Westwood / Clegg Debating Organization
1. Auflage 2009
ISBN: 978-1-4051-4211-3
Verlag: John Wiley & Sons
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: Adobe DRM (»Systemvoraussetzungen)
Point-Counterpoint in Organization Studies
E-Book, Englisch, 424 Seiten, E-Book
ISBN: 978-1-4051-4211-3
Verlag: John Wiley & Sons
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: Adobe DRM (»Systemvoraussetzungen)
This volume introduces readers to the central debates oforganization studies through a series of 'point' and 'counterpoint'debates by major figures in the field.
* * Introduces readers to the central tensions and debates oforganization studies.
* Celebrates the productive heterogeneity of the field by placingcompeting perspectives side by side.
* Includes contributions from major figures in the field.
* Structured in an innovative 'point' and 'counterpoint'format.
Autoren/Hrsg.
Weitere Infos & Material
List of Figures.
Notes on the Contributors.
Acknowledgments.
1. The Discourse of Organization Studies: Dissensus, Politicsand Paradigms: R. Westwood and S. Clegg.
Part I: Foundations:.
2. Organization Studies: a Discipline or Field?.
Commentary: What Kind of Science Should OS Strive to Be?.
From Fields to Science: Can Organization Studies Make theTransition? Bill McKelvey, University of California LosAngeles.
Paradigm Plurality: Exploring Past, Present and Future Trends:Mihaela Kelemen, Keele University, and John Hassard, UMIST.
3. Ontology.
Commentary: Let's Get Ontological.
Order is Free: On the Ontological Status of Organizations:Kimberly B. Boal,Texas Tech University, James G. Hunt, Texas TechUniversity, and Stephen J. Jaros, Southern University.
Ontology: Organizations as World-Making: Robert Chia, Universityof Exeter.
4. Epistemology.
Commentary: On Being Positive and Becoming Constructivist.
Position Statement for Positivism: Lex Donaldson, University ofNew South Wales.
Social Constructionism and Organization Studies: BarbaraCzarniawska, Göteburg University.
5. Methodology.
Commentary: Ironic Authenticity and ParadoxicalConstructivism.
From Subjectivity to Objectivity: A Constructivist Account ofObjectivity in Organization Theory: William McKinley, SouthernIllinois University at Carbondale.
From Objectivity to Subjectivity. Confession of aCounter-Modernist: Pursuing Subjective Authenticity inOrganizational Research: Peter Case, Oxford Brookes University.
Part II: Frames:.
6. Organization: Environment.
Commentary: Enacting/Institutionalizing.
Enacting an Environment: The Infrastructure of Organizing: KarlE. Weick, University of Michigan.
Enactment as an Institutional Change Mechanism: P. DevereauxJennings, University of British Columbia, and Royston Greenwood,University of Alberta.
7. Power and Institutions.
Commentary: The Dynamics of Institution.
The Problem of Order Revisited: Towards a More CriticalInstitutional Perspective: Michael Lounsbury, Cornell University.Power, Discourse and Institutions: Institutional Theory and theChallenge of Critical Discourse Analysis: Nelson Phillips,University of Cambridge.
8. Globalization.
Commentary: The Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion inGlobalization.
The Disorganization of Inclusion: Globalization as Process:Barbara Parker, Seattle University.
Globalization and the Organizations of Exclusion in AdvancedCapitalism: Marc T. Jones, Macquarie University.
Part III: Structure and Culture:.
9. Structure.
Commentary: Organization Structure.
Structure: Bob Hinings, University of Alberta.
Disorganization: Rolland Munro, Keele University.
10. Culture.
Commentary: Making Sense of Culture.
The Case for Culture: Neal M. Ashkanasy, The University ofQueensland.
Instantiative vs Entitiative Culture: The Case for Culture asProcess: Andrew Chan, City University of Hong Kong.
Part IV: Identity and Relationships:.
11. Gender and Identity.
Commentary: Non-debating Gender.
Theorizing Gender and Organizing: Silvia Gherardi,TrentoUniversity, Judi Marshall, University of Bath, Albert J. Mills, StMary's University.
12. Trust.
Commentary: Trust Organizational Psychosis Versus the Virtues ofTrust.
The Virtues of Prudent Trust: Roderick M. Kramer, StanfordUniversity.
Fool'd with Hope, Men Favour the Deceit or: Can We Trust inTrust? Burkard Sievers, Bergische Universität Wuppertal.
13. Question Time: Notes on Altercation StephenLinstead.
Index.