Private Selbstregulierung am Beispiel des Kapitalmarktrechts

Vorteile, Nachteile, Optimierung
1. Auflage 2011
ISBN: 978-3-89971-861-4
Verlag: V & R Unipress GmbH

Buch, Deutsch, Band 009, 288 Seiten, Format (B × H): 172 mm x 247 mm, Gewicht: 638 g

Reihe: Bank- und Kapitalmarktrecht

Private self-regulation in the area of capital markets has been the target of increasing criticism in the recent past, despite the fact of its steadily growing practical importance. This dissertation is lead by the scientific question in which way private self-regulation can be used and improved as an instrument of control. It displays and explains conceptual fundamental principles and explores the limits of private self-regulation. Advantages and disadvantages are examined with regard to their conflicting areas and based on these results the author demonstrates an approach on how to improve and optimize it. Especially the advantages of expertise and of acceptance turned out to be a tool useful in many ways. Furthermore, the “Prozeduralisierung” proved to be helpful in order to compensate for existing deficits in constitutional legality and to increase the development towards public welfare of those involved. In the end, a combination of liberal approaches accompanied by governmental measures is paramount for the success of this manifestation of law.

Autoren/Hrsg.

Wahlers, Christiane

Weitere Mitwirkende

Buck-Heeb, Petra

Meder, Stephan

Fachgebiete

• Rechtswissenschaften Wirtschaftsrecht Kapitalmarkt- und Wertpapierrecht

Leseproben

Private self-regulation in the area of capital markets has been the target of increasing criticism in the recent past, despite the fact of its steadily growing practical importance. This dissertation is lead by the scientific question in which way private self-regulation can be used and improved as an instrument of control. It displays and explains conceptual fundamental principles and explores the limits of private self-regulation. Advantages and disadvantages are examined with regard to their conflicting areas and based on these results the author demonstrates an approach on how to improve and optimize it. Especially the advantages of expertise and of acceptance turned out to be a tool useful in many ways. Furthermore, the “Prozeduralisierung” proved to be helpful in order to compensate for existing deficits in constitutional legality and to increase the development towards public welfare of those involved. In the end, a combination of liberal approaches accompanied by governmental measures is paramount for the success of this manifestation of law.>

Über Autor(innen)

Meder, Stephan
Prof. Dr. Stephan Meder lehrt seit 1998 Zivilrecht und Rechtsgeschichte an der Juristischen Fakultät der Universität Hannover.

Wahlers, Christiane
Dr. Christiane Wahlers schloss ihr Studium der Rechtswissenschaft an den Universitäten Augsburg und Hannover 2008 mit dem Ersten Staatsexamen ab. Den juristischen Vorbereitungsdienst absolviert sie am Landgerichtsbezirk Wiesbaden.

Dr. Christiane Wahlers schloss ihr Studium der Rechtswissenschaft an den Universitäten Augsburg und Hannover 2008 mit dem Ersten Staatsexamen ab. Den juristischen Vorbereitungsdienst absolviert sie am Landgerichtsbezirk Wiesbaden.