Pomper Obama Gang

How Barack Obama, through his post-presidency foundation, assembled, launched, and wages the new assault on American law enforcement
1. Auflage 2021
ISBN: 978-1-0983-5526-5
Verlag: BookBaby
Format: EPUB
Kopierschutz: Adobe DRM (»Systemvoraussetzungen)

E-Book, Englisch, 292 Seiten

New Investigative Book Exposes Former President's Foundation is at the Center of the Anti-Police Firestorm The wave of riots and anti-police actions that began in the Spring of 2020, and continue to this day, have been generally reported by the mainstream media as an entirely spontaneous grass roots response to the death in police custody of George Floyd in Minneapolis. The mainstream media got it wrong. National Police Association writer and retired Seattle police officer Steve Pomper's new book, The Obama Gang, provides for the first time an explanation that what happened was far from spontaneous. This investigation into what is really behind the new vilification of law enforcement exposes the groundwork for the anti-police firestorm was carefully created, organized and led by former president Barack Obama's Foundation, and executed by the Foundation's web of allies. The anti-police machine which has been constructed to operate across the country 24/7. The seemingly independent anti-police factions are in actuality part of a larger 'family' or 'gang' of wealthy and radical individuals and organizations. With former President Barack H. Obama's Foundation at the top, they operate similar to an organized crime family-on the periphery of civil society. From the bottom up, the organizational chart begins with the 'soldiers' on the streets, who caused such visible destruction during 2020, and climbs the crowded pyramid to the top. This 'family', or gang of individuals and organizations are now working together like never before to collapse policing in America as we know it-to collapse America as we know it.

Autoren/Hrsg.

Pomper, Steve

Leseproben

Chapter 1

The Anti-Police State

The nationwide onslaught against law and order and law enforcement is not the result of an organic popular uprising against corrupt and abusive American police forces. Each of the jurisdictions most hostile to the police did not just happen independently upon their organized, systemic hostility toward cops. The current offensive against the police is a part of a larger agenda perpetuated by an alliance of radical leftist groups to transform drastically what we have known as the United States of America. The major political parties are no longer flip sides of the same coin—the loyal opposition. They now seem more like two separate coins.

One major component of the anarchists’, socialists’, and Marxists’ plan to eradicate traditional America is to eliminate the cops first. Police officer boots on the ground are the mechanism by which civil society will defend itself and return to normal, and after which the insurrectionists can join other leftist radicals in well-deserved historical obscurity.

Ronald Reagan, in a speech3 to the British Parliament in 1982, put it best. “What I am describing now is a plan and a hope for the long term—the march of freedom and democracy which will leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash-heap of history as it has left other tyrannies which stifle the freedom and muzzle the self-expression of the people.” It is for no less than this ideal that people who want to keep the true American Revolution alive now strive. Today, Americans find their gun rights threatened by this same radical faction. They want to take away the people’s most effective means of self-defense (against them): firearms. Ironically, they’ve always said, “People should rely on the police.” What, then, should we conclude now that they want to get rid of both the police and your guns?

Where does that leave the individual American regarding his or her God-given right to self-defense? Not in a good place. However, a disarmed populace combined with a “re-imagined,” “re-envisioned,” or “re-combobulated” “police alternative” corps of “violence interrupters” loyal to the Left makes it much easier to rule over rather than serve under the people. To paraphrase Seinfeld’s Soup Nazi, “No more self-government for you!”

So, who is doing all this? Glad you asked. A lot of people—an awful lot of people.

The Obama Foundation sits atop an organizational, institutional, and political structure, with alliances both tacit and explicit, that operate much like a Mafia crime family—I was going to add, “without the violence,” but that would be inaccurate, wouldn’t it? After all, the Boss was encouraging the mayhem when he said, “I want you to argue with them and get in their faces.”4

Just ask the people who live in Portland. In late August 2020, a Joe Biden supporter, Michael Reinoehl, an Antifa member, allegedly shot and killed Donald Trump supporter5 and Patriot Prayer member Aaron “Jay” Danielson on the street. Reinoehl also supports Black Lives Matter (BLM), reportedly having a BLM neck tattoo. The killing was captured on video.6 A few days later, deputy U.S. marshals shot and killed7 the alleged murderer when Reinoehl reportedly drew a gun on federal cops, as the fugitive task force attempted to arrest him on a murder warrant.

Back to the issue at hand. Is it fair to compare the Boss’s anti-police movement to the mob? Here, it seems so. Anyone who seeks to “reform,” defund, or abolish law enforcement, especially in a systematic and even violent way, is engaging in organized crime against civil society. In other words, the anti-cop political leaders have put a contract out on traditional America, and they’re trying to have law enforcement whacked!

