E-Book, Englisch, 686 Seiten, Format (B × H): 191 mm x 235 mm
Ross Introduction to Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists
5. Auflage 2013
ISBN: 978-0-12-394842-7
Verlag: Academic Press
Format: EPUB
Kopierschutz: 6 - ePub Watermark
E-Book, Englisch, 686 Seiten, Format (B × H): 191 mm x 235 mm
ISBN: 978-0-12-394842-7
Verlag: Academic Press
Format: EPUB
Kopierschutz: 6 - ePub Watermark
Dr. Sheldon M. Ross is a professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of Southern California. He received his PhD in statistics at Stanford University in 1968. He has published many technical articles and textbooks in the areas of statistics and applied probability. Among his texts are A First Course in Probability, Introduction to Probability Models, Stochastic Processes, and Introductory Statistics. Professor Ross is the founding and continuing editor of the journal Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, a Fellow of INFORMS, and a recipient of the Humboldt US Senior Scientist Award.
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
- Technische Wissenschaften Technik Allgemein Mathematik für Ingenieure
- Interdisziplinäres Wissenschaften Wissenschaften: Forschung und Information Datenanalyse, Datenverarbeitung
- Mathematik | Informatik Mathematik Stochastik Mathematische Statistik
- Mathematik | Informatik Mathematik Stochastik Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung
Weitere Infos & Material
Setting equal to 0 gives
i=1nxi+?i=1nwi=2nµ1+nµ2?i=1nyi+?i=1nwi=nµ1+2nµ2
yielding ^1=2Sxi+Swi-Syi3n,µ^2=2Syi+Swi-Sxi3n
6. The average of the distances is i50.456, and that of the angles is 40.27. Using these estimates the length of the tower, call it , is estimated as follows:
=Xtan?˜127.461
7. With = log(), then = . Because is normal with parameters and s
X=EeY=eµ+s2/2EX2=Ee2Y=e2µ+2s2
giving that
X=e2µ+2s2-e2µ+s2
(c) Taking the sample mean and variance of the logs of the data, yields the estimates that ^=3.7867,s^2=.0647. Hence, the estimate of [] is µ^+s^2/2=45.561.
8. ¯=3.1502
(a). ±1.96.1/5=3.06253.2379
(b). ±12.58.1/5=3.03483.2656
9. ¯=11.48
(a) ±1.96.08/10=11.48±.0496
(b) 8,11.48±1.645.08/10=-8,11.5216
(c) -1.645.08/10,8=11.43848
10. 74.6 ± 1.645(11.3)/9 = 74.6 ± 2.065 = (72.535, 76.665)
11.
(a) Normal with mean 0 and variance 1 + 1/
(b) With probability ,-1.64. Therefore, with 90 percent confidence, n+1?X¯n±1.641+1/n.
12. nµ-X¯/s and so µ
13. ±z.0050.2/20or1.04841.3152
14. ±t.005,19.2/20or1.07201.3280
15. ±t.01,19.2/20=1.31359
16. The size of the confidence interval will be ta/2,n-1Sn/n?2za/2s/n for large. First take a subsample of size 30 and use its sample standard deviation, call it , to estimate s. Now choose the total sample size (= 30 + additional sample size) to be such that za/2se/n=A. The final confidence interval should now use all values.
17. Run program 7-3-1. The 95 percent interval is (331.0572, 336.9345), whereas the 99 percent interval is (330.0082, 337.9836).
18.
(a) (128.14, 138.30)
(b) (-8, 129.03)
(c) (137.41, 8)
19. Using that .05,8 = 1.860, shows that, with 95 percent confidence, the mean price is above
,000-1.86012000/3=129,440114,560
20. 2, 200 ± 1.753(800)/4 = 2, 200 ± 350.6
21. Using that .025,99 = 1.985, show that, with 95 percent confidence, the mean score is in the interval 320 ± 1.985(16)/10 = 320 ± 3.176
22. ±2.09415.4/20,330.2±2.86115.4/20 where the preceding used that .025,19 = 2.0 94, .005,19 = 2.861.
