E-Book, Englisch, Band 132, 99 Seiten, E-Book-Text
Morigiwa / Takikawa Judicial Minimalism – For and Against
1. Auflage 2012
ISBN: 978-3-515-10293-3
Verlag: Franz Steiner
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: 1 - PDF Watermark
Proceedings of the 9th Kobe Lectures. Tokyo, Nagoya, and Kyoto, June 2008
E-Book, Englisch, Band 132, 99 Seiten, E-Book-Text
Reihe: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie ? Beihefte
ISBN: 978-3-515-10293-3
Verlag: Franz Steiner
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: 1 - PDF Watermark
In his Kobe Lecture, Cass Sunstein reflects upon his judicial minimalism, a doctrine asserting that the proper role of the judiciary is to go "narrow and shallow," collectively making minimal changes to its jurisprudence. He goes "beyond judicial minimalism" by reflecting on the goal and conditions that make the minimalist strategy reasonable, culminating in the conclusion that there are situations when a different strategy is more efficient.
Ten commentators carefully examine Sunstein's legal theory, especially his arguments for and against judicial minimalism. Sunstein himself replies to the comments by appealing to the notion of fallibility. This e-book attempts to evaluate the pros and cons of judicial minimalism as an important strategy for legal interpretation.
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
Weitere Infos & Material
1;Table of Contents;6
2;Sunstein on Judicial Minimalism;8
3;The Ninth Kobe Lecture;12
3.1;Beyond Judicial Minimalism;14
4;Commentaries;36
4.1;Incompletely Theorised Rationale for Incompletely Theorised Agreements;38
4.2;Shallow Grounds for Shallow Judicial Decision: A Response to Sunstein;42
4.3;Is There Any Need for the Judges to Go Further?;46
4.4;Beyond Judicial Minimalism, And Then Where to Go?;52
4.5;Can minimalism make the judiciary and the legislature cooperate?;64
4.6;“Putt ing Judicial Minimalism into the Context of the American Constitutional Theory”;68
4.7;Responsibility of the Planner;74
4.8;“Libertarian Paternalism”;76
4.9;We, John Jones, Choose;82
4.10;Sunstein’s Theory for Modern Administrative State: A Potential of Republican Model of Judicial Review.;86
5;Reply;90
5.1;On Fallibility: A Reply;92
6;Notes on the Contributors;98