Jones / Haykin Drawn into Controversie

Reformed Theological Diversity and Debates Within Seventeenth-Century British Puritanism
1. Auflage 2011
ISBN: 978-3-647-56945-1
Verlag: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: 0 - No protection

E-Book, Englisch, Band Band 017, 336 Seiten

Reihe: Reformed Historical Theology

By their very nature, traditions are diverse. This is particularly the case with theological traditions, even including those cases where they have been named for a single individual (e.g. Augustinianism, Thomism, Lutheranism, and Calvinism). In the eras of the Reformation and of Reformed orthodoxy there was intense theological debate, leading to confessional identity and confessional boundaries; hence the Remonstrant controversy in the early seventeenth century. What the essays of this volume look at, however, are the debates that took place within the Reformed theological tradition, particularly within Puritan England. Some of the debates considered here threatened to rise to a confessional level whereas others were not so serious insofar as they did not press on confessional boundaries. The Puritan tradition surveyed in these essays looks at both major and minor intra-Reformed debates. Most of these debates analyzed have been passed over in the older scholarship in its quest to find the few true Calvinians to oppose to the so-called Calvinists. By contrast, none of the studies included in the present volume brands one side of a seventeenth-century debate as un-Calvinian or identifies an alteration of doctrinal perspective as a declension from Reformation-era purity. Calvin no longer appears as a norm, although he does appear, with other Reformers, as an antecedent of certain lines of argument. Lastly, the essays document the ongoing concern among Reformed theologians to further the Reformation cause. In this pursuit, Reformed theologians, as they did during the time of the Reformation theologians, often found themselves disagreeing on a number of theological doctrines.

Dr. theol. Michael Haykin is Professor of Church History and Biblical Spirituality at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky.

Autoren/Hrsg.

Jones, Mark

Haykin, Michael A. G.

Weitere Mitwirkende

Fesko, John V.

Gribben, Crawford

Trueman, Carl R.

Moore, Jonathan D.

Strange, Alan D.

McKelvey, Robert J.

Herzer, Mark A.

Powell, Hunter

Robinson, C. Jeffrey

Beeke, Joel R.

Fachgebiete

• Geisteswissenschaften Christentum, Christliche Theologie Kirchengeschichte
• Geisteswissenschaften Christentum, Christliche Theologie Systematische Theologie Geschichte der Theologie, Einzelne Theologen
• Geisteswissenschaften Christentum, Christliche Theologie Christliche Kirchen, Konfessionen, Denominationen Protestantismus, evangelische und protestantische Kirchen Reformierte Kirchen, Calvinisten, presbyterianische Kirchen

