Bettinger / Merry / Boston Forest Plans of North America

1. Auflage 2015
ISBN: 978-0-12-799931-9
Verlag: Elsevier Reference Monographs
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: Adobe DRM (»Systemvoraussetzungen)

E-Book, Englisch, 483 Seiten

Forest Plans of North America presents case studies of contemporary forest management plans developed for forests owned by federal, state, county, and municipal governments, communities, families, individuals, industry, investment organizations, conservation organizations, and others in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The book provides excellent real-life examples of contemporary forest planning processes, the various methods used, and the diversity of objectives and constraints faced by forest owners. Chapters are written by those who have developed the plans, with each contribution following a unified format and allowing a common, clear presentation of the material, along with consistent treatment of various aspects of the plans. This work complements other books published by members of the same editorial team (Forest Management and Planning, Introduction to Forestry and Natural Resource Management), which describe the planning process and the various methods one might use to develop a plan, but in general do not, as this work does, illustrate what has specifically been developed by landowners and land managers. This is an in-depth compilation of case studies on the development of forest management plans by the different landowner groups in North America. The book offers students, practitioners, policy makers, and the general public an opportunity to greatly improve their appreciation of forest management and, more importantly, foster an understanding of why our forests today are what they are and what forces and tools may shape their tomorrow. Forest Plans of North America provides a solid supplement to those texts that are used as learning tools for forest management courses. In addition, the work functions as a reference for the types of processes used and issues addressed in the early 21st century for managing land resources.
Presents 40-50 case studies of forest plans developed for a wide variety of organizations, groups, and landowners in North AmericaIllustrates plans that have specifically been developed by landowners and land managersFeatures engaging, clearly written content that is accessible rather than highly technical, while demonstrating the issues and methods involved in the development of the plansEach chapter contains color photographs, maps, and figures

Autoren/Hrsg.

Bettinger, Pete

Merry, Krista

Boston, Kevin

Cieszewski, Chris

Inhaltsverzeichnis

1;Front Cover;1
2;Forest Plans of North America;4
3;Copyright;5
4;Contents;6
5;Contributors;14
6;Preface;18
7;Units;22
8;Abbreviations;24
9;Chapter 1. Camp No-Be-Bo-Sco, New Jersey, United States of America;26
9.1;Management Setting and Background;26
9.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;28
9.3;Outcomes of the Plan;31
9.4;Discussion and Conclusions;33
9.5;References;34
10;Chapter 2. Eddyville Tree Farm, Oregon, United States of America;36
10.1;Management Setting and Background;36
10.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;37
10.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;37
10.2.2;Silvicultural Issues;39
10.3;Outcomes of the Plan;43
10.4;Discussion and Conclusions;43
10.4.1;Learnings and Insights;44
10.4.2;Plan Development Challenges;44
10.4.3;Plan Implementation Challenges;44
10.5;References;44
11;Chapter 3. Michael Family Forest, Texas, United States of America;46
11.1;Management Setting and Background;46
11.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;48
11.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;50
11.3;Outcomes of the Plan;51
11.4;Discussions and Conclusions;51
11.4.1;Sustainability Issues;51
11.4.2;Plan Implementation Challenges;51
11.5;References;52
12;Chapter 4. Pike Lumber Company’s Sam Little Forest, Indiana, United States of America;54
12.1;Management Setting and Background;54
12.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;55
12.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;57
12.3;Outcomes of the Plan;58
12.4;Discussion and Conclusions;58
12.4.1;Sustainability Issues;58
12.4.2;Plan Development Challenges;58
12.4.3;Plan Implementation Challenges;58
12.5;References;59
13;Chapter 5. Poole and Pianta Woodlot, West Virginia, United States of America;60
13.1;Management Setting and Background;60
13.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;61
13.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;63
13.3;Outcomes of the Plan;63
13.4;Discussion and Conclusions;64
13.4.1;Sustainability Issues;64
13.4.2;Plan Development Challenges;65
13.4.3;Plan Implementation Challenges;65
13.5;References;65
14;Chapter 6. Rib Lake School Forest, Wisconsin, United States of America;66
14.1;Management Setting and Background;66
