Andel / Andel / Andil Landscape Modelling
1. Auflage 2010
ISBN: 978-90-481-3052-8
Verlag: Springer Netherland
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: 1 - PDF Watermark
Geographical Space, Transformation and Future Scenarios
E-Book, Englisch, Band 8, 226 Seiten, eBook
Reihe: Urban and Landscape Perspectives
ISBN: 978-90-481-3052-8
Verlag: Springer Netherland
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: 1 - PDF Watermark
Zielgruppe
Research
Autoren/Hrsg.
Weitere Infos & Material
Where the Moral Appeal Meets the Scientific Approach.- The Weeping Landscape.- Landscape concept in contemporary Europe.- Present Changes in European Rural Landscapes.- Environmental Stressors as an Integrative Approach to Landscape Assessment.- Between Landscapes and Multi-Scale Regions.- Environment and Regional Cohesion in the Enlarged European Union – Differences in Public Opinion.- Cross-Border Relationships of Small and Medium-Sized Businesses.- Land-Use Changes Along the Iron Curtain in Czechia.- Landscape Function Transformations with Relation to Land-Use Changes.- Changing Face of a Landscape: Identity and Perception.- Memory of a Landscape – A Constituent of Regional Identity and Planning?.- Landscape Change in the Seewinkel: Comparisons Among Centuries.- Conditions of Living – Reality, Reflections, Comparisons and Prospects.- Modelling and Geovisualization in Landscape Planning and Management.- Geovisualisation of an Urban Landscape in Participatory Regional Planning.- DoesLandscape Structure Reveal Ecological Sustainability?.- Landscape Approaches and GIS for Biodiversity Management.- Relief for Models of Natural Phenomena.
"Chapter 3 Environmental Stressors as an Integrative Approach to Landscape Assessment (p. 29-30)
Ji?rí And?el, Martin Balej, and Tomáš Oršulák
3.1 Stressors and Stress in a Landscape
The genesis of the term stress is closely associated with research in the psychological and biological disciplines (e.g. Shanteau & Dino, 1993). Generally, stress is a difficult concept to define. Early definitions varied in the extent to which they emphasized the responses of the individual, or the situations that caused disruptions of ongoing behaviour and functioning (Evans & Cohen, 1987). Appley and Trumbull (1967), McGrath (1970) and Mason (1975) have summarized several objections to each of these approaches to defining stress.
Stress is best considered as a complex rubric reflecting a dynamic, recursive relationship between environmental demands, individual and social resources to cope with those demands, and the individual’s appraisal of that relationship (Evans & Cohen, 1987). A stress-inducing factor is called a stressor. Stress is a manifestation of a stressor within a system. Four general types of environmental stressors have been identified in psychological theory: cataclysmic events, stressful life events, daily hassles, and ambient stressors (Baum, Singer, & Baum, 1982; Cambell, 1983; Lazarus & Cohen, 1977.)
Similar to the definition of stress in psychology, we can designate as a stressor any force or system of forces producing pressure, tension or causing deformity that is detrimental to the system it acts upon. In the context of environmental sciences, stress within an environmental system composed of biotic, abiotic and human elements can be defined as any deformity present in the system. Stress (or pressure, strain, disturbing force, obstacle or difficulty) can thus be defined as any stimulus the intensity of which is in excess of the norm (physical, ecological, social or economic).
In the normal fluctuation of a phenomenon, stress can be represented by an exceptionally strong/weak intensity or unusual frequency. Individual types of environmental systems may react in varying ways to different stressful stimuli. In the initial phase of stress response, a system operates on the principle of resilience, followed by the phase of resistance. In the final phase the system either breaks down entirely (i.e. changes its character) or compensates for the stress and continues to function as before.
Stress therefore can be compensated for entirely or partially, or it may not be compensated at all and the system breaks down. Some landscape ecologists (cf. Ingegnoli, 2002) claim that if the effect of a stressor is continuous (chronic), this may endanger the general “health” of the landscape. The Slovak school of landscape ecology devised a theory of environmental stressors (Miklós et al., 2002; Šúriová & Izakovi?cová, 1995; Izakovi?cová, Miklós, & Drdoš, 1997).
Other landscape ecologists (Ingegnoli, 2002; Lipský, 1998; Antrop, 2000; Erickson, 1999) also employ the terms environmental stressor, stress or anthropogenic pressure in connection with a negative effect on environmental conditions, the pathology of landscape and anthropogenic disturbances. Within a landscape system, there are of course natural stressors such as natural disturbances (degradation processes, natural radiation, volcanism, seismic activity and seismic processes). Environmental systems are able to a greater or lesser extent to prepare for the effects of these stressors."