Buch, Englisch, 470 Seiten, Paperback, Format (B × H): 171 mm x 244 mm, Gewicht: 748 g
Buch, Englisch, 470 Seiten, Paperback, Format (B × H): 171 mm x 244 mm, Gewicht: 748 g
ISBN: 978-1-84946-659-2
Verlag: HART PUB
The collected data for each jurisdiction makes for engaging reading. It reveals details of the extent of visible (and sometimes implied) comparative activity that each of the courts displays in its jurisprudence. we now have a clearer picture of how some of the most prominent constitutional courts deal (or desist from dealing) with comparable judgments in other countries.
François Venter, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 12, no 1, January 2014
The volume. represents a refreshing approach to complex questions raised in debates about constitutional borrowing, transjudicial communication, or the migration of constitutional ideas. The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges will be essential reading for scholars seeking to refresh the debates about using foreign law.
Hélène Tyrrell, Public Law, April 2014
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
- Rechtswissenschaften Recht, Rechtswissenschaft Allgemein Recht mehrerer Jurisdiktionen, Synopsen
- Rechtswissenschaften Öffentliches Recht Staats- und Verfassungsrecht Verfassungsgeschichte, Verfassungsvergleichung
- Rechtswissenschaften Recht, Rechtswissenschaft Allgemein Rechtstheorie, Rechtsmethodik, Rechtsdogmatik, Rechtsprechungslehre
Weitere Infos & Material
Introduction. The Methodology of the Research: How to Assess the Reality of Transjudicial Communication?
Tania Groppi and Marie-Claire Ponthoreau
Part I
1. Reference to Foreign Precedents by the Australian High Court: A Matter of Method
Cheryl Saunders and Adrienne Stone
2. Canada: Protecting Rights in a 'Worldwide Rights Culture'. An Empirical Study of the Use of Foreign Precedents by the Supreme Court of Canada (1982-2010)
Gianluca Gentili
3. India: A 'Critical' Use of Foreign Precedents in Constitutional Adjudication
Valentina Rita Scotti
4. The Supreme Court of Ireland and the Use of Foreign Precedents: The Value of Constitutional History
Cristina Fasone
5. Israel: Creating a Constitution-The Use of Foreign Precedents by the Supreme Court (1994-2010)
Suzie Navot
6. Namibia: The Supreme Court as a Foreign Law Importer
Irene Spigno
7. South Africa: Teaching an 'Old Dog' New Tricks? An Empirical Study
of the Use of Foreign Precedents by the South African Constitutional Court (1995-2010)
Christa Rautenbach
Part II
8. Austria: Non-cosmopolitan, but Europe-friendly-The Constitutional Court's Comparative Approach
Anna Gamper
vi Contents
9. Lifting the Constitutional Curtain? The Use of Foreign Precedent by the German Federal Constitutional Court
Stefan Martini
10. Hungary: Unsystematic and Incoherent Borrowing of Law. The Use of Foreign Judicial Precedents in the Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, 1999-2010
Zoltán Szente
11. A Gap between the Apparent and Hidden Attitudes of the Supreme Court of Japan towards Foreign Precedents
Akiko Ejima
12. Mexico: Struggling for an Open View In Constitutional Adjudication
Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor and Rubén Sánchez Gil
13. Romania: Analogical Reasoning as a Dialectical Instrument
Elena Simina Tanasescu and Stefan Deaconu
14. Russia: Foreign Transplants in the Russian Constitution and Invisible Foreign Precedents in Decisions of the Russian Constitutional Court
Sergey Belov
15. Judges as Discursive Agent: The Use of Foreign Precedents by the Constitutional Court of Taiwan
Wen-Chen Chang and Jiunn-Rong Yeh
16. United States of America: First Cautious Attempts of Judicial Use of Foreign Precedents in the Supreme Court's Jurisprudence
Angioletta Sperti
Conclusion. The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges: A Limited Practice, An Uncertain Future
Tania Groppi and Marie-Claire Ponthoreau