14.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;68
14.3;Outcomes of the Plan;70
14.4;Discussion and Conclusions;70
14.4.1;Learnings and Insights;70
14.4.2;Sustainability Issues;71
14.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;71
14.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;71
14.5;References;71
15;Chapter 7. Shirley Town Forest, New Hampshire, United States of America;72
15.1;Management Setting and Background;72
15.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;73
15.3;Outcomes of the Plan;74
15.4;Discussion and Conclusions;76
15.4.1;Learnings and Insights;76
15.4.2;Sustainability Issues;76
15.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;76
15.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;77
15.4.5;Other Interesting Issues Related to the Plan;77
15.5;References;77
16;Chapter 8. Arcata Community Forest, California, United States of America;78
16.1;Management Setting and Background;78
16.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;80
16.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;80
16.2.2;Forest Types and Current Silvicultural Practices;81
16.3;Outcomes of the Plan;82
16.4;Discussion and Conclusions;83
16.4.1;Learnings and Insights;83
16.4.2;Sustainability Issues;83
16.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;83
16.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;84
16.5;Additional Reading and Resources;84
16.6;References;84
17;Chapter 9. Ejido Borbollones, Durango, Mexico;86
17.1;Management Setting and Background;86
17.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;87
17.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;87
17.2.2;Silvicultural and Analytical Systems;88
17.3;Outcomes of the Plan;90
17.4;Discussion and Conclusions;91
17.4.1;Learnings and Insights;91
17.4.2;Sustainability Issues;91
17.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;91
17.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;92
17.4.5;Other Interesting Issues Related to the Plan;92
17.5;References;92
18;Chapter 10. Harvard University Forest, Massachusetts, United States of America;94
18.1;Management Setting and Background;94
18.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;97
18.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;98
18.3;Outcomes of the Plan;99
18.4;Discussion and Conclusions;100
18.4.1;Learnings and Insights;100
18.4.2;Sustainability Issues;101
18.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;101
18.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;101
18.4.5;Other Interesting Issues Related to the Plan;102
18.5;References;102
19;Chapter 11. Dubuar Memorial Forest, New York, United States of America;104
19.1;Management Setting and Background;104
19.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;106
19.3;Outcomes of the Plan;108
19.4;Discussion and Conclusions;109
19.4.1;Sustainability Issues;110
19.4.2;Plan Development Challenges;110
19.4.3;Plan Implementation Challenges;110
19.5;References;111
20;Chapter 12. McPhail Tree Farm, South Carolina, United States of America;112
20.1;Management Setting and Background;112
20.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;114
20.2.1;Objectives for the Analyzed Area;114
20.2.2;Constraints for the Analyzed Area;114
20.2.3;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;115
20.2.4;Certification Requirements;115
20.2.5;Methods for Developing the Plan;116
20.3;Outcomes of the Plan;118
20.4;Discussion and Conclusions;119
20.4.1;Learnings and Insights;119
20.4.2;Sustainability Issues;120
20.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;120
20.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;120
20.4.5;Other Interesting Issues Related to the Plan;121
20.5;References;121
21;Chapter 13. Molinillos Private Forest Estate, Durango, Mexico;122
21.1;Management Setting and Background;122
21.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;124
21.3;Outcomes of the Plan;128
21.4;Discussion and Conclusions;128
21.4.1;Learnings and Insights;129
21.4.2;Sustainability Issues;129
21.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;129
21.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;129
21.4.5;Other Relevant Issues Related to the Plan;130
21.4.6;Acknowledgments;130
21.5;References;130
22;Chapter 14. Ross Forests, Tennessee, United States of America;132
22.1;Management Setting and Background;132
22.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;133
22.2.1;Forest Management Program;134
22.3;Outcomes of the Plan;140
22.4;Discussion and Conclusions;140
22.4.1;Learnings and Insights;140
22.4.2;Sustainability Issues;142
22.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;142
22.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;142
22.5;References;143
23;Chapter 15. Willow Break LLC, Mississippi, United States of America;144
23.1;Management Setting and Background;144
23.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;147
23.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;147
