Jakubowski Man in a new light

Today we stand on the edge of the evolutionary abyss. Do we close our eyes and take the next step forward, or will we open them wide and see our lives in a new light?
1. Auflage 2024
ISBN: 978-3-7597-9165-8
Verlag: Books on Demand
Format: EPUB
Kopierschutz: Adobe DRM (»Systemvoraussetzungen)

E-Book, Englisch, 172 Seiten

This book answers two questions. Firstly: How did our ancestors manage to survive thousands of cosmic, climatic, and environmental catastrophes, and achieve dominion over all other Species of living beings? And secondly: Why are we ourselves destroying our prospects for a bright future for our and subsequent Species of Humans?

Peter Jakubowski is a physicist and universal philosopher, who has extended his Unified Physics to a Unified Description of the entire Universe, including life and human consciousness. The Formula of the Universe he discovered will fundamentally change all natural sciences and the technologies based on them.

Autoren/Hrsg.

Jakubowski, Peter

Leseproben

Part I. Unified Science Chapter 1. Unified Science is based on three pillars of the Universal Philosophy
1a. The Unified Family of All Physical Quantities 1b. The Quantum Spectrum of Matter-Spirit Quanta 1c. The Cosmic Hierarchy of our Solar System The Universe in which we live is quantised. This means that the energy of the Universe is only present and can be transmitted in certain portions, i.e. quanta. This is the main postulate of Unified Science, which is based on my Unified Physics. Although the quantisation of energy was already postulated a hundred years ago, the possibility that not only the world of atoms but also that of stars and galaxies could be quantised was only recognised by me in the 1980s and researched over the next few decades. The most important result of this research was the observation that we live in a huge Cosmic Hierarchy of the Solar System. 1a. The Unified Family of all physical quantities
It is not for nothing that Albert Einstein is recognised as one of the best scientists of all time. He taught us that space and time are to be considered as one unit, one space-time. However, he had not yet really realised the quantisation of the entire Universe. That is why he stuck to threedimensional space and one-dimensional (linear) time in his research. One of Einstein's greatest achievements was his courageous abandonment of the generally recognised Newtonian view of gravity. Einstein replaced it with the idea of the curvature of space-time (by the masses moving in it). The unification of all physics was for a long time the unfulfilled dream of the greatest physicists. When elementary particle physics celebrated its greatest successes in the 1970s, it was assumed, and often even claimed, that it was only a question of time and the cost of ever more powerful particle accelerators until all four elementary interactions (gravitational, electromagnetic, nuclear strong and weak), which were considered certain at the time, would be unified in a Theory of Everything (ToE). But that was a misunderstanding. The whole physics of elementary particles turned out to be a dead end of science. After my actual unification of physics, it turned out that all four "traditional" interactions were just an illusion of wrongly highly mathematised physics. True Unified Physics does not mean a unification of the traditionally conceived forces (interactions), but the complete abandonment of this idea. I have also ventured a totally new beginning, with a beginning from a potential, an ability to create everything else. And I postulated the quantisation of the entire Universe, which led me to a space-time other than Einstein's. There are only two quantum space dimensions. Only two quantum space dimensions are relevant, because if we determine the surface of the quantum (like an energetic "soap bubble"), its three-dimensional volume is already fixed. However, the unified quantum time can only be defined as its period (a measure of its cyclicity); quantum time does not flow, it circulates. Therefore, quantum space-time is (2+2)-dimensional, and not (3+1), as Einstein assumed. So we start with a One, a unity of everything, a mere ability to create everything else. We regard this One as the Universal Creative Potential, in short, as the Quantum of Creativity, an original energetic "soap bubble", where there is no soapy liquid on the surface, but energy. The first (and only!) creations of this potential are matter and the spirit of the Universe1. Matter (the spatial expansion of energy quanta) is created in the form of closed surfaces of all other energy quanta. Graphically, matter is created along the axis of the spatial area "A" of the new quanta. The spirit (the temporal changes, the interactions of the energy quanta) arises in the form of cyclic (two-dimensional) periods "t" of all energy quanta. Graphically, the spirit arises along the axis of the temporal periods of the new quanta. The consistent application of these two creations, the quantum dimension and the quantum period, to all other known physical quantities, enabled me to discover that all physical quantities, that our ancestors have introduced to the traditional physics, are clearly connected to each other. This in turn enabled me