Hicks Welded Design

Theory and Practice
1. Auflage 2000
ISBN: 978-1-85573-762-4
Verlag: Elsevier Science & Techn.
Format: EPUB
Kopierschutz: Adobe DRM (»Systemvoraussetzungen)

E-Book, Englisch, 160 Seiten

Welded design is often considered as an area in which there's lots of practice but little theory. Welded design tends to be overlooked in engineering courses and many engineering students and engineers find materials and metallurgy complicated subjects. Engineering decisions at the design stage need to take account of the properties of a material - if these decisions are wrong failures and even catastrophes can result. Many engineering catastrophes have their origins in the use of irrelevant or invalid methods of analysis, incomplete information or the lack of understanding of material behaviour.The activity of engineering design calls on the knowledge of a variety of engineering disciplines. With his wide engineering background and accumulated knowledge, John Hicks is able to show how a skilled engineer may use materials in an effective and economic way and make decisions on the need for the positioning of joints, be they permanent or temporary, between similar and dissimilar materials.This book provides practising engineers, teachers and students with the necessary background to welding processes and methods of design employed in welded fabrication. It explains how design practices are derived from experimental and theoretical studies to produce practical and economic fabrication. - Provides specialist information on a topic often omitted from engineering courses - Explains why certain methods are used, and also gives examples of commonly performed calculations and derivation of data.

Autoren/Hrsg.

Hicks, J.

