E-Book, Englisch, 217 Seiten
Du / Ensan Canadian Semantic Web
1. Auflage 2010
ISBN: 978-1-4419-7335-1
Verlag: Springer
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: 1 - PDF Watermark
Technologies and Applications
E-Book, Englisch, 217 Seiten
ISBN: 978-1-4419-7335-1
Verlag: Springer
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: 1 - PDF Watermark
Autoren/Hrsg.
Weitere Infos & Material
1;Preface;6
2;Program Committee;10
3;Contents;12
4;Chapter 1 Incremental Query Rewriting with Resolution;18
4.1;1.1 Introduction.;18
4.1.1;1.1.1 Settings and motivation.;18
4.1.2;1.1.2 Outline of the proposed method.;21
4.2;1.2 Informal method description.;22
4.3;1.3 Soundness and completeness of schematic answer computation.;27
4.4;1.4 Recording literals as search space pruning constraints.;31
4.5;1.5 SQL generation.;33
4.6;1.6 Implementation and experiments.;34
4.7;1.7 A note on indexing SemanticWeb documents with data abstractions.;37
4.8;1.8 Related work.;38
4.9;1.9 Summary and future work.;40
4.10;References;42
5;Chapter 2 Knowledge Representation and Reasoning in Norm-Parameterized Fuzzy Description Logics;44
5.1;2.1 Introduction;44
5.2;2.2 Preliminaries;48
5.3;2.3 Fuzzy Set Theory and Fuzzy Logic;49
5.4;2.4 Fuzzy Description Logic;51
5.4.1;2.4.1 Syntax of fALCN;52
5.4.2;2.4.2 Semantics of fALCN;52
5.4.3;2.4.3 Knowledge Bases in fALCN;55
5.5;2.5 Reasoning Tasks;56
5.6;2.6 GCI, NNF, and ABox Augmentation;58
5.7;2.7 Reasoning Procedure;60
5.8;2.8 Soundness, Completeness, and Termination of the Reasoning Procedure for fALCN;62
5.9;2.9 Conclusion and FutureWork;68
5.10;References;69
6;Chapter 3 A Generic Evaluation Model for Semantic Web Services;71
6.1;3.1 Introduction;71
6.2;3.2 Performance Engineering for Component- and Service-oriented Systems;73
6.3;3.3 Requirements for a Generic Evaluation Model;74
6.3.1;3.3.1 Openness;74
6.3.2;3.3.2 Tool Independent;75
6.3.3;3.3.3 Conciseness;75
6.3.4;3.3.4 Preciseness;75
6.3.5;3.3.5 Completeness;75
6.3.6;3.3.6 Based on Classical Problems;76
6.3.7;3.3.7 Different Complexity Levels;76
6.3.8;3.3.8 Common Benchmarking;76
6.3.9;3.3.9 Flexibility to Perform Remote Evaluation;77
6.4;3.4 A Generic Evaluation Model for SemanticWeb Services;77
6.4.1;3.4.1 Semantic Web Services Execution Lifecycle;78
6.4.1.1;3.4.1.1 Service Discovery - S1;78
6.4.1.2;3.4.1.2 Service Selection - S2;78
6.4.1.3;3.4.1.3 Service Composition - S3;78
6.4.1.4;3.4.1.4 Service Mediation - S4;78
6.4.1.5;3.4.1.5 Service Choreography and Orchestration - S5;79
6.4.1.6;3.4.1.6 Service Invocation - S6;79
6.4.1.7;3.4.1.7 External Communication - S7;79
6.4.1.8;3.4.1.8 Internal Execution Management Time - EM;79
6.4.1.9;3.4.1.9 Overall Execution Time - T;80
6.4.2;3.4.2 Critical Evaluation Factors;80
6.4.2.1;3.4.2.1 Response Time - C1;80
6.4.2.2;3.4.2.2 Resource Consumption - C2;80
6.4.2.3;3.4.2.3 Resource Availability - C3;81
6.4.2.4;3.4.2.4 Service Availability - C4;81
6.4.2.5;3.4.2.5 Meaningfulness of Results - C5;81
6.4.2.6;3.4.2.6 Correctness of Results - C6;81
