Blomkvist Euthalian Traditions

Text, Translation and Commentary
1. Auflage 2012
ISBN: 978-3-11-029196-4
Verlag: De Gruyter
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: 1 - PDF Watermark

E-Book, Englisch, 403 Seiten

Reihe: ISSN

The ?Euthalian apparatus’ is a corpus of auxiliary texts that summarize Acts and the New Testament Letters. The material is found in a great number of Greek biblical manuscripts. Some sources identify the author as ?Euthalius, bishop of Sulci’, but almost nothing is known about this figure.

Vemund Blomkvist’s study is based on the idea that the biblical text and the apparatus form a ?system’, and that this system may be studied as a unity. The commentary shows that the different genres of the apparatus offer quite different paraphrases of the apostolic writings: The argumenta present a radicalized interpretation of Paul’s theology, while the chapter titles seem to be closer to the biblical text. Together with Prof. David Hellholm, Blomkvist has published a study on the meta-terminology of the apparatus (?Paraenesis as an ancient genre-designation’, 2002), also included in the present volume.

Zielgruppe

Academics, Libraries, Institutes

Autoren/Hrsg.

Blomkvist, Vemund

Fachgebiete

• Geisteswissenschaften Christentum, Christliche Theologie Bibelwissenschaften Neues Testament: Exegese, Geschichte

