development Projects, and the Incentive to Culture: 1997–2016;407
9.19.4;21.4 Conclusions;411
9.19.5;References;412
9.20;Chapter 22: Revitalizing Urban Parks to Uplift a Rust Belt City: HUL Applied to Pittsburgh, PA, USA;414
9.20.1;22.1 Introduction;415
9.20.1.1;22.1.1 HUL Urban Public Space Context;415
9.20.2;22.2 Pittsburgh and the Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy;416
9.20.3;22.3 PPC HUL Civic Engagement Application;418
9.20.4;22.4 PPC HUL Knowledge and Planning Application;420
9.20.5;22.5 PPC HUL Regulatory Systems Application;421
9.20.6;22.6 PPC HUL Financial Tools Application;423
9.20.7;22.7 PPC and Partners Applying HUL Tools Towards Urban Sustainability;425
9.20.8;References;427
9.21;Chapter 23: Perspectives for a Historic Urban Landscape Approach in Porto, Portugal;429
9.21.1;23.1 Introduction;429
9.21.2;23.2 The Case Study of Porto;431
9.21.2.1;23.2.1 Porto: A Metropolitan Area, a City and a WH Historic Centre;431
9.21.2.2;23.2.2 A Mosaic Management;433
9.21.3;23.3 Methodology;435
9.21.4;23.4 Perspectives on the Implementation of HUL Steps in Porto;436
9.21.4.1;23.4.1 Understanding the Context;436
9.21.4.1.1;23.4.1.1 Mapping Natural, Cultural and Human Resources;437
9.21.4.1.2;23.4.1.2 Reach Consensus on What to Protect: Values and Attributes;439
9.21.4.1.3;23.4.1.3 Assess Vulnerability to Change and Development;441
9.21.4.2;23.4.2 Integration in the Wider Urban Framework;443
9.21.4.3;23.4.3 Managing Action;444
9.21.5;23.5 Conclusion and Recommendations;445
9.21.6;References;446
9.22;Chapter 24: Rabat, Morocco: Sustaining the Historic Urban Landscape of Rabat: Strategies and Implementation;448
9.22.1;24.1 Introduction;449
9.22.2;24.2 A City–Landscape Evolution: Historical Background;450
9.22.2.1;24.2.1 Almohad Period: The Genesis of a Capital;450
9.22.2.2;24.2.2 Marinid Period: Fragmentation and the Rise of Salé;451
9.22.2.3;24.2.3 Saadian Dynasty: Bouregreg’s Republic and the Rise of Oudaya;451
9.22.2.4;24.2.4 Alaouite Dynasty: Unification and Harmonization of Landscape;452
9.22.3;24.3 Colonial Period: A Shift of Urban Heritage Paradigm;452
9.22.4;24.4 Contemporary Rabat: Current Sustainable Strategies;453
9.22.4.1;24.4.1 Territorial Level;454
9.22.4.2;24.4.2 Urban Level;454
9.22.4.3;24.4.3 Sustainability Implementation;455
9.22.5;24.5 Applying the 2011 UNESCO Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape;455
9.22.6;24.6 Conclusion;457
9.22.7;Bibliography;458
9.22.7.1;Further Reading;458
9.23;Chapter 25: Heritage-Based Urban Development: The Example of Regensburg;459
9.23.1;25.1 Introduction;460
9.23.2;25.2 Survey and Mapping;460
9.23.3;25.3 Actions and Priorities;464
9.23.3.1;25.3.1 Field of Action: Tangible Cultural Heritage;465
9.23.3.2;25.3.2 Field of Action: Economic Development;466
9.23.3.3;25.3.3 Field of Action: Awareness Raising and Research;468
9.23.4;25.4 Civic Engagement Tools;469
9.23.4.1;25.4.1 Civic Participation Model of Regensburg;469
9.23.4.2;25.4.2 Expert Consultancy;471
9.23.4.3;25.4.3 Participation Practices;472
9.23.4.3.1;25.4.3.1 Site Management Plan and Citizen Participation;472
9.23.4.3.2;25.4.3.2 Civic Participation Practice in Field: Renovation of the Central Pedestrian Zone;474
9.23.4.3.3;25.4.3.3 Specific Issue: Vulnerability Assessment;474
9.23.5;25.5 Networking;476
9.23.6;25.6 Conclusion;478
9.23.7;References;479
9.24;Chapter 26: Enhancing Rural-Urban Linkages Through the Historic Urban Landscape Approach: The Case of Shuang Wan Cun in the Jiangsu Province;482
9.24.1;26.1 Introduction;483
9.24.2;26.2 Suzhou and Its Region: Historical Overview;484
9.24.2.1;26.2.1 Industrial Innovation and Urban Conservation;485
9.24.2.2;26.2.2 Suzhou Peri-urbanity: Diversity and Dynamics;488
9.24.2.3;26.2.3 Peri-urbanity: Challenges and Opportunities;489
9.24.3;26.3 Report from Shuang Wan Cun Case Study;490
9.24.4;26.4 Discussion and Conclusion;493
9.24.5;References;494
9.25;Chapter 27: Actual and Intangible in Tel Aviv: A Reexamination of Conservation Strategies in a Modern City;496
9.25.1;27.1 Introduction;497
9.25.2;27.2 White City: A Modern City;497
9.25.3;27.3 The Dialects of Tangible and Intangible;498
9.25.4;27.4 The White City Center at Liebling House;500
9.25.4.1;27.4.1 Research;500
9.25.4.2;27.4.2 Culture;501
9.25.4.3;27.4.3 Education;502
9.25.4.4;27.4.4 Site Management;502
9.25.5;27.5 Case Studies;503
9.25.6;27.6 Summary and Conclusion;505
9.25.7;References;505
9.26;Chapter 28: The Circular Economy as a Model to Implement the Historic Urban Landscape Approach: Which Integrated Evaluation Method?;506
9.26.1;28.1 Introduction;507