6.4.2.7;3.4.2.7 Completeness of Results - C7;82
6.4.2.8;3.4.2.8 Consistency of Results - C8;82
6.4.2.9;3.4.2.9 Degree of Decoupling - C9;82
6.5;3.5 Using the Evaluation Model for Semantic Web Services based on TSC;85
6.5.1;3.5.1 Comparing Resource Availability;85
6.5.2;3.5.2 Analyzing Performance on Concurrent Execution of Goals;86
6.5.3;3.5.3 Comparing Communication Overhead;86
6.5.4;3.5.4 Communication Overhead vs. Time Saved in Multiple Goal Execution;86
6.5.5;3.5.5 Comparing Time Taken in Distributed Service Execution;87
6.5.6;3.5.6 Comparing Time Saved by Applications while Executing aGoal;87
6.5.7;3.5.7 Comparing Time Saved in Resource Retrieval by WSMX;88
6.6;3.6 RelatedWork;88
6.6.1;3.6.1 Semantic Web Challenge;88
6.6.2;3.6.2 Semantic Web Services Challenge;89
6.6.3;3.6.3 Semantic Service Selection (S3);89
6.6.4;3.6.4 IEEE Web Services Challenge;89
6.6.5;3.6.5 SEALS Evaluation Campaigns;90
6.6.6;3.6.6 STI International Test Beds and Challenges Service;90
6.6.7;3.6.7 International Rules Challenge at RuleML;91
6.7;3.7 Conclusions and FutureWork;91
6.8;Acknowledgments.;92
6.9;References;92
7;Chapter 4 A Modular Approach to Scalable Ontology Development;94
7.1;4.1 Introduction;94
7.2;4.2 Interface-Based Modular Ontologies;97
7.2.1;4.2.1 The Formalism;97
7.2.2;4.2.2 IBF: Scalability and Reasoning Performance;98
7.3;4.3 OWL Extension and Tool Support for the Interface-Based Modular Ontology Formalism;98
7.4;4.4 Evaluating IBF Modular Ontologies;104
7.4.1;4.4.1 cohesion;104
7.4.2;4.4.2 coupling;106
7.4.3;4.4.3 Knowledge Encapsulation;109
7.5;4.5 Case Studies;109
7.5.1;4.5.1 IBF Modular Ontologies;110
7.5.2;4.5.2 IBF Ontologies Analysis;112
7.6;4.6 Related Work;114
7.7;4.7 Conclusion;115
7.7.1;References;116
7.8;4.8 Appendix;118
8;Chapter 5 Corporate SemanticWeb: Towards the Deployment of Semantic Technologies in Enterprises;119
8.1;5.1 Introduction;119
8.2;5.2 Application Domains for a Corporate SemanticWeb;120
8.3;5.3 Gaps;122
8.4;5.4 Corporate SemanticWeb;123
8.5;5.5 Corporate Ontology Engineering;125
8.5.1;5.5.1 Modularization and Integration Dimensions of COLM;126
8.5.1.1;5.5.1.1 Technical Concept;127
8.5.2;5.5.2 Versioning Dimensions of COLM;128
8.5.2.1;5.5.2.1 Design of the SVoNt Version Control System for OWL Ontologies;129
8.6;5.6 Corporate Semantic Collaboration;130
8.6.1;5.6.1 Editor Functionalities;131
8.6.2;5.6.2 User Groups;132
8.6.3;5.6.3 Design of the Light-weight Ontology Editor;133
8.7;5.7 Corporate Semantic Search;135
8.7.1;5.7.1 Search in Non-Semantic Data;136
8.7.1.1;5.7.1.1 Collecting Knowledge with Extreme Tagging Approach;136
8.7.1.2;5.7.1.2 Preprocessing Texts by Parsing and Chunking;138
8.7.2;5.7.2 Semantic Search Personalization;139
8.7.2.1;5.7.2.1 Semantic Matchmaking Framework;140
8.8;5.8 Conclusion and Outlook;144
8.9;References;144
9;Chapter 6 Semantic Service Matchmaking in the ATM Domain Considering Infrastructure Capability Constraints;146
9.1;6.1 Introduction;146
9.2;6.2 RelatedWork;149
9.2.1;6.2.1 Technical Integration;149