23. ±1.968840/300, since .025,299 = 1.968
24. ±1.284840/300, since .10,299 = 1.284
26. (a) (2013.9, 2111.6), (b) (1996.0,2129.5) (c) 2022.4
27. (93.94, 103.40)
28. (.529, .571)
29. [] =
30. (10.08, 13.05)
31. (85, 442.15, 95, 457.85)
32. n+1-X¯n is normal with mean 0 and variance s2 + s 2/. Hence, [Xn+1-X¯n)2=s21+1/n.
33. (3.382, 6.068)
34. 3.007
36. 32.23, (12.3, 153.83, 167.2), 69.6
37. (.00206, .00529)
38. 3S12+13S22=4
39. .008
40. Use the fact that 2/s2 is chi-square with degrees of freedom, where 2 ? = 1( - )2/. This gives that X¯-µ/T is a t-random variable with n degrees of freedom. The confidence interval is ¯-ta2,nT/n,X¯+ta2,nT/n. The additional degree of freedom is like having an extra observation.
41. (- 22.84, 478.24), (20.91, 8), (-8, 434.49)
42. (- 11.18, - 8.82)
43. (- 11.12, - 8.88)
44. (- 74.97, 41.97)
45. Using that
y2/s22Sx2/s12
has an F-distribution with parameters - 1 and - 1 gives the following 100(1 – ) percent confidence interval for 12/22
1-a/2,m-1,n-1Sx2/Sy2,Fa/2,m-1,n-1Sx2/Sy2
47.
(a) .396 ± .024 [.372, .42]
(b) .389 ± .037 [.352, .426]
48. .17 ± .018, .107 ± .015
49. .5106 ± .010, .5106 ± .013
50. 1692
51. no
52. 2401
53. .00579×61/140/140=.108
54. ±17×.83/100=.096,.244,.073,.267
55. .67 An additional sample of size 2024 is needed.
57. (21.1, 74.2)
58. Since
{2?Xi/?>?1-a,2n2}=1-a
it follows that the lower confidence interval is given by
<2?Xi/?1-a,2n2
Similarly, a 100(1 – ) percent upper confidence interval for is
<2?Xi/?a,2n2
60. Since Var[( - 1)2/2] = 2( - 1) it follows that Var(2) = 24/( - 1) and similarly Var(2) = 24/( - 1). Hence, using Example 5.5b which shows that the best weights are inversely proportional to the variances, it follows that the pooled estimator is best.
61. As the risk of 1 is 6 whereas that of 2 is also 6 they are equally good.
62. Since the number of accidents over the next 10 days is Poisson with mean 10 k it follows that {83|?} = e- 10?(10?)83/83!. Hence,
?|83=P83|?e-??P83|?e-?d?=c?83e-11?
where does not depend on . Since this is the gamma density with parameters 84.11 it has mean 84/11 = 7.64 which is thus the Bayes estimate. The maximum likelihood estimate is 8.3. (The reason that the Bayes estimate is smaller is that it incorporates our initial belief that can be thought of as being the value of an exponential random variable with mean 1.)
63. ?|x1…xn=fx1…xn|?g?/c=c?ne-?Sxie-??2=c?n+2e-?1+Sxi
where × (1 … ) does not depend on ?. Thus we see that the posterior distribution of is the gamma distribution with parameters + 3.1 + S: and so the Bayes estimate is ( + 3)/(1 + S), the mean of the posterior distribution. In our problem this yields the estimate 23/93.
64. The posterior density of is, from Equation (5.5.2) (|data) = 11!(1 - )10 - /1!(10 - )! where is the number of defectives in the sample of 10. In all cases the desired probability is obtained by integrating this density from equal 0 to equal .2. This has to be done numerically as the above does not have a closed form integral.
65 The posterior distribution is normal with mean 80/89(182) + 9/89(200) = 183.82 and...




