Buch, Englisch, Band 8, 954 Seiten, Format (B × H): 155 mm x 235 mm, Gewicht: 1547 g
Reihe: Judges
Buch, Englisch, Band 8, 954 Seiten, Format (B × H): 155 mm x 235 mm, Gewicht: 1547 g
Reihe: Judges
ISBN: 978-90-04-43465-3
Verlag: Brill
As Full Professor at the Faculty of Law of the Catholic University of Lisbon, he has published, inter alia, 23 books in English, French, Italian, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Turkish and Ukranian and 65 legal articles and book chapters in those languages as well as Chinese and German. Since his appointment as a Judge in Strasbourg, he has authored 157 opinions that have significantly contributed to the development of international human rights law. The Judge’s decisions are regularly cited by academic scholars and practitioners in human rights law, public international law, criminal law, migration and refugee law.
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
- Rechtswissenschaften Internationales Recht und Europarecht Europarecht Europäisches Öffentliches Recht (inkl. EMRK)
- Rechtswissenschaften Internationales Recht und Europarecht Internationales Recht Internationale Menschen- und Minderheitenrechte, Kinderrechte
- Sozialwissenschaften Politikwissenschaft Politische Kultur Menschenrechte, Bürgerrechte
Weitere Infos & Material
Foreword
Laudatio for the Honorary Doctorate to Judge Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque
PART 1
The Politics of Human Rights
1 The Relationship between the Convention and Constitutional Law
1.1 From Constitutional Parochialism to Multilevel Constitutionalism (GIEM and Others v. Italy)
1.2 Double Standards in Europe (Hutchinson v. United Kingdom)
1.3 The Existential Risk Put by Illiberal Democracies (Baka v. Hungary)
2 The Relationship between the Convention and International Law
2.1 Evolutive Interpretation, European Consensus and Soft Law (Muršic v. Croatia)
2.2 The Clash between Strasbourg and the United Nations Security Council (Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland)
2.3 The Confrontation between Strasbourg and the United Nations Human Rights Committee (Correia de Matos v. Portugal)
PART 2
The Human Rights Challenges
3 Succumbing to Penal Populism
3.1 Too Much Unfairness in the “overall fairness” test (Murtazaliyeva v. Russia)
3.2 Retroactive Punishment of Dangerous Offenders (Ilnseher v. Germany)
3.3 Prison Overcrowding Out of Control (Mironovas and Others v. Lithuania)
3.4 Mentally Ill Prisoners Languishing in Limbo (Murray v. the Netherlands)
4 Defending Society from Its Enemies
4.1 Racism and Anti-Semitism (Vona v. Hungary)
4.2 Trafficking of Human Beings (J. and Others v. Austria)
4.3 Domestic Violence (Valiulienne v. Lithuania)
4.4 Organized Crime and Terrorism (Lagutin and Others v. Russia)
5 New Forms of Punishment
5.1 Lustration of Former Communists (Sõro v. Estonia)
5.2 Outsourcing Punishment to the Administration (A. and B. v. Norway)
5.3 Crimmigration of Young Migrants (Abdullahi Elmi and Aweys Abubakar Elmi v. Malta)
5.4 Dealing with Massive Crimes of the Past (Mocanu and Others v. Romania)
6 Promoting Internet as the New Global Market of Ideas
6.1 The Public-Forum Doctrine Revisited (Mouvement Raelien v. Switzerland)
6.2 Surveillance of Usage of Internet in the Workplace (Barbulescu v. Romania)
6.3 Blocking Content in the Internet (Yildirim v. Turkey)
6.4 Vicarious Liability for Hyperlinks (Magyar Jeti ZRT v. Hungary)
7 Defending the Foundations of the European Model of Social State (Sozialstaalichkeit)
7.1 Dismantling Labour Market in Times of Crisis (Hrvatski lijecnicki sindikat v. Croatia)
7.2 Public Health Care in Disruption (Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal)
7.3 Unfair Access to University Education (Tarantino and Others v. Italy)
7.4 Ostracizing Social Subsidies-Dependent Families (Garib v. the Netherlands)
8 Empowering Migrants as Citizens
8.1 Claim to Nationality by Stateless Person (Ramadan v. Malta)
8.2 Access to Justice by Asylum Seekers (Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy)
8.3 Family Life of Undocumented Migrants (De Souza Ribeiro v. France)
8.4 Health Care for terminally Ill-Foreigners (S. J. v. Belgium)
PART 3
The Methods of Human Rights Law
9 Judge-Made Law: Is the Case Law Coherent?
9.1 Principled v. Casuistic Reasoning (Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania)
9.2 Vertical v. Horizontal Stare Decisis (Herrmann v. Germany)
10 Strasbourg Consequential Orders: Words Blown against the Wind?
10.1 The Realm of Confusion: General, Individual and Mixed Orders (Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no.2))
10.2 Just Satisfaction 2.0: Imposing Punitive Damages (Cyprus v. Turkey (Article 41))
Table of Cases
Table of Treaties and Otherher International Documents
Bibliography
Index