Inhaltsverzeichnis

1;Contents;6
2;Preface;11
3;1. Diversity in the Reformed Tradition: A Historiographical Introduction;12
3.1;1.1 Introduction: Tradition, Diversity, and the Interpretation of Reformed Thought;12
3.2;1.2 Debate Within the Reformed Tradition;18
3.3;1.3 Debates Concerning Confessional Boundaries – Crossing Over or Pressing the Boundary;19
3.4;1.4 Debates Over Philosophical Issues;23
3.5;1.5 Debates Concerning Issues of Significant Import that Threatened to Rise to a Confessional Level;24
3.6;1.6 Debates over Theological Topics that did not Press on Confessional Boundaries;26
3.7;1.7 Concluding Comment;30
4;2. The Imputation of the Active Obedience of Christ at the Westminster Assembly;32
4.1;2.1 Introduction;32
4.2;2.2 Historiography;33
4.3;2.3 Recent Evidence;36
4.4;2.4 Article 11 of the Thirty-Nine Articles;37
4.5;2.5 The Problem of Antinomianism;39
4.6;2.6 Vines, Gataker, and Twisse;40
4.7;2.7 The Wider Context of the Westminster Assembly;47
4.8;2.8 Conclusion;51
5;3. October 1643: The Dissenting Brethren and the Proton Dektikon;53
5.1;3.1 Introduction;53
5.2;3.2 “The builders must have a platform”;57
5.3;3.3 “We are now on the foundation of all”;61
5.4;3.4 The Grand Charter of the Church;65
5.5;3.5 The Apologists’ Proton Dektikon;68
5.6;3.6 Ecclesiae Primae and Ecclesiae Ortae: “an untrodden path”;72
5.7;3.7 A break from “the fathers & the schoolmen”;80
5.8;3.8 Conclusion;83
6;4. Millennialism;84
6.1;4.1 Introduction;84
6.2;4.2 The Tradition Established;86
6.3;4.3 The Tradition Challenged;93
6.4;4.4 Conclusion;98
7;5. Lapsarian Diversity at the Synod of Dort;100
7.1;5.1 Introduction;100
7.2;5.2 The Debate over Infra- and Supralapsarianism;103
7.3;5.3 The Supralapsarian Position;108
7.4;5.4 The Infralapsarian Position;112
7.5;5.5 The Lapsarian Outcome of the Canons;115
7.6;5.6 Analysis of the Outcome;118
7.7;5.7 The Maccovius Case;120
7.8;5.8 Was Supralapsarianism Rejected?;121
7.9;5.9 Why no Rejection of Supralapsarianism?;122
7.10;5.10 Summary;123
7.11;5.11 Conclusion;124
8;6. The Extent of the Atonement: English Hypothetical Universalism versus Particular Redemption;125
8.1;6.1 Introduction;125
8.2;6.2 John Owen & Particular Redemption;126
8.3;6.3 John Davenant & English Hypothetical Universalism;137
8.4;6.4 English Hypothetical Universalism & Reformed Confessions;144
8.5;6.5 The Case of Richard Baxter;153
8.6;6.6 A Softening of Reformed Theology?;157
9;7. Adam’s Reward: Heaven or Earth?;163
9.1;7.1 Introduction;163
9.2;7.2 Thomas Goodwin (1600–1680);166
9.3;7.3 Francis Turretin (1623–1687);170
9.4;7.4 Examining Their Positions;172
9.5;7.5 Seventeenth-Century Divines and Adam’s Reward;176
9.6;7.6 Conclusion;182
10;8. The “Old” Covenant;184
10.1;8.1 Introduction;184
10.2;8.2 Taxonomies;188
10.3;8.3 The Majority Position: “Dichotomist”;190
10.4;8.4 Foedus Subserviens: “Trichotomist”;195
10.5;8.5 John Owen: Dichotomist or Trichotomist?;200
10.6;8.6 Conclusion;203
11;9. The Necessity of the Atonement;205
11.1;9.1 Introduction;205
11.2;9.2 Owen’s Early Position;207
11.3;9.3 The Argument of the Dissertation;210
11.4;9.4 The Evidence for Essential Vindicatory Justice;214
11.5;9.5 Revelation and the Doctrine of God;218
11.6;9.6 Conclusion;222
12;10. “That Error and Pillar of Antinomianism”: Eternal Justification;224
12.1;10.1 Introduction;224
12.2;10.2 The Antinomian Endorsement;227
12.3;10.3 The Westminster Resistance;238
12.4;10.4 The Anti-Arminian Foundations;247
12.5;10.5 The Anti-Antinomian Connections;256
12.6;10.6 Conclusion;260
13;11. The Assurance Debate: Six Key Questions;264
13.1;11.1 Introduction;264
13.2;11.2 Is the Seed of Assurance Embedded in Faith?;266
13.3;11.3 Is Faith a Condition of the Covenant?;268
13.4;11.4 Is Assurance Primarily Grounded in God’s Promises?;271
13.5;11.5 How Important is Syllogistic Reasoning for Validating Inward Evidences of Grace?;274
13.6;11.6 Does the Inward Witness of the Holy Spirit Coincide with the Inward Evidences of Grace?;277
13.7;11.7 Is Assurance Normative?;282
13.8;11.8 Conclusion;284
14;12. Particular Baptist Debates about Communion and Hymn- Singing;285
14.1;12.1 Introduction;285
14.2;12.2 The Communion Controversy of the 1670s and 1680s;286
14.3;12.3 The Hymn-Singing Controversy of the 1690s;297
14.4;12.4 Isaac Marlow and His Opposition to Hymn-Singing;301
14.5;12.5 Benjamin Keach and an Old Ordinance Reclaimed;305
14.6;12.6 The Outcome;308
15;Bibliography;310
15.1;Primary and Secondary Sources;310
16;About the Authors;334
17;Index;335

Über Autor(innen)

Jones, Mark
Mark Jones, PhD, ist Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter an der Theologischen Fakultät der University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, Südafrika.

McKelvey, Robert J.
Robert J. McKelvey ist Lehrbeauftragter für Historische und Praktische Theologie am John Wycliffe Theological College in Randburg / in Zusammenarbeit mit der North West University in Südafrika.

Fesko, John V.
John V. Fesko ist Dekan und Associate Professor für Systematische und Historische Theologie am Westminster Seminary California in Escondido/Kalifornien.