A 'Blended System' of Judicial Review in Germany

The Use of Weak-Form Methods Within a Strong-Form Review System
1. Auflage 2025
ISBN: 978-3-16-164665-2
Verlag: Mohr Siebeck

Buch, Englisch, 383 Seiten, Leinen, Format (B × H): 155 mm x 232 mm, Gewicht: 148 g

Reihe: Rechtsvergleichung und Rechtsvereinheitlichung

Die Grundrechte des Grundgesetzes können von verschiedenen Staatsorganen unterschiedlich, jedoch gleichermaßen vertretbar ausgelegt werden. Lisa Rabeneick vertritt die Auffassung, dass das Bundesverfassungsgericht zuweilen 'Weak-Form Judicial Review' ausüben und davon absehen sollte, seine Grundrechtsauslegung an die Stelle derer des Parlaments zu setzen, wenn dessen Verständnis gleichermaßen plausibel ist.

Autoren/Hrsg.

Rabeneick, Lisa

Fachgebiete

• Rechtswissenschaften Öffentliches Recht Staats- und Verfassungsrecht

Inhaltsverzeichnis

A. Introduction
I. Proposal of a ‘blended system’ of judicial review - II. Argument for a ‘blended system’ of rights-based judicial review of federal legislation within the German constitutional order
B. An alternative form of judicial review within the German constitutional order
I. Weak-form judicial review and the related international debate -II. Meaning of ‘weak-form and strong-form judicial review’
C. The German strong-form system of rights-based judicial review of legislation
I. Historical decision for a system of constitutional judicial review - II. Existing constitutional design mechanism providing for the court’s strong-form review powers - III. Conclusion and outlook
D. Towards weak-form judicial review in Germany
I. Proposal of a ‘blended system’ of judicial review within the German constitutional order review - II. Absence of weak-form judicial review ideas in Germany - III. Placing the proposal within the German constitutional debate - IV. Concluding observations: Proposal of a blended system within the German constitutional order
E. Benefits of a blended system of rights-based judicial review of legislation within the German constitutional order
I. Previously identified benefits - II. Creating a more appropriate constitutional balance between constitutional principles conflicting in the shape of the court’s strong-form review powers - III. Additional outcome-related constitutional benefits - IV. Conclusion
F. Implementing the proposed blended system on the institutional level
I. Preliminary considerations - II. Defining constitutional constraints - III. Existing room within key constitutional constraints for other forms of weak-form judicial review - IV. Outlook: Additional conversation on the appropriateness of weak-form review
G. Conclusion

Über Autor(innen)

Rabeneick, Lisa
Born in 1995; studied law at the University of Münster and the University of Waikato; 2019 First State Examination in Law; research associate at the Institute for Public Law and Politics at the University of Münster; 2024 doctorate after research visits to the University of New South Wales in Sydney, the University of Melbourne, and the Victoria University of Wellington; legal trainee at the Hanseatic Higher Regional Court.

Born in 1995; studied law at the University of Münster and the University of Waikato; 2019 First State Examination in Law; research associate at the Institute for Public Law and Politics at the University of Münster; 2024 doctorate after research visits to the University of New South Wales in Sydney, the University of Melbourne, and the Victoria University of Wellington; legal trainee at the Hanseatic Higher Regional Court.