Buch, Englisch, Band 7, 306 Seiten, Paperback, Format (B × H): 155 mm x 235 mm, Gewicht: 482 g
Reihe: Law and Visual Jurisprudence
Buch, Englisch, Band 7, 306 Seiten, Paperback, Format (B × H): 155 mm x 235 mm, Gewicht: 482 g
Reihe: Law and Visual Jurisprudence
ISBN: 978-3-031-14826-2
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Zielgruppe
Research
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
Weitere Infos & Material
Dignity / Autonomy of the Law / Human Rights / Comparable Personal Autonomies: Introducing an Indispensable Generating Series (and its Productive “Phantoms”).- Part 1 Exploring the “Conceptual Bonds” between Human Rights and Human Dignity.- From Human Rights to Human Dignity and vice versa.- Models of Consensus and Compromise on Human Rights and Dignity.- The Foundation of Human Rights, Dignity or Autonomy?.- Part 2 Exploring the Problem of The Autonomy of Law in the Trends of Contemporary Legal Discourse(s).- Hart, Raz and Kelsen on the Puzzle of Law’s Autonomy.- Constructivist Metaphors and Law´s Autonomy in Legal Post-Positivism.- Part 3 Intertwining the Claim to Autonomy and the Concept of Human Dignity.- Merit, Value and Justification: Human Dignity vis-à-vis Legal (Inter)subjectivity – The Autonomy of Subjects Within the Autonomy of Law.- Between Principles and Rules. An itinerary around Law’s Morality and Human Dignity.- The Legal Meaning of Human Dignity: Respect for Autonomy and Concern for Vulnerability.- Part 4 Dialogues with Emmanuel Levinas.- The Double Sense of the Law-Dignity Relationship in Emmanuel Levinas.- Human Rights, Rights of The Other, and Preventive Peace. A Levinasian perspective.- Part 5 Dialogues with Jeremy Waldron.- No Argument: Human Dignity and The Making of Legislation.- Is dignity a noncontingent autonomously juridical “idea”? A conversation piece with Jeremy Waldron.- Part 6 Exploring Human Dignity in the Boundaries of Law.- Does Dignity Promote Law's Autonomy or Undermine It? The Israeli Controversy.- Images and Counter-images of humanitas: A Jusaesthetic Approach to the Problem of Law’s Normative Validity: Beyond the Blindness-and-Sightedness Polarity.