23.3;Outcomes of the Plan;150
23.4;Discussion and Conclusions;152
23.4.1;Sustainability Issues;152
23.4.2;Plan Development Challenges;152
23.4.3;Plan Implementation Challenges;152
23.5;References;153
24;Chapter 16. Blue Ridge Parkway, Virginia and North Carolina, United States of America;154
24.1;Management Setting and Background;154
24.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;156
24.2.1;Identification of the Preferred Alternative and Analysis of Impacts;159
24.3;Outcomes of the Plan;160
24.4;Discussion and Conclusions;161
24.4.1;Learnings and Insights;161
24.4.2;Sustainability Issues;162
24.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;162
24.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;162
24.4.5;Other Interesting Issues Related to the Plan;162
24.5;Additional Reading and Resources;163
24.6;References;163
25;Chapter 17. Chesapeake Forest Lands, Maryland, United States of America;164
25.1;Management Setting and Background;164
25.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;166
25.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;167
25.2.2;Forest Types and Current Silvicultural Practices;168
25.3;Outcomes of the Plan;170
25.4;Discussion and Conclusions;171
25.4.1;Learnings and Insights;171
25.4.2;Sustainability Issues;171
25.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;172
25.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;172
25.5;Additional Reading and Resources;173
25.6;References;173
26;Chapter 18. Durango State University Forest Las Bayas, Durango, Mexico;174
26.1;Management Setting and Background;174
26.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;175
26.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;176
26.2.2;Data Development and Analysis;177
26.2.3;Silvicultural Strategies;178
26.3;Outcomes of the Plan;179
26.4;Discussion and Conclusions;180
26.4.1;Learnings and Insights;180
26.4.2;Sustainability Issues;180
26.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;181
26.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;181
26.4.5;Other Interesting Issues Related to the Plan;181
26.5;References;182
27;Chapter 19. Garcia River Forest, California, United States of America;184
27.1;Management Setting and Background;184
27.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;187
27.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;187
27.3;Outcomes of the Plan;189
27.4;Discussion and Conclusions;190
27.4.1;Sustainability Issues;191
27.5;Additional Reading and Resources;192
27.6;References;192
28;Chapter 20. Indigenous Community of Nuevo San Juan Parangaricutiro, Michoacán, Mexico;194
28.1;Management Setting and Background;194
28.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;196
28.2.1;Plan Development Process;197
28.3;Outcomes of the Plan;198
28.4;Discussion and Conclusions;199
28.4.1;Learnings and Insights;199
28.4.2;Sustainability Issues;199
28.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;199
28.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;200
28.4.5;Acknowledgements;200
28.5;References;200
29;Chapter 21. Jackson Demonstration State Forest, California, United States of America;202
29.1;Management Setting and Background;202
29.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;204
29.2.1;Management Objectives;204
29.2.2;Constraints and Opportunities for the Planning Area;205
29.2.3;Plan Development Methods;207
29.2.4;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;208
29.3;Outcomes of the Plan;208
29.4;Discussion and Conclusions;211
29.4.1;Sustainability Issues;211
29.4.2;Plan Development Challenges;211
29.4.3;Plan Implementation Challenges;211
29.5;Additional Reading and Resources;212
29.6;References;212
30;Chapter 22. Mission Municipal Forest, British Columbia, Canada;214
30.1;Management Setting and Background;214
30.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;216
30.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;218
30.3;Outcomes of the Plan;219
30.4;Discussion and Conclusions;219
30.4.1;Learnings and Insights;219
30.4.2;Sustainability Issues;220
30.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;220
30.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;221
30.5;Additional Reading and Resources;221
30.6;References;222
31;Chapter 23. San Pedro El Alto Community Forest, Oaxaca, Mexico;224
31.1;Management Setting and Background;224
31.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;227
31.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;228
31.2.2;Community Organization;229
31.2.3;Decision Support System;229
31.3;Outcomes of the Plan;230
31.4;Discussion and Conclusions;231
31.4.1;Learnings and Insights;231
31.4.2;Sustainability Issues;231
31.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;231
31.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;232
31.4.5;Other Interesting Aspects of the Plan;232
31.5;References;232
32;Chapter 24. Sand Hills State Forest, South Carolina, United States of America;234
