Stasis and Polemos
Buch, Englisch, 207 Seiten, Format (B × H): 148 mm x 210 mm, Gewicht: 291 g
ISBN: 978-3-658-48799-7
Verlag: Springer
The volume presented here seeks to shift the concept of “media” from its traditional domain to the political field. Media are not merely to be understood as an intellectual or aesthetic (communicative, linguistic, written, technical, profit-rational, instrumental, hermeneutic, or mathematical-informational), but rather as a political state of emergency. This “media theory” therefore addresses the question of “why humanity, instead of entering a truly human state, is sinking into a new kind of barbarism” (Adorno/Horkheimer). According to our thesis, this is a medial question—one that arises from the original „inverse setting” () of media—and it subsequently determines their historical, societal, social, and political development. The main thesis of this book is that we are no longer dealing with media as a theoretical, technical-aesthetic, or informational game. Rather, we are dealing with a political state of emergency, where the issue is truth or falsehood within the and its prevailing laws. These are two fundamentally different domains—intellectual and aesthetic play on the one hand, and on the other—that must not be confused, because the latter is existential and concerns life or death.
Today, media themselves have become cultural, technical, economic, and political “weapons,” concealing both their “essence” and “non-essence.” As a result, the once metaphorical character of “technicist media theory”—“war as the essence of media” (Kittler)—has been lost, and media have been transferred into the political, geopolitical, financial, and informational-economic realm. Kittler’s media-theoretical thesis (media as “military equipment”: media as repurposed war devices, misunderstood in their function as long as their primary military purpose is ignored) is, according to our thesis in this book, not to be understood as “technical,” but as (state-related) and (pre-state). Media theory thus becomes Stasiology (theory of civil war) and Polemology (theory of war). This principle the focus on all media in the public sphere, such that the “agonistic” principle of struggle (C. Mouffe) is merely a preliminary stage and still remains within the realm of play. Therefore, our concluding thesis is that we do not need a technical, hermeneutic, aesthetic, phenomenological, anthropological, or ontological to explain the essence or non-essence of media. What we need is a and a capable of unlocking the entire field of media in the public sphere. Only this of media in the public sphere allows us to move beyond the antagonistic-polemical principle itself.
Zielgruppe
Research
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
- Sozialwissenschaften Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften Medienwissenschaften
- Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Sozialphilosophie, Politische Philosophie
- Sozialwissenschaften Politikwissenschaft Politikwissenschaft Allgemein Politische Theorie, Politische Philosophie
- Sozialwissenschaften Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften Kommunikationswissenschaften
Weitere Infos & Material
Introduction.- Media, their origin, their political and economic history.- Media as hostile affect economy and “gift”.- Performativity of the medial, nature and gender.- Media as weapons of war.- Media of play and enmity.- Platforms, acclamations, and the antagonistic-polemical character of media.- Hostile communication and the darkness of enlightened media.- Liberalism, totality, and imperative ought.- Media of totalization and detotalization of the liberal and illiberal network and citizen-state.- Thinking together the “turning point” in corona policy and in the new wars.- The medium as the site of monotheistic and polytheistic media economies.- Parmenidean distinction: discursive-aesthetic play and deadly-political seriousness.- The “ontological rooting of capital”.- Sociology in the service of imperatives.- Media of the inverted revolution.- Media as practices of liberation.- Conclusion.