Inhaltsverzeichnis

1;Preface;11
2;Part One. Introductory Issues;13
2.1;I. Introductory Issues;15
2.1.1;1. Introduction;15
2.1.1.1;1.1. What is the ‘Euthalian Apparatus’?;15
2.1.1.2;1.2. Manuscript Evidence and Editions;17
2.1.2;2. History of Research;20
2.1.2.1;2.1. Survey;20
2.1.2.2;2.2. Conclusions;43
2.1.3;3. Aim and Structure of the Study;45
2.1.3.1;3.1. The Euthalian Apparatus and the Biblical Text;45
2.1.3.2;3.2. The Sequence and Style of the Present Commentary;46
2.1.3.3;3.3. Themes of the Commentary;48
2.1.3.3.1;3.3.1. The Pre-text;48
2.1.3.3.2;3.3.2. The Meta-terminology of the Apparatus;48
2.1.3.3.3;3.3.3. The Apparatus as Paraphrase;52
2.1.3.3.4;3.3.4. Parallel Materials;54
3;Part Two. Text and Translation;55
3.1;II. The Euthalian .ef..a.a, .p...se.. and ........;57
3.1.1;.ef..a.a;57
3.1.2;.p...se..;85
3.1.3;........;111
4;Part Three. Commentary;131
4.1;III. Commentary;133
4.1.1;1. Commentary on the .ef..a.a-t.t...;133
4.1.1.1;1.1. The Genre .ef..a.a-t.t...;133
4.1.1.2;1.2. The Structure of the Euthalian .ef..a.a-t.t...;135
4.1.1.3;1.3. The .ef..a.a-t.t... and the Division of the Pre-text;136
4.1.1.4;1.4. The meta-terminology of the Euthalian .ef..a.a-t.t...;137
4.1.1.4.1;1.4.1. .......S.S;137
4.1.1.4.2;1.4.2. .......S.S;141
4.1.1.4.3;1.4.3. ......S...;142
4.1.1.4.4;1.4.4. ....;146
4.1.1.4.5;1.4.5. .........S;148
4.1.1.5;1.5. The meta-terminology of the .ef..a.a-t.t...: Concluding Remarks;150
4.1.1.6;1.6. Transformations and Additions to the Pre-text;151
4.1.1.7;1.7. The ‘Paulusbild’ of the .ef..a.a-t.t...;152
4.1.2;2. Commentary on the .p...se..;154
4.1.2.1;2.1. The Genre .p..es..;154
4.1.2.2;2.2. The Hypotheses of the Pauline Letters;159
4.1.2.2.1;2.2.1. Authorship;159
4.1.2.2.2;2.2.2. Structure;159
4.1.2.2.3;2.2.3. ... t.: An Ancient Introduction to the .p...se.. of the Pauline Letters;159
4.1.2.2.4;2.2.4. Hypothesis of Romans;160
4.1.2.2.5;2.2.5. Hypothesis of 1 Corinthians;166
4.1.2.2.6;2.2.6. Hypothesis of 2 Corinthians;169
4.1.2.2.7;2.2.7. Hypothesis of Galatians;172
4.1.2.2.8;2.2.8. Hypothesis of Ephesians;173
4.1.2.2.9;2.2.10. Hypothesis of Colossians;177
4.1.2.2.10;2.2.11. Hypothesis of 1 Thessalonians;179
4.1.2.2.11;2.2.12. Hypothesis of 2 Thessalonians;180
4.1.2.2.12;2.2.13. Hypothesis of Hebrews;182
4.1.2.2.13;2.2.14. Hypothesis 1 Timothy;183
4.1.2.2.14;2.2.15. Hypothesis of 2 Timothy;184
4.1.2.2.15;2.2.16. Hypothesis of Titus;184
4.1.2.2.16;2.2.17. Hypothesis of Philemon;185
4.1.2.2.17;2.2.18. The Hypotheses of the Pauline Letters: Summary;186
4.1.2.3;2.3. The Hypotheses of the Catholic Letters;188
4.1.2.3.1;2.3.1. Authorship;188
4.1.2.3.2;2.3.2. Structure;188
4.1.2.3.3;2.3.3. Hypothesis of James;190
4.1.2.3.4;2.3.4. Hypothesis of 1 Peter;191
4.1.2.3.5;2.3.5. Hypothesis of 2 Peter;194
4.1.2.3.6;2.3.6. Hypothesis of 1 John;195
4.1.2.3.7;2.3.7. Hypothesis of 2 John;197
4.1.2.3.8;2.3.8. Hypothesis of 3 John;198
4.1.2.3.9;2.3.9. Hypothesis of Jude;198
4.1.2.3.10;2.3.10. The Hypotheses of the Catholic Letters: Summary;200
4.1.2.4;2.4. Hypothesis of Acts;189
4.1.2.5;2.5. The List of Apostles and Deacons;204
4.1.2.6;2.6. The List of Wonders;204
4.1.2.7;2.7. The Hypotheses: Summary;205
4.1.3;3. Commentary on the Prologues;206
4.1.3.1;3.1. The Genre ‘Prologue’;206
4.1.3.2;3.2. Commentary on the Prologue to the Letters of Paul;208
4.1.3.2.1;3.2.1. Structure of the Prologue to the Letters of Paul;208
4.1.3.2.2;3.2.2. The Heading to the Prologue to the Letters of Paul;209
4.1.3.2.3;3.2.3. Prologus praeter rem;209
4.1.3.2.3.1;3.2.3.1. The Genre ‘Prooemium’;209
4.1.3.2.3.2;3.2.3.2. Comments on the ‘Prooemium’;210
4.1.3.2.4;3.2.4. Prologus ante rem;212
4.1.3.2.4.1;3.2.4.1. The ‘Life of Paul’;212
4.1.3.2.4.2;3.2.4.2. The ‘Epitome of the Pauline Letters’;218
4.1.3.2.4.3;3.2.4.3. The ‘Editorial Notice’;223
4.1.3.2.4.4;3.2.4.4. The ‘Chronicle of the Preaching of Paul’;225
4.1.3.2.5;3.2.5. Prologue to the Letters of Paul: Summary;228
4.1.3.3;3.3. Commentary on the Prologue to the Catholic Letters;230
4.1.3.3.1;3.3.1. Structure of the Prologue to the Catholic Letters;230
4.1.3.3.2;3.3.2. The Heading to the Prologue to the Catholic Letters;230
4.1.3.3.3;3.3.3. Prologus praeter rem;230
4.1.3.3.3.1;3.3.3.1. Comments on the ‘Prooemium’;230
4.1.3.3.4;3.3.4. Prologus ante rem;231
4.1.3.3.4.1;3.3.4.1. Comments on the ‘Editorial Notice’;231
4.1.3.3.5;3.3.5. The Prologue to the Catholic letters: Summary;232
4.1.3.4;3.4. Commentary on the Prologue to Acts;232
4.1.3.4.1;3.4.1. Structure of the Prologue to Acts;232
4.1.3.4.2;3.4.2. The Heading to the Prologue to Acts;233
4.1.3.4.3;3.4.3. Prologus praeter rem;233
4.1.3.4.3.1;3.4.3.1. Comments on the ‘Prooemium’;233
4.1.3.4.3.2;3.4.3.2. The ‘Encomium of Melete’;235
4.1.3.4.4;3.4.4. Prologus ante rem;236
4.1.3.4.4.1;3.4.4.1. Comments on the ‘Editorial Notice’;236
4.1.3.4.4.2;3.4.4.2. Comments on the ‘Epitome of Acts’;237
4.1.3.4.5;3.4.5. Prologue to Acts: Summary;238
4.1.3.5;3.5. The Prologues: Summary;238
5;Part Four. Résumé;241
5.1;IV. Resume;243
5.1.1;1. Introduction;243
5.1.2;2. Aim of the Present Commentary;244
5.1.3;3. The Meta-terminology of the Euthalian Apparatus;245
5.1.4;4. The ‘Paulusbild’;247
5.1.5;5. The Catholic Letters in the Euthalian Apparatus;252
5.1.6;6. Acts in the Euthalian Apparatus;253
5.1.7;7. The Composition of the Euthalian Editions;254
5.1.8;8. The Ancient and Medieval Parallel Materials in Relation to the Euthalian apparatus;256
5.1.9;9. Comparison of the Parallel Materials;258
6;Part Five. Appendices;263
6.1;V. Appendix I;265
6.1.1;1. ‘Marcionite’ Prologues;265
6.1.2;2. Edition of Priscillian;267
6.1.3;3. Theodoret’s Arguments;281
6.1.4;4. Theophylact’s Arguments;298
6.2;VI. Appendix II;311
6.2.1;1. What is a Genre-Designation?;311
6.2.2;2. Parainesis – paraineo – parainetikos as Genre-Designation;314
6.2.2.1;2.1. A short History of parainesis as Genre-Designation;314
6.2.2.2;2.2. The Evidence from Euthalius;316
6.2.2.2.1;2.2.1. Evidence from the Chapter-Lists (CAP);317
6.2.2.2.2;2.2.2. Evidence from the Affiliated Argumenta;348
6.2.2.3;2.3. Evidence From Ps-Libanios or Ps-Proclos;352
6.2.3;3. Conclusion;355
7;Bibliography;357
8;Index of Modern Authors;389
9;Index of Passages;395

Über Autor(innen)

Vemund Blomkvist, University of Oslo, Norway.