32.1;Management Setting and Background;234
32.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;237
32.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;237
32.3;Outcomes of the Plan;238
32.4;Discussion and Conclusions;239
32.4.1;Learnings and Insights;239
32.4.2;Sustainability Issues;239
32.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;239
32.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;239
32.4.5;References;240
33;Chapter 25. Sessoms Timber Trust, Georgia, United States of America;242
33.1;Management Setting and Background;242
33.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;245
33.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;246
33.3;Outcomes of the Plan;247
33.4;Discussion and Conclusions;247
33.4.1;Sustainability Issues;248
33.4.2;Plan Development Challenges;248
33.4.3;Plan Implementation Challenges;248
33.4.4;References;248
34;Chapter 26. South Willapa Bay Conservation Area, Washington, United States of America;250
34.1;Management Setting and Background;250
34.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;252
34.2.1;Constraints for the Analyzed Area;253
34.2.2;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;253
34.2.3;Plan Development Methods;254
34.3;Outcomes of the Plan;256
34.4;Discussion and Conclusions;256
34.4.1;Learnings and Insights;256
34.4.2;Sustainability Issues;257
34.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;257
34.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;257
34.5;References;258
35;Chapter 27. Umbagog National Wildlife Refuge, New Hampshire, United States of America;260
35.1;Management Setting and Background;260
35.2;Planning Environment or Methodology;262
35.2.1;Management Units and Management Zones;262
35.2.2;Desired Forest Conditions;263
35.3;Outcomes of the Plan;264
35.4;Discussion and Conclusions;266
35.4.1;Learnings and Insights;267
35.4.2;Sustainability Issues;267
35.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;267
35.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;267
35.4.5;Other Interesting Issues Related to the Plan;268
35.4.6;References;268
36;Chapter 28. Weaverville Community Forest, California, United States of America;270
36.1;Management Setting and Background;270
36.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;271
36.2.1;Stewardship Contracting;273
36.3;Outcomes of the Plan;276
36.4;Discussion and Conclusions;277
36.4.1;Sustainability Issues;277
36.4.2;Plan Development Challenges;277
36.4.3;Plan Implementation Challenges;277
36.4.4;Learning and Insights;278
36.5;References;278
37;Chapter 29. Yale School Forests, New England, United States of America;280
37.1;Management Setting and Background;280
37.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;282
37.2.1;Plan Development Methods and Constraints;285
37.2.2;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;286
37.3;Outcomes of the Plan;287
37.4;Discussion and Conclusions;287
37.4.1;Learnings and Insights;287
37.4.2;Sustainability Issues;287
37.4.3;Plan Implementation Challenges;288
37.5;References;288
38;Chapter 30. Bayfield County Forest, Wisconsin, United States of America;290
38.1;Management Setting and Background;290
38.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;292
38.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;292
38.2.2;Methodology of Planning Process;293
38.3;Outcomes of the Plan;296
38.4;Discussion and Conclusions;297
38.4.1;Learnings and Insights;298
38.4.2;Sustainability Issues;298
38.4.3;Plan Implementation Challenges;298
38.4.4;Other Interesting Issues Related to the Plan;299
38.5;Additional Reading and Resources;299
38.6;References;300
39;Chapter 31. Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forest, Georgia, United States of America;302
39.1;Management Setting and Background;302
39.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;303
39.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;304
39.3;Outcomes of the Plan;306
39.4;Discussion and Conclusions;307
39.4.1;Learnings and Insights;307
39.4.2;Sustainability Issues;307
39.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;308
39.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;308
39.4.5;Other Interesting Issues Related to the Plan;308
39.5;Additional Reading and Resources;308
39.6;References;309
40;Chapter 32. City of San Francisco, California, United States of America;310
40.1;Management Setting and Background;310
40.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;312
40.3;Outcomes of the Plan;315
40.4;Discussion and Conclusions;315
40.4.1;Sustainability Issues;316
40.4.2;Plan Development Challenges;316
40.4.3;Plan Implementation Challenges;316
40.4.4;Other Interesting Issues Related to the Plan;316
40.5;Additional Reading and Resources;316
40.6;References;317
41;Chapter 33. Forest Management Unit 13 — Forest Management License (FMU) 3, Manitoba, Canada;318
41.1;Management Setting and Background;318
41.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;320