Leseproben

1 The engineer
Publisher Summary
This chapter focuses on the responsibilities and achievements of an engineer in the field of welding. An engineer’s responsibility to society requires that not only he keeps up to date with the ever faster changing knowledge and practices but also that he recognizes the boundaries of his own knowledge. The engineer devises and makes structures and devices to perform duties or achieve results. Most engineering projects require the contributions of a variety of engineering disciplines in a team. One of the members of that team in many products or projects is the welding engineer. The execution of the responsibilities of the welding engineer takes place at the interface of a number of conventional technologies. For contributing to the design of the welded product, these include structural and mechanical engineering, material processing, weldability and performance, and corrosion science. For the setting up and operation of welding plant, they include electrical, mechanical and production engineering, and the physics and chemistry of gases. In addition, the welding engineer must be familiar with the general management of industrial processes and personnel, as well as the health and safety aspects of the welding operations and materials. 1.1 Responsibility of the engineer
As we enter the third millennium annis domini, most of the world’s population continues increasingly to rely on man-made and centralised systems for producing and distributing food and medicines and for converting energy into usable forms. Much of these systems relies on the, often unrecognised, work of engineers. The engineer’s responsibility to society requires that not only does he keep up to date with the ever faster changing knowledge and practices but that he recognises the boundaries of his own knowledge. The engineer devises and makes structures and devices to perform duties or achieve results. In so doing he employs his knowledge of the natural world and the way in which it works as revealed by scientists, and he uses techniques of prediction and simulation developed by mathematicians. He has to know which materials are available to meet the requirements, their physical and chemical characteristics and how they can be fashioned to produce an artefact and what treatment they must be given to enable them to survive the environment. The motivation and methods of working of the engineer are very different from those of a scientist or mathematician. A scientist makes observations of the natural world, offers hypotheses as to how it works and conducts experiments to test the validity of his hypothesis; thence he tries to derive an explanation of the composition, structure or mode of operation of the object or the mechanism. A mathematician starts from the opposite position and evolves theoretical concepts by means of which he may try to explain the behaviour of the natural world, or the universe whatever that may be held to be. Scientists and the mathematicians both aim to seek the truth without compromise and although they may publish results and conclusions as evidence of their findings their work can never be finished. In contrast the engineer has to achieve a result within a specified time and cost and rarely has the resources or the time to be able to identify and verify every possible piece of information about the environment in which the artefact has to operate or the response of the artefact to that environment. He has to work within a degree of uncertainty, expressed by the probability that the artefact will do what is expected of it at a defined cost and for a specified life. The engineer’s circumstance is perhaps summarised best by the oft quoted request: ‘I don’t want it perfect, I want it Thursday!’ Once the engineer’s work is complete he cannot go back and change it without disproportionate consequences; it is there for all to see and use. The ancient Romans were particularly demanding of their bridge engineers; the engineer’s name had to be carved on a stone in the bridge, not to praise the engineer but to know who to execute if the bridge should collapse in use! People place their lives in the hands of engineers every day when they travel, an activity associated with which is a predictable probability of being killed or injured by the omissions of their fellow drivers, the mistakes of professional drivers and captains or the failings of the engineers who designed, manufactured and maintained the mode of transport. The engineer’s role is to be seen not only in the vehicle itself, whether that be on land, sea or air, but also in the road, bridge, harbour or airport, and in the navigational aids which abound and now permit a person to know their position to within a few metres over and above a large part of the earth. Human error is frequently quoted as the reason for a catastrophe and usually means an error on the part of a driver, a mariner or a pilot. Other causes are often lumped under the catch-all category of mechanical failure as if such events were beyond the hand of man; a naïve attribution, if ever there were one, for somewhere down the line people were involved in the conception, design, manufacture and maintenance of the device. It is therefore still human error which caused the problem even if not of those immediately involved. If we need to label the cause of the catastrophe, what we should really do is to place it in one of, say, four categories, all under the heading of human error, which would be failure in specification, design, operation or maintenance. An ‘Act of God’ so beloved by judges is a get-out. It usually means a circumstance or set of circumstances which a designer, operator or legislator ought to have been able to predict and allow for but chose to ignore. If this seems very harsh we have only to look at the number of lives lost in bulk carriers at sea in the past years. There still seems to be a culture in seafaring which accepts that there are unavoidable hazards and which are reflected in the nineteenth century hymn line‘… for those in peril on the sea’. Even today there are cultures in some countries which do not see death or injury by man-made circumstances as preventable or even needing prevention; concepts of risk just do not exist in some places. That is not to say that any activity can be free of hazards; we are exposed to hazards throughout our life. What the engineer should be doing is to conduct activities in such a way that the probability of not surviving that hazard is known and set at an accepted level for the general public, leaving those who wish to indulge in high risk activities to do so on their own. We place our lives in the hands of engineers in many more ways than these obvious ones. When we use domestic machines such as microwave ovens with their potentially injurious radiation, dishwashers and washing machines with a potentially lethal 240 V supplied to a machine running in water into which the operator can safely put his or her hands. Patients place their lives in the hands of engineers when they submit themselves to surgery requiring the substitution of their bodily functions by machines which temporarily take the place of their hearts, lungs and kidneys. Others survive on permanent replacements for their own bodily parts with man-made implants be they valves, joints or other objects. An eminent heart surgeon said on television recently that heart transplants were simple; although this was perhaps a throwaway remark one has to observe that if it is simple for him, which seems unlikely, it is only so because of developments in immunology, on post-operative critical care and on anaesthesia (not just the old fashioned gas but the whole substitution and maintenance of complete circulatory and pulmonary functions) which enables it to be so and which relies on complex machinery requiring a high level of engineering skill in design, manufacturing and maintenance. We place our livelihoods in the hands of engineers who make machinery whether it be for the factory or the office. Businesses and individuals rely on telecommunications to communicate with others and for some it would seem that life without television and a mobile telephone would be at best meaningless and at worst intolerable. We rely on an available supply of energy to enable us to use all of this equipment, to keep ourselves warm and to cook our food. It is the engineer who converts the energy contained in and around the Earth and the Sun to produce this supply of usable energy to a remarkable level of reliability and consistency be it in the form of fossil fuels or electricity derived from them or nuclear reactions. 1.2 Achievements of the engineer
The achievements of the engineer during the second half of the twentieth century are perhaps most popularly recognised in the development of digital computers and other electronically based equipment through the exploitation of the discovery of semi-conductors, or transistors as they came to be known. The subsequent growth in the diversity of the use of computers could hardly have been expected to have taken place had we continued to rely on the thermionic valve invented by Sir Alexander Fleming in 1904, let alone the nineteenth century mechanical calculating engine of William Babbage. However let us not forget that at the beginning of the twenty-first century the visual displays of most computers and telecommunications equipment still rely on the technology...