Buch, Englisch, 220 Seiten, Format (B × H): 156 mm x 234 mm
Concepts of Conflict, Persons and Property
Buch, Englisch, 220 Seiten, Format (B × H): 156 mm x 234 mm
Reihe: Biomedical Law and Ethics Library
ISBN: 978-0-415-55559-3
Verlag: Taylor & Francis Ltd
The book begins by questioning the ‘conflict model’ which is often assumed to capture the essence of legal debates on maternal/foetal issues, and goes on to critically examine the concept of personhood in maternal/foetal debates, focusing in particular on human dignity and vulnerability. Finally, the discussion turns to examine the concept of property. Neal takes pregnancy as the inspiration for a reimagining of ‘property’ as paradigmatically intersubjective, arguing that property should be theorized in a way that foregrounds its essentially inclusive nature, and understands more traditional ideas of exclusion and control as effects of property, rather than as its defining characteristics.
This book will be of great interest to academics and students of medical law, family and child welfare law, and jurisprudence.
Zielgruppe
Postgraduate and Professional
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
- Rechtswissenschaften Recht, Rechtswissenschaft Allgemein Rechtstheorie, Rechtsmethodik, Rechtsdogmatik, Rechtsprechungslehre
- Rechtswissenschaften Recht, Rechtswissenschaft Allgemein Rechtsphilosophie, Rechtsethik
- Medizin | Veterinärmedizin Medizin | Public Health | Pharmazie | Zahnmedizin Medizin, Gesundheitswesen Medizinische Ethik
- Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Rechtsphilosophie, Rechtsethik
- Medizin | Veterinärmedizin Medizin | Public Health | Pharmazie | Zahnmedizin Medizin, Gesundheitswesen Medizinrecht, Gesundheitsrecht
- Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Angewandte Ethik & Soziale Verantwortung Medizinische Ethik
Weitere Infos & Material
Part 1: Conflict 1. Where is the Conflict? 2. Why is Conflict of Interest? Part 2: Personhood 3. Personhood in the Maternal/Foetal Context 4. Personhood as Metaphysical Harm Part 3: Property 5. Could Embryos and Foetuses be Objects of Property? 6. Should Embryos and Foetuses be Objects of Property? 7. Conclusion