When you have several like-minded, loosely affiliated people heading in the same political direction, that’s one thing. But when you have an official 501c3 nonprofit organization (Obama.org), complete with loyal captains, obedient soldiers, and useful associates, that’s another thing entirely.

There are people engaged in an organized effort to manipulate the national discourse and public policy by getting politicians to swear a loyalty pledge, known as “omerta.”8 This promise commits them to destroying traditional American institutions, especially the police. How do we know the Boss is anti-police? Well, we can look at what he’s said and done to weaken law enforcement, law and order, and equal justice in America.

First, there is what the Boss said and did, pertaining to police officers, while in office, and what he’s been involved in since leaving the presidency. We’ll begin with an off-the-cuff remark the Boss made regarding a police incident about which he admitted he did not have all the facts. He said, “The Cambridge police acted stupidly….” Shouldn’t a president of the United States give the police the benefit of the doubt—at least initially? That seems fair, right? But he chose not to do that. Instead, he chose immediately to disparage the police, thus inciting an anti-police sentiment in America that would grow and eventually rage out of control.

This single incident has been chosen for chapter 2 to start this examination of the Obama Foundation’s anti-cop agenda because it happened in 2009, only six months into the Boss’s first term. It serves as a bit of table-setting for the president’s obvious hostility toward law enforcement.

During his presidency, he would insult law enforcement in many head-on and oblique ways, including by refusing to light9 the White House in blue to honor fallen police officers. He had previously lit the White House in rainbow colors10 to celebrate the Supreme Court decision favoring same-sex marriage. It would not have been a difficult gesture. Why such reluctance? On the other hand, President Donald Trump has bathed America’s house in blue11 repeatedly.

Despite what the Boss and his defenders have said to the contrary, Obama’s presidency was filled with, at best, apathy, and at worst, antipathy for cops. His singular pogrom against law enforcement demonstrated this when he, along with his “wingman”12 Eric Holder as attorney general, weaponized the Department of Justice (DOJ). With that, they launched attacks against several American police departments and inflicted on them bogus consent decrees.13

Incidentally, the Boss’s close association with Holder makes it appropriate to give the wingman a new title: Consigliere. Of course, Valerie Jarrett comes to mind as a more literal consigliere—advisor to the Boss. But for these purposes the term is being applied more as an allusion than literally. Holder and the Boss’s relationship seemed more public, with Jarrett’s and the Boss’s seeming more private. Besides, it’s just a device to advance the allegory, so fuhgeddaboudit.

As mentioned in my book De-Policing America:14 A Street Cop’s View of the Anti-Police State (Post Hill Press, 2018), “According to Newsmax.com’s Sean Piccoll, former U.S. attorney Andrew C. McCarthy, who prosecuted the criminals of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, says, ‘They’ve [DOJ] had their thumbs on the scales from the beginning.’ Piccoll continues, ‘McCarthy cited a string of federal civil-rights investigations into some 20 police departments, including Ferguson, Missouri’s, which he said the Justice Department has approached with a presumption of racial guilt.’”

McCarthy was right and still is. Exploiting high-profile use-of-force incidents, in which most officers have been cleared, the Boss/Consigliere DOJ inflicted protocols on the police that, pardon the pun, has handcuffed them. The Boss/Consigliere DOJ never met a police department it didn’t think was “systemically” abusive and corrupt.

This attitude is at the heart of the Boss’s antagonism toward law enforcement, which, as we will discover, did not end with his presidency. In July 2020, the Boss delivered a eulogy15 at the funeral for civil rights icon John Lewis, a Georgia representative from 1987 till his death. As occurred with former President Bill Clinton before him during Minnesota Senator Paul Wellstone’s funeral16 in 2002, in 2020 the Boss hijacked the Lewis funeral to deliver a painfully partisan and inappropriately political speech. But because it was the Boss and he was enmeshed among his adoring sycophants, he got away with it—as usual.

Only by ignoring the obvious video and eyewitness evidence can anyone buy into what people like Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) have called a myth17 (note: YouTube has taken down this video), referring to reports of violence occurring during Antifa riots. They are no myth. Ask the myriad cops who have been assaulted. Or, better yet, Nadler should ask fellow Democrat Keith Ellison. Ellison is a former deputy chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) who resigned over sexual assault allegations.18

By the way, Ellison’s anti-police qualifications are well established. About sexual assault investigations, Ellison said, cops “shouldn’t respond to ‘sexual assault’ calls if the assailant ran away.’” Sean Hannity of Fox News...