Buch, Englisch, 89 Seiten, Paperback, Format (B × H): 155 mm x 235 mm, Gewicht: 166 g
Reihe: SpringerBriefs in Ethics
Buch, Englisch, 89 Seiten, Paperback, Format (B × H): 155 mm x 235 mm, Gewicht: 166 g
Reihe: SpringerBriefs in Ethics
ISBN: 978-3-030-16736-3
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
After examining the Anglo-American criminal legal system’s treatment of responsibility as intentional agency, she critiques Hans Jonas’s concept of responsibility as ontological care and Hannah Arendt’s notion of communicative responsibility. She provides a careful analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach to responsibility. The final chapter makes the case for Socratic dialogical responsibility. Dialogical responsibility hasmany strengths in its own right and avoids the major pitfalls of the other notions of responsibility examined in the book. It serves as an eminently practical way to hold ourselves responsible for our actions and speech. In addition, dialogical responsibility alone qualifies as a virtue integral to the good life.
Zielgruppe
Research
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften Betriebswirtschaft Unternehmensorganisation, Corporate Responsibility Unternehmensethik
- Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Angewandte Ethik & Soziale Verantwortung Wirtschaftsethik, Unternehmensethik
- Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Geschichte der Westlichen Philosophie
- Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Ethik, Moralphilosophie
Weitere Infos & Material
Chapter 1. Why We Need a New (Old) Idea of Responsibility.- Chapter 2. Intentional Agency Responsibility in the Anglo-American Legal Tradition.- Chapter 3. Jonasian Ontological Responsibility.- Chapter 4. Arendtian Communicative Responsibility.- Chapter 5. Socratic Dialogical Responsibility.- Chapter 6. Conclusion.