Purism | E-Book | www.sack.de
E-Book

E-Book, Englisch, 164 Seiten

Purism

Peace Through Purity
1. Auflage 2015
ISBN: 978-1-4835-5401-3
Verlag: BookBaby
Format: EPUB
Kopierschutz: Adobe DRM (»Systemvoraussetzungen)

Peace Through Purity

E-Book, Englisch, 164 Seiten

ISBN: 978-1-4835-5401-3
Verlag: BookBaby
Format: EPUB
Kopierschutz: Adobe DRM (»Systemvoraussetzungen)



Purism is a complete ideology for the pursuit of apolitical-endo-governance: governance without opinion and which occurs imperceptibly and automatically as a material function/process of the material within/surrounding all Beings. Such governance is distinguished from contemporary political (exo-)governments, which advocate and rely on Beings externally, consciously and conscientiously attempting to govern themselves using methods and purposes of opinion. Purism states that the derivative of all 'problems' and immorality within complex existence - within, between, and as conceived by, contemporary Beings - is due to the impurity [inconsistency] of the materials and their sub-materials from which contemporary Beings are constructed (and rely upon for their continued existence). Specifically, concepts such as 'war', 'disease', 'crime', 'famine' are symptoms of the same disorder which arises from material and it's various forms being expected or forced to perform tasks that it was not purposely designed for. Purism details a logically derived solution to material impurity. In such course, Primus derives proof of the impossibility, that is, the logical incompatibility, of an absolute God and details an objective, that is, a logically derived, Morality. The ultimate product and, thus, pursuit of the Morality of Purism is everlasting and universal Peace.

Purism jetzt bestellen!

Autoren/Hrsg.


Weitere Infos & Material


The Law of (Absolute) urity
“difference is (Certainly) Impossible at any point of (The) urity (that Is ((forever) through(out and within) All)), yet difference(, in All it’s apparency,) (certainly) exists”
The Law [(unchanging) statement of {regarding} material nature {intrinsicness}] of (The) (Absolute) urity {aterial} (underpinning All entities)
The Law of (Absolute) urity can be elaborated as:
(perception is (y/)our certainty
{((uncapitalised<_ ‘c’ indicates:)‘, although) limited in |space and time|,’}
that) difference {existence; other than a singular {continuous} entity; (structural-)resolution; impurity {inconsistency; immorality; variation, limitation} (– where and while it exists within material), (amorality – where and while It exists as) Form(, as served by a (relativly) consistent {Pure} material)} exists (across (the plane(/s) of apparency {|quant(/qual/)|ification(s)}, and thus across) Space {urity} and(, at points of) time(, where, and while, time exists),) (and is thus forever Possible,) (although not necessarily (possible)
(– the capitalisation_,_> of |‘Possible’/‘Impossibility’| indicates (/entity within) condition {’event ‘} is respectivly |able/not able| to eventuate Ever(, as determined by The Law of (Absolute) urity); uncapitalisation of |‘possible’/ ‘impossible’| indicates entity or event is both within the realm of Possibility (given any time of any space) |and able/but not able| to eventuate, respectivly, within immediate, contemporary condition(s)( – such<_ is thus respectivly |‘impossible’/ ‘possible’| (in (/a/) different (set of/) condition(\s/)) {– at another (point in) time, across other (points in) Space}
–)
forevermore), yet(, the basis {foundation} of (All) logic [the basis of (All) material [the basis of (All) Form]] Is The
{(capitalisation (within Purism, in general,) indicates:) ‘singular’ or ‘unique’ with respect to meaning or occurrence
(– in these<_;_,_>> instances, it specifically indicates: ‘foreverandonly {singular and eternal}(across All |space and (where, and while,) time (exists)|
{<_Space and time
(– as a reminder of its fragility, {non-intrinsicness} and that All initiation {time} materials(, even ?dvancing, Ascended cells,) occurs at differing rates {velocities} across space, ‘time’ should not be capitalised {singl(is)ed} when used to express All (/concurrent) initiation; there will be Official (attempts to create a) Time(, as measured by cyclical initiation of a structure used as standard), yet the consistency of such will forever be compromised {interfered with} (by distal initiation)
–)
}
)
–)
}
Certainty that difference) is Impossible [can(/not) (n\)ever exist] at any point of (The) urity
{
(The only entity classifiable as (true) indifference {non-existence}, as defined by It’s)
absolute Purity
(– accent {} indicates state of (upper-)absoluteness (of (the (non-categorical) dimension of) ‘Purity’)
(–
capitalisation of ‘Purity’ indicates that it is a Purism-specific term(inology) (of non-(con)temporary meaning)
)
)
; (constitutional {intrinsic}) onsistency (of absolute (and equal) degrees of (the dimensions of) |righteousness {logic} and responsibility {rationality}|) (of material) across |Space and (All) time(s)|
; The condition(s)
; Space
; aterial( – capitalisations<_,_,_ indicate): singular {omnipresent} entity, |accessed/utilised| (as material) by All existence(; accent<_ {} indicates irreducible)
; ‘That’ (definitionally {conceptually}) known as ‘Truth {Certainty}’ and ‘That’ ‘Truth’ as (empirically) Known’, from which all (con)temporary
{(uncapitalised, indicating:) limited in |space and time|}
(descendant) versions (of ‘truth’ and ‘that’ {<_probabilities (of certainty)}) are derived
; orality
(– capitalisation<_ indicates |singular, objectiv {derived from logic, not opinion}| version(, distinct from the multiple versions of ’moralities‘(, created by impurists {relativists} who (incorrectly) believe that all ‘moralities’ are relativ-concepts(, and that a(n objectiv) Morality is not Possible))); accent {} indicates state of (upper-) absoluteness {the pinnacle} of (the (non-categorical) dimension of) (objectiv) Morality
)
}
(–
when communicating The Law of (Absolute) urity to those unaware(, firstly,) that urity (intrinsically) Is(, and secondly, that it Is) everywhere and through(out and within) All
(–
even anarchy {chaos; disorder; descension; impurity} cannot rid it’s (requirement for) order {Purity} (and thus, Anarchy {absolute anarchy} is Impossible(, and anarchy(, as (/part of) an ideology,) is an inconsistency {illogicality; impurity; immorality} (within material)))
–)
(–
‘Is’ {intrinsic; unconditional; (being) forever} ? ‘(ex/)is(ts/)’ {inherited; conditional; being}
–)
, the term ‘urity’ |should/can| be substituted with the termspace’ for wider contemporary understanding. In this<_,_ instance, such<_ term can be (either) (/un)capitalised (and...



Ihre Fragen, Wünsche oder Anmerkungen
Vorname*
Nachname*
Ihre E-Mail-Adresse*
Kundennr.
Ihre Nachricht*
Lediglich mit * gekennzeichnete Felder sind Pflichtfelder.
Wenn Sie die im Kontaktformular eingegebenen Daten durch Klick auf den nachfolgenden Button übersenden, erklären Sie sich damit einverstanden, dass wir Ihr Angaben für die Beantwortung Ihrer Anfrage verwenden. Selbstverständlich werden Ihre Daten vertraulich behandelt und nicht an Dritte weitergegeben. Sie können der Verwendung Ihrer Daten jederzeit widersprechen. Das Datenhandling bei Sack Fachmedien erklären wir Ihnen in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.