41.2.1;Strategic Planning Model;323
41.2.2;Tactical Planning Model;324
41.2.3;Implementation of Goals and Objectives;325
41.3;Outcomes of the Plan;326
41.4;Discussion and Conclusions;327
41.4.1;Learnings and Insights;327
41.4.2;Sustainability Issues;327
41.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;327
41.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;327
41.5;References;327
42;Chapter 34. Fort Wainwright, Alaska, United States of America;328
42.1;Management Setting and Background;328
42.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;331
42.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;331
42.2.2;Silvicultural Activities Considered;332
42.3;Outcomes of the Plan;332
42.4;Discussion and Conclusions;333
42.4.1;Learnings and Insights;333
42.4.2;Sustainability Issues;333
42.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;334
42.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;334
42.4.5;Other Interesting Issues Related to the Plan;334
42.5;References;335
43;Chapter 35. Green Diamond Resource Company, California, United States of America;336
43.1;Management Setting and Background;336
43.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;337
43.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;337
43.2.2;Planning Process and Silvicultural Direction;339
43.2.3;Planning System;341
43.3;Outcomes of the Plan;342
43.4;Discussion and Conclusions;342
43.4.1;Learnings and Insights;342
43.4.2;Sustainability Issues;343
43.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;343
43.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;343
43.5;References;344
44;Chapter 36. Northwest Oregon State Forests, United States of America;346
44.1;Management Setting and Background;346
44.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;349
44.2.1;Constraints and Opportunities for the Planning Area;349
44.2.2;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;350
44.2.3;NW FMP Development Methods;351
44.3;Outcomes of the Plan;352
44.4;Discussion and Conclusions;353
44.4.1;Learnings and Insights;354
44.4.2;Sustainability Issues;354
44.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;355
44.4.4;Plan Implementing Challenges;356
44.5;References;357
45;Chapter 37. Revelstoke Community Forest — Tree Farm License (TFL) 56, British Columbia, Canada;358
45.1;Management Setting and Background;358
45.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;361
45.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;361
45.2.2;Management Plan Development;362
45.3;Outcomes of the Plan;363
45.4;Discussion and Conclusions;364
45.4.1;Sustainability Issues;364
45.4.2;Plan Development Challenges;364
45.4.3;Plan Implementation Challenges;364
45.5;Additional Reading and Resources;365
45.6;References;365
46;Chapter 38. South Puget Planning Unit, Washington, United States of America;366
46.1;Management Setting and Background;366
46.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;368
46.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;368
46.2.2;Objectives for the Analyzed Area;368
46.2.3;Plan Development Methods;369
46.3;Outcomes of the Plan;370
46.4;Discussion and Conclusions;372
46.4.1;Sustainability Issues;372
46.4.2;Plan Development Challenges;373
46.4.3;Plan Implementation Challenges;373
46.4.4;Learnings and Insights;373
46.5;References;373
47;Chapter 39. Weyerhaeuser, North Carolina, United States of America;376
47.1;Management Setting and Background;376
47.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;378
47.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;379
47.2.2;Modeling Process;380
47.3;Outcomes of the Plan;381
47.4;Discussion and Conclusions;382
47.4.1;Plan Implementation Challenges;382
47.4.2;Acknowledgments;382
47.5;References;382
48;Chapter 40. Yakama Reservation, Washington, United States of America;384
48.1;Management Setting and Background;384
48.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;386
48.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;387
48.2.2;Planning Process;387
48.3;Outcomes of the Plan;389
48.4;Discussion and Conclusions;390
48.4.1;Sustainability Issues;390
48.4.2;Plan Implementation Challenges;390
48.5;References;391
49;Chapter 41. French-Severn Forest, Ontario, Canada;392
49.1;Management Setting and Background;392
49.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;394
49.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;394
49.2.2;Process for the Protection and Maintenance of Social and Environmental Values;395
49.2.3;Public Consultation Process;396
49.2.4;Strategic Modeling Process;397
49.3;Outcomes of the Plan;399
49.4;Discussion and Conclusions;399
49.4.1;Learnings and Insights;400
49.4.2;Sustainability Issues;400
49.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;400
49.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;400
49.5;Additional Reading and Resources;400
49.6;References;400
50;Chapter 42. Martel Forest, Ontario, Canada;402
50.1;Management Setting and Background;402