9.26.2;28.2 The Heritage Impact Assessment to Evaluate the Torre Annunziata Waterfront Requalification Project;509
9.26.2.1;28.2.1 The Case Study;509
9.26.2.2;28.2.2 Heritage Impact Assessment and the Participative Method;517
9.26.3;28.3 The Circular Economy as a Tool to Implement the HUL Approach;523
9.26.3.1;28.3.1 A Circular Project for the Requalification of Torre Annunziata Waterfront;523
9.26.4;28.4 Conclusion and Recommendation;531
9.26.5;References;532
9.27;Chapter 29: Operationalizing the HUL Recommendation in Urban River Corridors: Challenges and Perspectives;534
9.27.1;29.1 Introduction;534
9.27.2;29.2 River Corridors as Historic Urban Landscapes;536
9.27.3;29.3 Methodology;537
9.27.4;29.4 Study Area;538
9.27.5;29.5 A Double-Lens Approach to HUL Documentation;539
9.27.5.1;29.5.1 A Combined Morphological/Ecological Approach;540
9.27.5.2;29.5.2 Cultural Values Associated with Urban River Corridors;541
9.27.6;29.6 Urban Heritage Policies and Management;542
9.27.7;29.7 A SWOT Analysis for HUL Operationalization;546
9.27.8;29.8 Conclusion;548
9.27.9;References;548
9.28;Chapter 30: Zanzibar: The HUL Approach Explored;551
9.28.1;30.1 The Islands of Zanzibar: Background;551
9.28.2;30.2 World Heritage and the Evolving Historic Urban Landscape Recommendation;555
9.28.3;30.3 The New Zanzibar Planning Process and the HUL Approach;556
9.28.4;30.4 Applying the Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape: Integrative Development Strategies;559
9.28.5;30.5 Lessons from Zanzibar and the Way Forward;562
9.28.6;References;565
10;Case Study Boxes: Full Text;566
10.1;1. Applying the Recommendations on Historic Urban Landscape: Post-conflict Reconciliation in Old Aleppo;566
10.2;2. Understanding to What Extent the HUL Approach Is Present in Amsterdam’s Local Urban and Heritage Policies;567
10.3;3. Overarching Urban Planning Guidelines for the Historic Perimeter of Asmara;567
10.4;4. Historic Urban Landscape: Ballarat;568
10.5;5. Centro Cultural Kirchner (CCK);568
10.6;6. Mapping the Historic Centre of Bukhara;569
10.7;7. HUL in Historic Cairo: A Potential Community Initiative;570
10.8;8. Reassessment of the Cultural and Natural Heritage of the City of Cuenca Based on Strategies for Sustainable Development Supported by the Recommendation on Historical Urban Landscape;570
10.9;9. Mapping Economic Landscape for the UNESCO World Heritage City Old Towns of Djenné;571
10.10;10. Sense of Place: Toward Integrated Conservation and Sustainable Urban;572
10.11;11. University of Pennsylvania Planning Praxis Course: How Do the HUL, Sustainable Development Goals, and New Urban Agenda Fit into a Local Planning Framework;572
10.12;12. Urban Rehabilitation of the Historic Centre of Havana, World Heritage Site;573
10.13;13. Living Human Treasures of Grand Bazaar: Istanbul Jewelry Making as an Intangible Urban Activity;573
10.14;14. Jaipur Built Heritage Management Plan and Urban Conservation Projects;574
10.15;15. The Revitalization of the Historic City of Jeddah;575
10.16;16. olomna: Cultural Memory as a Resource for Developing a Historic City;575
10.17;17. Possible Project: HUL+KMP4;576
10.18;18. Integrating HUL into the Conservation and Development Processes of the Lamu Old Town;576
10.19;19. Not a Formal Project on HUL: Simply Practices Associated with the Management of the UNESCO Site of Lijiang, China (Listed in 1997);577
10.20;20. Urban Heritage of the Mediterranean: Interdisciplinary Methodologies for the Characterization of the Infrastructural Axis of the Andalusian Littoral and Its Synergies with HUL Recommendations;577
10.21;21. Mexico City Historic Center Recovery and Rehabilitation Programs;578
10.22;22. Mudurnu Cultural Heritage Site Management Plan: Phase I;579
10.23;23. Adopting HUL Toolkits in Muharraq: The Bahrain Authority for Culture and Archeology (BACA);580
10.24;24. Preservation and Conservation of the Historic Site of Olinda;580
10.25;25. Porto Municipal Master Plan (PDM);581
10.26;26. Historic Preservation Toolkit;582
10.27;27. Preparatory Assistance and Technical Support for the Inscription, Conservation and Management of the Île De Saint-Louis, Senegal;582
10.28;28. Scenarios for Sustainable Rural Development in Shuang Wan Cun, Wujiang District, Suzhou;583
10.29;29. Reconstruction of World Heritage Mausoleums of Timbuktu;584
10.30;30. Pompeii Great Project: The Buffer Zone Regeneration;584
10.31;31. Technical Cooperation for the Enhancement, Development, and Protection of the Town of Luang Prabang, Lao People’s Democratic Republic;585
10.32;32. Project Proposal: The Revitalization of the Abu Ali River;587
11;Index;588