to define the Unified Family of all physical quantities. The complete level of the Unified Family of all physical quantities is shown in the picture below. The universal value xu of any quantum of any physical quantity X can be calculated (according to the rules in the upper left corner) from the universal length ru and the universal period tu of this quantum. To calculate the values of the other quanta of this physical quantity, you only need to multiply this universal value by the corresponding material factor. As can be seen from the diagram of the Quantum Spectrum (in Chapter I; point 1b below), the material factor µ has the value 1 for the universal quanta of membranes, the value between 1 and 0 for the quanta of non-living matter, and the value greater than 1 for the quanta of living organisms. The necessary power n of this material factor is calculated from the position (column C and row R) of the desired physical quantity X on our complete plane of the Unified Family. We never know exactly how the natural processes actually take place. We only imagine, always according to our current state of knowledge, how these processes could take place. It is precisely this physical observation, this idea of a natural process, that we regard as a physical process. Of course, the same difference also applies to the natural and physical states of Nature. We do not yet know the natural states. We observe Nature and imagine its states. We define these imagined states as the physical states. Physical quantities are the characteristic properties of a physical state of Nature, which physicists need in order to be able to describe a change in this state in a natural (but practically physical) process. To complete the description of the picture above, we explain how to obtain the universal values of quantum length and quantum period. From the row "0" of the diagram, we can see that the universal value of the action J is to be equated with Planck's constant h (but note: this is a postulate of Unified Physics). From the relation: h = 6.6260755*10-34 Js = (ru)4 , we calculate2 the value ru = 5.074 nm quoted in the picture. We obtain the universal value of the quantum period from the experimental value of the electric charge e and the relation visible in row 1: t*r3 = q2. In the further course of unifying the whole of physics, we can also completely get rid of these "contacts" to experimental physics. Nature needs neither our constants, nor physical quantities, nor physical equations in order to function. We will refrain here from a broader discussion of the individual properties of the individual dynamic and electrodynamic quantities. For example, what it means for technical practice that the electric current i must be a bivector and the electric voltage U a vector. We must leave that to the theorists among the electrical engineers. It is much more important for our general knowledge of Unified Science to be certain that an energetic quantised description of natural processes completely replaces both the dynamics and the electrodynamics of traditional science. We just need to understand this new narrative correctly and apply it consistently. For example, any force in a direction is nothing more than a gradient of energy along that direction (F = kW). And the gravitational factor is equal to the change in acceleration over time (G = fa). Finally, we have to note that the transition from electrodynamics to Unified Physics can only be realised via the electrodynamic quantities squared, which is demonstrated in the above diagram with the 6 examples (B2, E2, H2, i2, D2 and q 2). If we need several physical quantities for our description of Nature, i.e. in practice for our physics, then it makes sense to ask how the different quantities relate to each other. It makes sense to hope for such relations because they can make our task easier. We call the meaningful relations between different physical quantities physical equations. In the 1990s, I wrote a simple computer programme around the multiplication rules of the Unified Family. The programme was "fed" (as input) a list of all 27 dynamic and 17 electrodynamic3 basic physical quantities of the Unified Family (without temperature), with their relative positions to each other. The program stubbornly analysed, purely mathematically, all possible links between any two physical quantities, let's say Y and Z, and a third, let's say X. In plain language, this means that the programme tried to create a vast number of 44 to the power of 3, i.e. 85184 relations of the type X = Y * Z, from the list of 44 physical quantities given to it. However, the rules of the Unified Family built into the programme only allow it to output those relations that make physical sense. In the end, only 461 rules got through these filters4. When I began to analyse the 461 relations found by the program, I was surprised myself. All the more or less famous equations of physics that I knew (of course of this elementary type X = Y * Z) were included. But there were also a few new ones, which I hadn't even noticed when I analysed them before, without the help of the computer. In Table I we present examples of the best-known physical equations, named after their discoverers. Table I. Examples of well-known physical...