50.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;405
50.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;405
50.2.2;Strategic Modeling Approach;407
50.3;Outcomes of the Plan;409
50.4;Discussion and Conclusions;410
50.4.1;Learnings and Insights;410
50.4.2;Sustainability Issues;410
50.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;410
50.5;Additional Reading and Resources;411
50.6;References;411
51;Chapter 43. Prince Albert Forest Management Agreement (FMA), Saskatchewan, Canada;412
51.1;Management Setting and Background;412
51.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;415
51.3;Outcomes of the Plan;417
51.4;Discussion and Conclusions;418
51.4.1;Learnings and Insights;418
51.4.2;Sustainability Issues;418
51.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;418
51.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;419
51.5;Additional Reading and Resources;419
51.6;References;419
52;Chapter 44. Rayonier, Inc., Southern United States of America;420
52.1;Management Setting and Background;420
52.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;421
52.2.1;Harvest Scheduling System;421
52.3;Outcomes of the Plan;426
52.4;Discussion and Conclusions;426
52.4.1;Learnings and Insights;426
52.4.2;Sustainability Issues;427
52.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;427
52.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;427
52.5;References;427
53;Chapter 45. San Juan National Forest, Colorado, United States of America;428
53.1;Management Setting or Background;428
53.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;430
53.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;431
53.3;Outcomes of the Plan;432
53.4;Discussion and Conclusions;434
53.4.1;Learnings and Insights;434
53.4.2;Sustainability Issues;435
53.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;435
53.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;435
53.5;Additional Reading and Resources;435
53.6;References;436
54;Chapter 46. Tongass National Forest, Alaska, United States of America;438
54.1;Management Setting and Background;438
54.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;439
54.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;440
54.3;Outcomes of the Plan;443
54.4;Discussion and Conclusions;444
54.4.1;Learnings and Insights;444
54.4.2;Sustainability Issues;444
54.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;445
54.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;445
54.4.5;Other Interesting Issues Related to the Plan;445
54.4.6;References;446
55;Chapter 47. Western Oregon Districts, Bureau of Land Management, United States of America;448
55.1;Management Setting and Background;448
55.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;451
55.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;452
55.2.2;Planning, Decision, and Analysis Area;452
55.2.3;Vision, Goals, and Objectives;453
55.3;Outcomes of the Plan;454
55.4;Discussion and Conclusions;454
55.4.1;Learnings and Insights;455
55.4.2;Sustainability Issues;455
55.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;455
55.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;456
55.4.5;Other Interesting Aspects of the Plan;456
55.5;References;457
56;Chapter 48. Whitefeather Forest, Ontario, Canada;458
56.1;Management Setting and Background;458
56.2;Planning Environment and Methodology;461
56.2.1;Guiding Laws, Regulations, and Policies;461
56.2.2;Plan Development Process;462
56.3;Outcomes of the Plan;464
56.4;Discussion and Conclusions;465
56.4.1;Learnings and Insights;465
56.4.2;Sustainability Issues;466
56.4.3;Plan Development Challenges;466
56.4.4;Plan Implementation Challenges;466
56.5;Additional Reading and Resources;466
56.6;References;466
57;Chapter 49. Synopsis of Forest Management Plans of North America;468
57.1;Ownership Entities;468
57.2;The Range in Management Objectives;469
57.3;Planning Methods Used to Prepare the Plans;470
57.4;Sustainability Issues that Have Arisen from the Plans;471
57.5;Lesson Learned from the Plans;472
57.6;Regulatory Compliance;472
57.7;Conclusion;473
58;Index;474

Leseproben

Contributors
Mark S. Andre     City of Arcata, Arcata, California, USA Steve Andringa     Yakama Nation Forestry, Toppenish, Washington, USA Mark S. Ashton     Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven, Connecticut, USA Jeff Barkley     Wisconsin County Forests Association, Rhinelander, Wisconsin, USA Alex L. Barrett     Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven, Connecticut, USA Greg Bentley     Campbell Global, Forest and Natural Resources Investments, Mississippi, USA Pete Bettinger     Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA Bud Bigelow     Weyerhaeuser Company, Timberlands Strategic Planning, Federal Way, Washington, USA Gerardo Bocco     Centro de Investigaciones en Geografía Ambiental, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico Jason Bodine     Bayfield County Forestry and Parks