1.1. Sediments and life on Mars at Gale crater
The Mars Science Lab Curiosity landed at Gale crater on August 6, 2012. The Gale crater landing site (
Figure 1.1) was chosen because it appeared to offer a wide range of past aqueous and thus, potentially habitable environments, indicated by features such as outflow channels, an alluvial fan, as well as sequences of finely bedded deposits exposed in its center containing strata with phyllosilicates and sulfates (
Figure 1.2).
Fig. 1.1 Gale crater from orbit with landing ellipse for the Mars Science Lab Curiosity. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS PIA 14290.
Fig. 1.2 Map of the relevant features for studying habitability in Gale crater. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS PIA 14305. Sources: Reproduced with permission from Milliken et al. (2010) and Anderson and Bell (2010). The landing site did not disappoint those who had selected it: more or less right from the point of touchdown, many features associated with deposition by water were encountered and sparked a flurry of data revealing the history and life-bearing potential of the analyzed sites (
Figure 1.3). Right near the site where Curiosity touched down, called the
Bradbury Landing, layers of sedimentary rocks were discovered on the first Martian day (sol) after landing. In the outcrop named
Goulburn, a well-sorted gravel conglomerate was exposed by the blast of the descent engine (
Figure 1.4). Conglomerates are rocks consisting of a matrix of sand and embedded well-rounded pebbles. The pebbles at
Goulburn were several centimeters in diameter and showed signs of orientation along the longitudinal axis. This type of deposition is indicative of sediment deposition from a flowing stream of water slowing down rapidly, possibly when leaving the confines of a channel. Further, similar outcrops were identified and analyzed by Curiosity during the first few weeks of the mission, which confirmed that the rover had landed on the remnants of an alluvial fan that had formed by erosion from the walls and deposition at their foot slopes in Gale crater. Based on the size of the pebbles embedded in the conglomerates and the slope of the alluvial fan, the flow velocity and depth of runoff from the crater wall could be estimated at 3–90 cm deep and flowing at a velocity of 2–75 cm/s.
Fig. 1.3 Curiosity on Mars, combined from images taken on sol 177 (February 3, 2013) and 270 of the mission. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS PIA 16937.
Fig. 1.4 Goulburn Scour, a conglomerate consisting of sand and pebbles blasted free by the engines during Curiosity’s descent. The inset is magnified by a factor of two. The image was obtained by the Mast Camera (Mastcam) on August 19, 2012 (=sol 13, i.e., the 13th Martian day since Curiosity’s landing). Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS PIA 16187.
The onward journey of Curiosity led to an area called
Yellowknife Bay (
Figure 1.5) with further sediments deposited by water (
Figure 1.6). Here, three clearly different layers of sedimentary rock, called
Sheepbed, Gillespie Lake, and
Glenelg, were discovered. All three show clear evidence of being deposited by water, but differ in texture and structure.
Sheepbed is a fine-grained mudstone consisting of particles smaller than 62.5 µm while
Gillespie Lake and
Glenelg are sandstones.
Glenelg is also visibly cross-stratified, which is indicative of deposition from shallow-flowing water. The chemical composition of
Sheepbed and
Gillespie is similar to common Martian upper crust basalts, while
Glenelg, on the other hand, is more alkaline. The chemical composition of all sediments indicates limited chemical weathering and thus, only a short exposure to a wet environment.
Fig. 1.5 Route of Curiosity during the first 130 days of surface operations. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS PIA 16554b.
Fig. 1.6 Shaler outcrop in Yellowknife Bay recorded by the Mastcam on the 120th sol, December 7, 2012 on Earth, after landing Curiosity on Mars. The outcrop’s patterned layers, called crossbedding, illustrate deposition by water. The rocks are part of the Glenelg formation. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS PIA 16550.
With regards to Curiosity’s mission objectives, the Sheepbed sediments were most exciting because there is a strong evidence that they formed in a lacustrine, i.e., shoreline-type of environment that would offer habitability for microorganisms. This conclusion is based on a number of properties that can be used as proxies for the environmental conditions at the time of their formation. Sediment of a grain size similar to Sheepbed is abundant on Mars and mostly moved by wind. However, some features point toward a wet deposition of Sheepbed. The chemically relatively uniform layer of mudstone has a thickness of approximately 2 m. While the deposition of such a thick layer of dust is theoretically possible, it is unlikely to occur in a landscape that is shaped by fluvial processes at the same time. Dust deposition rates are low on Mars and it would take 10–20 million years to form such a thick layer of dust. Accumulation of a fine lake sediment layer of similar thickness, on the other hand, requires between 100s and 1000s of years. It is also very unlikely that such a thick dust layer has a chemical and mineralogical composition as uniform as the one observed in Sheepbed because its origin would most likely vary with the source, i.e., volcanic eruptions, each with a distinct chemistry. Further analysis of the Sheepbed sediments revealed that the sedimentary environment would have been habitable for chemolithotrophic microorganisms. The most important indicators for such habitability are the presence of hydrogen sulfides, which serve as an energy source and a pH in a near-neutral range. Furthermore, essential elements for life such as carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus were detected in a form that would enable their use by microorganisms. Overall, the lake in which the Sheepbed sediments formed can therefore be considered as habitable for the type of microorganisms one would expect to have evolved on Mars. However, organic substances, such as methane, which are produced by living organisms, have only been found in traces lower than expected if life had been present. This leaves the Curiosity mission somewhere between a grand success because the potential habitability of Mars has been demonstrated, but the implicit hope of finding traces of life (although this was clearly not the scientific aim of the mission), has been disappointed.
The major lesson learned so far is that Mars is clearly more complex than expected. John P. Grotzinger, the lead scientist for the Curiosity Mission, summarized the findings by writing that “In this manner, the MSL mission has evolved from initially seeking to understand the habitability of ancient Mars to developing predictive models for the taphonomy of Martian organic matter”.
1 Learning more about how to find these fossils is one goal the experiments described in this...