9.2.2;6.2.2 Semantic Integration with Semantic Web Services;151
9.2.3;6.2.3 Service Matchmaking Approaches;155
9.3;6.3 Research Issues;156
9.4;6.4 ATM Scenario Description;157
9.5;6.5 Semantic Service Matchmaking Approach;160
9.5.1;6.5.1 Identification of Possible Collaboration Candidate Sets;160
9.5.2;6.5.2 Validity-Check and Optimization of Collaborations;162
9.6;6.6 Case Study;163
9.6.1;6.6.1 Discussion;164
9.7;6.7 Conclusion;166
9.8;References;168
10;Chapter 7 Developing Knowledge Representation in Emergency Medical Assistance by Using Semantic Web Techniques;171
10.1;7.1 Introduction;171
10.2;7.2 Ontology and Mobile Devices Background;172
10.3;7.3 Proposed Approach;174
10.3.1;7.3.1 Ontology Development;175
10.3.1.1;7.3.1.1 Ontology Modeling;176
10.3.2;7.3.2 Determining the Ontology Domain;176
10.3.3;7.3.3 Enumerating Important Terms, Classes and the Class Hierarchy;177
10.3.4;7.3.4 Defining Properties and Restrictions of Classes;178
10.3.5;7.3.5 Creating Instances and New Terms Extraction;178
10.3.5.1;7.3.5.1 New Terms Instantiation;180
10.3.5.2;7.3.6 Semantic Cache;182
10.4;7.4 Experimental Environment and Results;183
10.5;7.5 Conclusions and FutureWork;183
10.6;References;185
11;Chapter 8 Semantically Enriching the Search System of a Music Digital Library;187
11.1;8.1 Introduction;187
11.2;8.2 Research Context;189
11.2.1;8.2.1 Previous Work;189
11.2.2;8.2.2 Cantiga Project;189
11.3;8.3 MagisterMusicae Search System;190
11.4;8.4 Improving Searchability;191
11.4.1;8.4.1 Applying Semantic Web Technologies;191
11.4.1.1;8.4.1.1 The Domain Ontology;192
11.4.1.2;8.4.1.2 The Instrument Taxonomy;193
11.4.1.3;8.4.1.3 The Resources Ontology;195
11.4.1.4;8.4.1.4 The Concept Taxonomy;195
11.4.2;8.4.2 Linking the Ontology with External Data Sources;197
11.4.2.1;8.4.2.1 Geographical Enrichment;198
11.4.2.2;8.4.2.2 Lexical Enrichment;198
11.4.3;8.4.3 Alternative Search Paradigms;199
11.5;8.5 Cantiga Semantic Search System;200
11.5.1;8.5.1 Details on the implementation;201
11.6;8.6 Evaluation;202
11.7;8.7 RelatedWork;204
11.8;8.8 Conclusions and FutureWork;205
11.9;Acknowledgments;205
11.10;References;205
12;Chapter 9 Application of an Intelligent System Frameworkand the SemanticWeb for the CO2 Capture Process;207
12.1;9.1 Introduction;207
12.2;9.2 Backgroundt;208
12.2.1;9.2.1 Application Problem Domain;208
12.2.2;9.2.2 Ontology and Semantic Web;208
12.3;9.3 Knowledge Modeling and Ontology Construction;209
12.3.1;9.3.1 Ontology Design;209
12.3.2;9.3.2 Ontology Management;211
12.4;9.4 Intelligent System Framework;212
12.5;9.5 Application of the Semantic Knowledge AWeb-based Expert System;214
12.6;9.6 Conclusion and FutureWork;215
12.7;Acknowledgments;217
12.8;References;217
13;Chapter 10 Information Pre-Processing using Domain Meta-Ontology and Rule Learning System;218
13.1;10.1 Introduction;219
13.2;10.2 The domain meta-ontology;221
13.3;10.3 The system for semi-automatic population of domain meta-ontology;224
13.4;10.4 Details of the Rule Learning System flow;225
13.5;References;227