Department, Washburn, Wisconsin, USA Kevin Bollefer     Revelstoke Community Forest Corporation, Revelstoke, British Columbia, Canada Kevin Boston     Department of Forest Engineering, Resources and Management, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA Javier L. Bretado-Velázquez     Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango, Mexico Angus Brodie     Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington, USA Cam Brown     Forsite Consultants Ltd., Salmon Arm, British Columbia, Canada Paul Casey     Northern Forest Land Management Research and Demonstration Program, Umbagog National Wildlife Refuge, Errol, New Hampshire, USA Juan Manuel Cassian-Santos     Col. Periferia, Durango, Mexico Cathy Chauvin     Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington, USA Chris Cieszewski     Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA J. Javier Corral-Rivas     Instituto de Silvicultura e Industria de la Madera, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango, Mexico Alex Cousins     Trinity County Resource Conservation District, Weaverville, California, USA Kristofer Covey     Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven, Connecticut, USA Kevin Crowe     Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada Tamara L. Cushing     Department of Forest Engineering, Resources and Management, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA Scott Danskin     South Carolina Forestry Commission, Wedgefield, South Carolina, USA Barry Davidson     Westwind Forest Stewardship Inc., Parry Sound, Ontario, Canada Adam Davis     DPW Environmental Division, Fort Wainwright, Alaska, USA Liane Davis     The Nature Conservancy, Astoria, Oregon, USA Brian Davis     Sand Hills State Forest, South Carolina Forestry Commission, Patrick, South Carolina, USA Héctor M. de los Santos-Posadas     Colegio de Postgraduados, Postgrado en Ciencias Forestales, Montecillo, Estado de México, Mexico Mehmet Demirci     Forest Management and Planning Department, General Directorate of Forestry, Ministry of Forest and Water Affairs, Ankara, Turkey Duane Dippon     Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, Washington, District of Columbia, USA Ian Drew     Northern Forest Land Management Research and Demonstration Program, Umbagog National Wildlife Refuge, Errol, New Hampshire, USA Marlyse C. Duguid     Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven, Connecticut, USA Helge Eng     California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Sacramento, California, USA Robert A. Ewing     Weyerhaeuser Company, Timberlands Strategic Planning, Federal Way, Washington, USA Peter Farrell     New England Forestry Consultants, Inc., Alton, New Hampshire, USA Sean Flint     Northern Forest Land Management Research and Demonstration Program, Umbagog National Wildlife Refuge, Errol, New Hampshire, USA David Foster     Harvard Forest, Harvard University, Petersham, Massachusetts, USA Patrick Frost     Shasta College-Trinity Campus, Weaverville, California, USA Felipe Aguilar Gómez     Comunidad Indígena de Nuevo San Juan Parangaricutiro, Municipio de Nuevo San Juan, Nuevo San Juan Parangaricutiro, Michoacán, Mexico Donald L. Grebner     Department of Forestry, Mississippi State, Mississippi, USA Oliver Grimm     Pike Lumber Company, Akron, Indiana, USA Anne Hairston-Strang     Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Forest Service, Annapolis, Maryland, USA Jim Hawkins     Green Diamond Resource Company, Korbel, California, USA Kirsten Held     Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin, USA J. Ciro Hernández-Díaz     Instituto de Silvicultura e Industria de la Madera, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango, Mexico Chris Hoffman     Ashland County Forestry Department, Butternut, Wisconsin, USA William Hunter     U.S. Marine Corps, Hampstead, North Carolina, USA Bob Izlar     Center for Forest Business, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA Gary W. Johnson     Blue Ridge Parkway, Asheville, North Carolina, USA Kenneth Jolly     Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Forest Service, Annapolis, Maryland, USA Steven W. Kallesser     Gracie & Harrigan Consulting Foresters, Inc., Far Hills, New Jersey, USA Scott Kelly     North Coast Forest Conservation Program, The Conservation Fund, Caspar, California, USA Robert Keron     Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Forests Branch, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada Anna M. Klepacka     Department of Production Management and Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland Dave Knight     Sakâw Askiy Management Inc., Prince Albert, Saskatchewan, Canada Steven Koehn     USDA Forest Service, Washington, District of Columbia, USA Tom Kollasch     The Nature Conservancy, Astoria, Oregon, USA Jeremy Koslowski     Polk County Forestry Department, Balsam Lake, Wisconsin, USA Venkatesh...